Вася прям красавчик получился😁
😁5💩1

Channel
@fishki_olgaproonline
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
643subscribers
+199 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001987273274 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fishki_olgaproonline |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fishki_olgaproonline |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 643 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 646 | +205 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 441 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:12 | 443 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:04 | 444 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:20 | 444 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 24 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
91 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 35 | 38.5% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 37.4% | |
| 💯 | 14 | 15.4% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 7.69% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 27 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вася прям красавчик получился😁
😁5💩1
Про то, как я работа с ии-агентами сейчас и в том числе на черную пятницу
❤2🔥1
Как это все создается
❤4
Это я пилю контент на месяц вперед для запуска. За месяц! Я уже знаю тему марафона, тему и тезисы каждого дня, условия продаж, бонусы каждого эфира и все детали Палю внутрянку:) Это, конечно, не скромно, но я считаю, гениально😁
🔥14😁2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤4🔥4💯2
🤪🤪👍👍🔥🔥🤪🔥😂😂🔥😂 Как создать своего ии-ассистента, который будет помогать структурировать всю информацию, раскидывать задачи по календарю, помогать планировать личное и рабочее. Рассказала подробно. Слушайте на х2. Если есть вопросы, велкам! Буду очень благодарна каждому за обратную связь, интересно ли, полезно ли, понятно ли? Потому что мне многое кажется очевидным, точно не очевидно многим❤️ 🔥 - это бомба ❤️ - вр…
🔥7❤1
Увидела разбор запуска Тимочко. И знаете, на чем себя поймала? Я не хочу смотреть, тк уверена, что его методы запусков на сотни миллионов для меня неприменимы. Обычно я смотрю такие разборы, но сейчас прям решила не тратить время. И да, точечно фишки можно брать и адаптировать, но если смотреть комплексно, то такие запуски могут делать только те, у кого уже есть ресурсы. Я немного секу в запусках и инфобизе... но …
💯12❤4
Если я выпала, значит у меня запуск😂 Или нет... Ну, в этот раз именно такая причина: запуск нового курса по Воронкам на геткурсе на этой неделе + запуск грандиозной распродажи на мой др на следующей неделе!😍 Если что-то интересно по запускам, то жду вопросы, смогу поделиться и разобрать, как их завершу
❤7
Кто хотел поработать лично🔥🧠 Как показывает практика, на каком бы уровне вы ни были — всегда есть следующий этаж и нужны другие действия. ⠀ 🧠 И если вы чувствуете, что: — хочется идти дальше, но нужна стратегия и сопровождение — есть запрос на рост дохода, но не хватает четкости — уже не хочется учиться «в стол», а нужно именно разбирать ваши ситуации и получать конкретные решения ⠀ Сейчас запускаю новую программу: …
❤2🔥1
Когда запуск в самом разграре. Ловите лайфхак: 1. Регистрируете джипити 2. Создаете агента-маркетолога 3. Обучаете его на всех материалах с прошлых запусков: презентациях стуктурах таблицах матрицах цен картах продукта скриптах для менеджеров самом наполнении продукта выводах с планерок + кормите ему какие-то очень умные и актуальные материалы по онлайн-маркетингу! 4. Привлекаете его к помощи для создания и реализац…
🔥7❤5
Конечно! С бесплатными надо было успевать летом прошлого года. Была акция невиданной щедрости))) Тк мне нужно было самой провести кастдевы через эти консультации. Теперь есть только платные варианты❤️ Но они есть. Провожу консультации на тему запусков, докрутки вебинаров, продаж, воронок. Скоро сделаю лендинг, а то пока есть только ленд по консультациям для специалистов.
❤6
Live stream finished (37 minutes)
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @fishki_olgaproonline. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Где бизнес теряет деньги | Ольга Третьякова” (@fishki_olgaproonline), 643 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fishki_olgaproonline.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.