האמור לעיל מבוסס על מידע פומבי גלוי לציבור. קבוצת הראל פיננסים אינה אחראית לאמור ואין לראות בו ייעוץ השקעות או המלצה כלשהי. קבוצת הראל פיננסים או צדדים קשורים אליה עשויים להחזיק או לסחור, עבור עצמם או עבור אחרים, בניירות הערך והנכסים הפיננסיים המצויינים.
Created
Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 2 of the 4 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 26 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @harelfinancenews. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
32 measurements spanning 51 days, net +253. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,529–38,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 21:56
37,881
-7
19 Sept 2026, 17:16
37,888
-15
17 Sept 2026, 03:00
37,903
+1
15 Sept 2026, 05:16
37,902
-9
13 Sept 2026, 12:40
37,911
-6
11 Sept 2026, 18:57
37,917
-17
9 Sept 2026, 05:02
37,934
-25
5 Sept 2026, 19:57
37,959
-18
3 Sept 2026, 16:40
37,977
-14
2 Sept 2026, 07:34
37,991
-10
1 Sept 2026, 04:18
38,001
-5
31 Aug 2026, 06:37
38,006
-6
30 Aug 2026, 04:17
38,012
-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:12
38,017
+18
28 Aug 2026, 06:28
37,999
+15
27 Aug 2026, 04:46
37,984
+15
26 Aug 2026, 03:55
37,969
+83
24 Aug 2026, 09:06
37,886
+101
22 Aug 2026, 19:36
37,785
+74
21 Aug 2026, 08:24
37,711
first reading
Engagement
343 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 93 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.6%
avg views ÷ 37,881 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,020
161 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.264%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
161
of 343 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
343 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
646,568
Reactions total
1,708
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 14:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈25,200
Videos
≈308
Links
≈17,400
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
9s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,326 reactions across 339 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,296
39.0%
❤
1,211
36.4%
🔥
173
5.20%
👏
151
4.54%
🤣
107
3.22%
🤮
55
1.65%
😭
38
1.14%
👎
33
0.992%
😁
26
0.782%
🥰
25
0.752%
🤡
22
0.661%
💯
21
0.631%
👌
20
0.601%
😱
19
0.571%
😢
17
0.511%
💩
15
0.451%
🕊
12
0.361%
🤔
12
0.361%
🤬
12
0.361%
🙏
11
0.331%
15 further kinds
50
1.50%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 341 of the 343 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,326 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 343 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 341 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @financenewsbyharel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 343 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
פינת #העצה_השבועית
סורוס שרד כנער יהודי את הכיבוש הנאצי בהונגריה, היגר לבריטניה והפך לאחד ממנהלי קרנות הגידור המצליחים בהיסטוריה.
הוא הקים את קרן קוונטום והתפרסם ב-1992 לאחר שהימר נגד הליש״ט.
לדבריו, סוד הצלחתו לא היה לחזות תמיד נכון, אלא לשנות כיוון במהירות כשהמציאות הפריכה את דעתו.
האמור אינו מהווה ייעוץ השקעות...
t.me/financenewsbyharel
זה היה השבוע שחלף באחוזת בית
שבוע המסחר המקוצר בת"א הסתיים בירידות שערים כאשר 2 מתוך 3 ימי המסחר ננעלו במגמה שלילית
האמור אינו מהווה ייעוץ השקעות...
t.me/financenewsbyharel
🟢בשוק האג"ח, תשואת האג"ח האמריקאית ל-10 שנים נותרה סביב 5.16%, לאחר שהגיעה השבוע לרמתה הגבוהה ביותר מאז 2007. התשואה ל-30 שנה טיפסה לכ-5.49%, רמתה הגבוהה ביותר מאז 2004. העלייה בתשואות נמשכה על רקע נתוני פעילות כלכלית חזקים, לחצים אינפלציוניים והתבטאויות ניציות מצד בכירי הפד. אם זאת החוזים עדיין מתמחרים הסתברות של כ-64% להעלאת ריבית באוקטובר.
🔵במקביל, המשקיעים עקבו אחר המגעים המסחריים בין ארה"ב לסין, כאשר שתי המדינו…
וול סטריט ננעלה בעליות בשישי וסיכמה שבוע חיובי על רקע ירידת מחירי הנפט והתשואות.
📈המדדים המובילים בוול סטריט ננעלו ביום שישי בעליות, לאחר שבוע תנודתי שהושפע מעליית תשואות האג"ח והמתיחות במזרח התיכון.
📊מדד הדאו ג'ונס עלה ב-0.9%, ה-S&P 500 הוסיף 0.5% והנאסד"ק התחזק ב-0.5%.
📈בסיכום השבועי, הנאסד"ק עלה ב-2.1%, ה-S&P 500 הוסיף 1.2% והדאו ג'ונס עלה ב-0.3%, ובכך קטעה את רצף הירידות השבועיות שנמשך שלושה שבועות.
🟢מניות הט…
מוכנים ?
השבוע ה-40 של השנה כבר כאן
מה מצפה לנו השבוע?
בישראל ימי מסחר מקוצרים בשל חול המועד סוכות, המסחר יפתח כרגיל ויסתיים בשעה 14:30.
ומה בעולם?
השבוע יהיה בסימן שוק העבודה, כאשר בחמישי יתפסמו שיעורי שיעור האבטלה בגוש האירו ובשישי ה"אירוע של השבוע" שיתפרסמו נתוני שוק התעסוקה בארה"ב
בגזרת הדוחות :
נייקי ומיקרון יפרסמו בחמישי וברביעי בהתאמה את דוחותיהן
רוצים לדעת מה עוד?
כמדי שבוע הכנו במיוחד עבורכם טבלה מרכזת
…
לקראת החג:
האם היה כדאי למכור את מדד ה-S&P 500 כשהוא נפל מתחת לממוצע נע 200 יום שלו?
אחרי שביצענו את הבדיקה על מדד ת"א 125, ביצענו בדיקה דומה גם בארה"ב.
גם כאן, כדי לצמצם מעברים תכופים בין מכירה לקנייה, קבענו שהמכירה תתבצע רק כשהמדד ירד לפחות 1% מתחת לממוצע, והקנייה מחדש רק כשהוא עלה לפחות 1% מעליו.
בטבלה הראשונה: תוצאות האסטרטגיה לכל התקופה שנבדקה, החל בשנת 1928.
בטבלה השנייה: מה קרה ב-76 השנים האחרונות.
בתקופה ה…
האם אפל תרכוש מסכים לאייפון החדש ממתחרתה הגדולה?
הסכם הבלעדיות לרכישת מסכים לשלוש שנים מסמסונג דווח כבר באפריל.
עכשיו נמסר כי לפי דיווח המבוסס על המדליף Instant Digital , כי ההסכם הוא לאספקת המסכים המתקפלים ל־iPhone Duo במחיר של כ־250 דולר למסך.
זהו מחיר גבוה בהרבה מכ־70 דולר שאפל שילמה בעבר עבור מסך רגיל, והוא שווה לכשמינית ממחירו הקמעונאי של המכשיר - עוד לפני עלויות ההרכבה והבדיקה.
החברות לא אישרו או הכחישו …
פעמון נעילה עם הראל פיננסים בטלגרם
וול סטריט ננעלה בירידות קלות, תשואות האג"ח בשיא של 19 שנה והנפט מזנק
המדדים המובילים בוול סטריט נסחרו בירידות קלות, לאחר הירידות אמש, על רקע המשך העלייה בתשואות האג"ח ובמחירי הנפט.
הדאו ג'ונס ירד ב-0.3%, בעוד S&P 500 ונאסד"ק ננעלו לל"ש
תשואת האג"ח האמריקאית ל-10 שנים חצתה 5.18%, הרמה הגבוהה מאז 2007, על רקע נתוני הפעילות הכלכלית החזקים והחשש מהתמשכות האינפלציה. החוזים מתמחרים הס…
רוצים לקנות רכב חשמלי? מעולה!
רוצים להשקיע ביצרנית סינית של רכבים חשמליים? תחשבו שוב
מלחמת מחירים, עודף כושר ייצור ותחרות גוברת שחקו את רווחי יצרניות הרכב החשמלי בסין.
ההפסדים המתמשכים חייבו גיוסי הון באמצעות הנפקת מניות חדשות, שדיללו את חלקם של המשקיעים הקיימים: מספר המניות של NIO גדל ב-73% בחמש שנים.
הציפיות הגבוהות ב-2021 התחלפו באכזבה. בעוד המניות של יצרניות הסיניות ירדו, מניית טויוטה עלתה ב-78.3% בחמש שנים …
ירידות שערים בת"א על רקע המגמה השלילית אתמול והיום בניו יורק. מדד ת"א 90 ירד ב 1.8%.
מדדי ת"א אנרגיה מתחדשת ות"א תשתיות אנרגיה צנחו ב 3.7% על רקע ירידות חדות בסקטורים אלה אתמול וגם היום בניו יורק עקב הזינוק בתשואות האג"ח. מדדי הנדלן, הרגישים גם הם לתשואות, ירדו עד 2.1%.
אלקטרה נדלן – פעילה בנדלן בארה"ב וסובלת במיוחד מעליית תשואות האג"ח שם.
נופר ודוראל - מניות האנרגיה המתחדשת שבלטו היום בירידות.
האמור אינו מהווה ייעוץ…
אורקל (ORCL) יורדת ב־6.0% לאחר שהודיעה ליזמית מרכז הנתונים הענק Project Jupiter בניו מקסיקו על נסיבות של כוח עליון, במהלך שנועד להגן עליה מפני הוצאות הפרויקט.
מניית בלו אול, שהחברה הבת שלה מפתחת את המרכז, ירדה ב־3.4%, ובלום אנרג׳י, שאמורה לספק לו תאי דלק, ירדה ב־5.6%.
אנליסט של בלומברג אינטליג׳נס הזהיר כי עיכובים בהקמת המרכז עלולים לפגוע בתחזית ההכנסות של אורקל לשנים 2027–2028.
לדבריו, הפעלת קיבולת חדשה חיונית כדי…
טכנולוגיה מול מוצרי צריכה בסיסיים
בחמש השנים האחרונות הניבה קרן הטכנולוגיה XLK תשואה מצטברת של 160%, לעומת 34% בקרן מוצרי הצריכה הבסיסיים XLP.
הקו בגרף מציג את היחס בין הקרנות: כשהוא עולה, XLK מציגה ביצועים טובים יותר ביחס ל־XLP.
עם החברות הבולטות ב־XLK נמנות אנבידיה, אפל, מיקרוסופט, AMD וברודקום.
ב־XLP נמצאות בין היתר וולמארט, קוסטקו, פרוקטר אנד גמבל, קוקה־קולה ופיליפ מוריס.
היחס טיפס בחדות מאז 2017, אך ב־2022,…
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 343 posts we hold for @financenewsbyharel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@financenewsbyharel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
6 September 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
תחום הדרקונים 🐉 Dragon Sphere @dragonsphere · 6,647#80
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
אינטראקטיב ישראל @interactiveil · 27,739 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 September 2026
שוק ההון - השקעות, מסחר ועדכונים TradingIL @TradingIL · 28,016 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
גיקטיים Geektime - ערוץ חדשות הטכנולוגיה וההייטק של ישראל @geektimecoil · 25,507 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
טיסות סודיות @SecretFlights · 114,974 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
כלכליסט @calcalist · 30,009 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 September 2026
אפוק - מגזין | חדשות | פרשנויות - Epoch @MagEpoch · 92,179 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 16 August 2026
חדשות מזג אוויר בטלגרם @Weather_newsil · 55,219 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“הראל פיננסים - חדשות שוק ההון” (@financenewsbyharel), 37,881 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/financenewsbyharel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.