9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -29. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,325–9,364 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 07:37
9,330
-4
24 Aug 2026, 03:53
9,334
-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:36
9,335
+6
17 Aug 2026, 20:34
9,329
-10
14 Aug 2026, 14:16
9,339
-13
10 Aug 2026, 20:28
9,352
-6
7 Aug 2026, 15:17
9,358
-1
7 Aug 2026, 00:00
9,359
no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:55
9,359
first reading
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
13.6%
avg views ÷ 9,330 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,270
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.295%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 66 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held
78 (30 July 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total
98,748
Reactions total
246
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
246 reactions across 65 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
63
25.6%
😢
48
19.5%
🔥
39
15.9%
😁
33
13.4%
👍
29
11.8%
👏
28
11.4%
🎉
6
2.44%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 78 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 246reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 78 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ברנשטיין: ביטקוין יגיע ל-150 אלף דולר עד 2027
בית ההשקעות מפרסם תחזית שאפתנית למחיר הביטקוין על רקע "עסקת הפיחות" הגלובלית, אך מקצץ את יעד המחיר למניית סטרטג' ל-350 דולר
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/bitcoin-news/bernstein-bitcoin-150k-2027
רבולוט משיקה את EURR: מטבע יציב צמוד יורו
המטבע יונפק ע"י חברת Bridge ויושק תחילה ב-3 מדינות באיחוד, במטרה להתחרות בדומיננטיות של סירקל בענף הסטייבלקוינס
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/stablecoins/revolut-eurr-euro-stablecoin
ארה"ב מרחיבה את הסנקציות על תעשיית הקריפטו באיראן
וושינגטון מעלה הילוך במאבק בעקיפת הסנקציות ומאיימת לנתק מהמערכת הפיננסית כל גורם גלובלי שימשיך לעבוד מול איראן
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/crypto-regulation/usa-dday-iran-crypto-sanctions
איש עסקים מלאס וגאס הורשע בתרמית קריפטו בהיקף של $24,000,000
ברנט קובאר נמצא אשם בהונאת 400 משקיעים ובשימוש בכספיהם למימון אורח חייו הראוותניים וכעת עומד בפני עונש מאסר כבד בנבאדה
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/crypto-news/las-vegas-crypto-ponzi-conviction
ביטקוין מזנק ל-$81,000 על רקע תוכנית הרכישות של ממשלת ארה"ב
מהלך רכישות החוב של משרד האוצר האמריקאי החליש את הדולר והוביל לזרימות שיא לקרנות הסל לצד הנזלות פוזיציות שורט בהיקף של מיליארדי דולרים
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/crypto-news/bitcoin-surges-81k-debasement-trade
סטרטג'י מגדילה את רזרבת המזומנים לשיא של $5,100,000,000
למרות הזינוק במחיר הביטקוין, החברה לא רכשה מטבעות השבוע והקצתה 1.59 מיליארד דולר לבריכת נזילות חדשה בשם "USD Cash"
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/bitcoin-news/strategy-no-bitcoin-purchase-cash-reserve
טטר מבטלת את פרויקט כריית הביטקוין באורוגוואי לאחר השקעה בסך 120 מיליון דולר
מנפיקת USDT מודיעה כי עקב מחלוקת מול חברת החשמל הממשלתית על היקף האספקה יסגרו שני אתרי הכרייה
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/crypto-news/tether-uruguay-bitcoin-mining-project
האם התחתית בשוק הביטקוין והקריפטו... מאחורינו?!
השבוע האחרון נצבע בירוק בוהק, והזכיר ימי עבר בשוק הקריפטו.
זינוק של עשרות אחוזים בימים בודדים הוביל את ביטקוין ל-$79,500, את אתריום ל-$2,550, את ריפל ל-$1.65, את סולאנה ל-$100 ואת זיקאש לשיאים חדשים.
האם העליות הדרמטיות האלו למעשה מעידות שהתחתית בשוק הקריפטו מאחורינו, או שמא אנחנו עדיין בסיכון לבקר נמוך יותר מה-$57,800?
בסרטון השבועי בן סמוחה נותן את הניתוח המלא שלו…
❤2🔥2
Signed Ben Samocha (Will not DM, verify handle @sbens)
ללא פריצת קוד: 8.5 מיליון ד' נגנבו מ-Term Finance
חולשה מבנית בפרוטוקול אפשרה לתוקף להשיג רוב בהצבעות בעלות צנועה ולמשוך את יתרות האתריום ו-USDC
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/ethereum-news/eth-term-finance-protocol-hack
מיליארד משתמשי קריפטו בדרך: סוכני ה-AI משתלטים על הארנק הדיגיטלי
סוכני הבינה המלאכותית כבר מתחילים לסחור ולשלם בעצמם ברשת, אך האנליסטים מזהירים שהמשקיעים לא בהכרח ירוויחו מזה
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/crypto-news/ai-agents-crypto-payments-bitcoin/
זיקאש מזנק 62% בשבוע ל-790 דולר
צבירת היצע מוסדית ומהלך להמרת קרן הנאמנות של גרייסקייל לקרן סל דוחפים את ZEC לשיא של שמונה שנים
לכתבה >>
https://www.cryptojungle.co.il/crypto-market/zcash-zec-grayscale-etf
🔥3❤2😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @bensamocha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 477,994 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“חדשות קריפטו ובלוקצ׳יין - CryptoJungle” (@bensamocha), 9,330 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bensamocha.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.