Channel
@fazaelvamaaref
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,595subscribers
+5 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001005340442 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fazaelvamaaref |
| Created | 28 October 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fazaelvamaaref |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 2,595 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 2,596 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 2,594 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 2,596 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:21 | 2,590 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 19:33 | 2,590 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,527 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❌ این سخنان سخيف و سست و بیاساس، اتّهامی است به بزرگان ما، از شیخ صدوق تا محدّث قمّی رحمهم الله (ایکاش به دست مسئولین مربوطه برسد و این نادان بیسواد را توبیخ کنند و بجای عمامه، کلاه بر سرش بگذارند) 👈🏻 این بزرگان غيرت دینی نداشتند، فقط ایشان که معلوم نیست کجا و چه درسی خوانده، غیرت دینی دارد!!! واقعا ربط زندگی حضرت رقیه و عروسی قاسم بن الحسن عليهم السّلام به اصل بحث برائت چیست ⁉️ آیا از شیخ صدوق تا محدّث قمّی که …
Video, posted without a caption
گزارشی از احکام ازدواج و طلاق و ارث در ایران ساسانی که با آمدن اسلام برچیده شد 📚سعید نفیسی، تاریخ اجتماعی ایران از انقراض ساسانیان تا انقراض امویان، پارسه، ۱۳۹۰، ص۴۱-۵۲ @AlAsar_1
↪️ پیرو مطالب قبل 🔥 ناصبی معاصر، "طه الدُلَيمي" که مانند اسلافش، خوراکش اهانت به امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسّلام است، میگوید: "حسن بن علی در تمام امور با پدرش مخالف بود، از بحث بیعت تا جنگهایی که پدرش داشت، لذا با معاویه بیعت و توافق نمود."❗️ (این ادعای سخيف در مطلب قبل بررسی شد) اهانت این ناصبی به امیرالمؤمنین علیهالسّلام اهانت این ناصبی به امام حسین علیه السّلام @fazaelvamaaref
👆🏻 نزد شیعه واضح است که ایشان از نسل امام حسین علیه السّلام است و همین برای ما کافیست. ولی از آنجایی که در پی اثباتِ شیطنتِ مخالفین هستیم، باید گفت: در مخالفین نیز، افرادی مانند نعیم بن حماد المروزی، از راویان قرن سوّم، در کتاب "الفتن" و کنجی شافعی در "البیان" و مقدسی شافعی در "عقدالدرر" و ابن قتیبه در "غريبالحديث" و ابن ابیالحدید در "شرح نهج البلاغه" و ابونعیم اصفهانی در "صفةالمهدی" و طبرانی در "المعجمالکبیر" ب…
👆🏻 هرکس اندک سر و کاری با روایات شیعه و مخالفین داشته باشد، متوجه جعل و تحریف این گزارشات میشود، و شیطنت و خباثت ناقلان را درمییابد. ➖ أولا: امام حسن علیه السّلام، معاویه ملعون را بی اصل و نسب و منافق و شرور میدانست (بعنوان نمونه: شرح نهج البلاغه، ابن أبي الحديد، ج ۴ ص ۴۰٧) و هیچگاه خلافت را به او واگذار نکرد تا برای این از خودگذشتگی، نسلش لایق خلافت شوند. بلکه خلافت را حق محض خود میدانست، ولی از روی ناچاری و ش…
👆🏻 طبق گزارشی دیگر که در کتب مخالفین آمده: «از آنجا که معاویه میدانست امام حسن علیه السّلام مانند پدرش در پی جنگ و فتنه نیست، بعد از شهادت امیرالمؤمنین عليه السّلام، پیغامی برای ایشان فرستاد و پنهانی مذاکره و مصالحه شد و امام خلافت را به او سپرد ... اما ماجرا اینجا جالب میشود: در همان حین، امام حسن به امام حسین علیهما السّلام میفرماید: من میخواهم خلافت را به معاویه بسپارم، زیرا فتنه و ریختن خون مسلمین و دشمنی ب…
👆🏻 این نگونبخت خوب میداند که راه امام حسین از امام حسن علیهما السّلام جدا نیست، و مطابق نقل همکیشانش، رسول اکرم صلی الله علیه و آله فرمودهاند: حسن و حسین امام هستند، چه قیام کنند، چه نکنند. ولی چون امامش يزيد است، از عدمبیعت امام ما، آتش گرفته است؛ ضمن اینکه امام حسن علیه السّلام خلافت را رها نکرد، بلکه به دلیل شرایط عصر خود، مصالحهای کرد که نفعش کم از جهاد و قتال نبود. باید دانست که سُنّیان، امام حسن را مخالفِ…
#مهدویت #سانسور_تحریف #عاشورا_در_عامه 🔥 اهانت و بیادبی "ابن قیّم جوزيه" به ساحت مقدّس امام حسین علیه السّلام 👈🏻 وی که شاگرد #ابن_تیمیه است، مانند استادِ ناصبیمسلکِ هتّاکش، پرده از خباثت خود برداشته و هنگام بحث از منجی و قائم اهل بیت علیهم السّلام، میگوید: "قویترین قول در اینباره آن است که منجی و قائم، از نسل حسن بن علی است، و در این مسئله سرّی لطیف است، زیرا او خلافت و دنیا را برای رضای خدا رها کرد و خداوند ن…
✳️ جدیدترین اثر پیرامون شرح نهجالبلاغه ابنابیالحدید منتشر شد. 🔸عنوان: «مع ابن ابی الحدید فی شرحه». 🔸مولف: حجتالاسلام و المسلمین علی خادمی 🔸این اثر توسط بنیاد معارف اسلامی در ۴۸۳ و در قطع وزیری گالینگور منتشر شده است. 🔸تقریظ آیتاللهالعظمی سبحانی، علامه کورانی، استاد سیداحمد اشکوری و استاد نظریمنفرد، حکایت از اتقان کتاب و مفید بودن آن دارد. 🔸کتاب در ۵ موضوع اصلی سامان یافته است: _ معتبر بودن نهجالبلاغه و ف…
👈🏻 در مناسبات مذهبی و ایام شهادت هر امام معصوم علیه السّلام، فقط یک تذکر میدادند: "موضوع منبرتان، مسائل سیاسی نباشد، از امامی بگوئید که مجلس به نام ایشان است." ❗️وقتی میگوئیم بعض افراد کاسه داغتر از آش هستند، دقیقا یعنی همین. @fazaelvamaaref
👈🏻 زیارت رسول اکرم صلی الله علیه و آله و اهل بیت علیهم السّلام، از راه دور، در روز جمعه 📗 ربيع الأسابيع، مرحوم مجلسی، ص٨٠، به نقل از "مصباح المتهجّد" @fazaelvamaaref
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fazaelvamaaref. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شراب میفروخت، قاتل و ناصبی بود، گماشته ابن زیاد ملعون بود و مردم را به قتل امام حسین علیه السّلام دعوت مینمود، اما بخاری و مسلم از وی روایت نقل کردهاند! (براستی چرا بخاری و مسلم از چنین افرادی روایت نقل کردهاند؟)
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 264,154 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فضائل و معارف” (@fazaelvamaaref), 2,595 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fazaelvamaaref.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.