Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⚫ حسینیه مجازی بُکاء ⚫

@ashkvareh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,302subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001090321201
TypeChannel
Username@ashkvareh
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ashkvareh

Growth

2,2812,3022,291.56 August 2026 — 2,281 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,281 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,282 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,297 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,302 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,278–2,305 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:262,302+5
9 Aug 2026, 18:422,297+15
6 Aug 2026, 15:402,282+1
6 Aug 2026, 05:522,281no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:202,281first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.5%
avg views ÷ 2,302 subscribers
Avg views / post
404
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
27
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held27 (30 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total10,895
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 06s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 02:37 UTC197 viewsread 7 August 2026

#اصحاب‌الحسین_علیه‌السلام ⚠️ تذکر یک خطا ⚠️ گلایه از یک جفا https://t.me/Bandani1/1036

7 Aug 2026, 02:03 UTC197 viewsread 7 August 2026

🌱 در باب آداب مداحی و مرثیه‌سرایی ✍️برگی از سفرنامه سید هبة الدین شهرستانی: در ۱۲ ذی القعده [۱۳۳۰.ق] در العمارة، بزرگان شهر از شیعه و سنی نزد ما جمع شدند. در بینشان شیخ طاهر، شاعر العمارة حضور داشت؛ بلند شد و سروده‌ای از خود در مدح [امام] حسین علیه‌السلام خواند: سَكِرتُ بحُبِّهِما ما صَحَوتُ وفيه لِواءَ خُطوبي لَوَيتُ (از عشق آن دو مست شدم و به هوش نیامدم و در آن بیرق مصائبم را پیچیدم). از من خواست شعر را اصلاح کن

6 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC269 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

🎙 مرحوم شیخ محمد رضا جعفری: ❌ امام حسین علیه السّلام را به رونق مجلس نفروشید! ▪️خاطره‌ای از روش متقن مرحوم شیخ عباس قمی در روضه‌خوانی که بدون هیچ پیرایه‌ای مجلس را متحوّل می‌کرد @ashkvareh

6 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC269 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📢 آثار و برکاتِ #زیارت امام حسین علیه السّلام، برگرفته از روایات شریف اهل بیت علیهم السّلام @ashkvareh

6 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC263 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

#آداب_مداحی 👈🏻 حقیر در همین کانال، به چند مورد از مطالب آقای #خزاعی انتقاد کرده‌ام، ولی این کلام ایشان در نقد بعض مادحین، دقیق و کاملا به جاست @ashkvareh

6 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC439 viewsread 7 August 2026

❌ این سخنان سخيف و سست و بی‌اساس، اتّهامی است به بزرگان ما، از شیخ صدوق تا محدّث قمّی رحمهم الله (ای‌کاش به دست مسئولین مربوطه برسد و این نادان بیسواد را توبیخ کنند و بجای عمامه، کلاه بر سرش بگذارند) 👈🏻 این بزرگان غيرت دینی نداشتند، فقط ایشان که معلوم نیست کجا و چه درسی خوانده، غیرت دینی دارد!!! واقعا ربط زندگی حضرت رقیه و عروسی قاسم بن الحسن عليهم السّلام به اصل بحث برائت چیست ⁉️ آیا از شیخ صدوق تا محدّث قمّی که

5 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTC450 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

اوج بی‌دقتی و تحریف در مقتل‌نگاری و مقتل‌خوانی که خسارت عظیمی به بار آورد:

  1. از قرن ششم به بعد رخ داد14%
  2. در عصر صفویه رخ داد32%
  3. در عصر قاجار رخ داد54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 00:46 UTC516 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

#زیارت #آداب_زیارت #آداب_مداحی 🎥 آموزش فرهنگ #اربعین در مدّاحی | باسم کربلائی @ashkvareh

2 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC546 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#حزن #جزع #اشک 🚫 بعض سخنرانان و تحلیل‌گران می‌گویند: "هيأتی که فعالیت اجتماعی_سیاسی نداشته باشد، مانند صندوق قرض‌الحسنه و تهیه جهیزیه و برنامه‌های سیاسی و امثالهم، به درد نمی‌خورد." 👈🏻 این حرفها غلط زیادی بیش نیست، بلکه اهانت به اهل بیت علیهم السّلام است که خلاف این را آموخته‌اند. بنای هیأت، حدیث و اشک و عزاست، اهل بیت علیهم السّلام اینگونه به ما آموخته و توصیه فرموده‌اند. هرچه در روایات و سیره اهل بیت علیهم السّل

2 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC483 viewsread 7 August 2026
File

#آداب_مداحی #صوت ❌ تیترش با شما: ایجاد رعب و وحشت در مستمعین؟! تیتراژ فیلم ترسناک؟! مسابقه مبهم‌خوانی؟! مراسم با زبانی ناشناخته؟! ❗️(البته‌ اگر انتقاد ما، توهین به شعائر و بساط امام حسین علیه السّلام نباشد) @ashkvareh

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @ashkvareh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 10:25 UTCAnonymous Quiz182 voters

اوج بی‌دقتی و تحریف در مقتل‌نگاری و مقتل‌خوانی که خسارت عظیمی به بار آورد:

  1. از قرن ششم به بعد رخ داد14%
  2. در عصر صفویه رخ داد32%
  3. در عصر قاجار رخ داد54%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 123,495 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⚫ حسینیه مجازی بُکاء ⚫” (@ashkvareh), 2,302 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ashkvareh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.