معرفی ناشر: کتاب کتیبهشناسی و نظریه در مطالعه اسلام آغازین؛ نوشته ایلکا لینستت مطالعات گردآمده در این کتاب به بررسی گروهها و مفاهیم دینی در عربستانِ عصر باستان متأخر (حدود ۱۵۰ تا ۷۵۰ میلادی) میپردازد و در این مسیر، بهویژه بر کتیبهها و دیگر منابع همعصر تکیه دارد. این پژوهشها پویاییهای دینی و اجتماعی عربستان را در این دوره سرنوشتساز از تاریخ جهان واکاوی میکنند. اسلام نه در خلأ پدید آمد و نه پدیدهای کاملاً …

Channel
مکتبة نفس الرسول المصطفی
@rasullib
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,886subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002131895403 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rasullib |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rasullib |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 1,886 | +20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 1,866 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:47 | 1,871 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 1,871 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 131.4%
- avg views ÷ 1,886 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,480
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.313%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (27 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,833 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
49 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 49 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📚 Epigraphy and Theory in the Study of Early Islam ✍🏻 Ilkka Lindstedt Routledge, 2026 📚 کتیبهشناسی و نظریه در مطالعه اسلام آغازین ✍🏻 ایلکا لینستت https://t.me/rasullib
از مصادر مهم و کمیاب مرحوم صاحب عبقات رضواناللهعلیه که سال ۱۴۴۵ هـ چاپ شده است. ردّیه شمس الأئمّة الكَردَري بر کتاب المنخول غزالي همراه با کتاب المنخول @rasullib
❤4
❤️به زیورها بیآرایند وقتی خوبرویان را تو سیمینتن چنان خوبی، که زیورها بیآرایی¹ 🔶غياث الدين محمّد بن محمّد بن عبد الله ابن العاقولي الواسطي البغدادي(٧٩٧ هـ) در کتاب الدراية في معرفة الرواية(مشيخة ابن العاقولي)در شرح حال شیخ و والد خود محييالدين محمد بن عبد الله ابن العاقولي(۷۶۸ هـ) از پدرش(محيي الدين العاقولي) نقل کرد که گفت: 🕋 با پدرم جمال الدین العاقولي(۷۲۸ هـ) به حجّ مشرّف شدیم، در مسیر، هنگامی که به محلّ قبر…
❤15
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
شایان ذکر است نسخه پیش از انتشار رسمی این کتاب به واسطه شهید مصباحالهدی باقری کنی به دست رهبر عظیم الشأن شهید رسید و ایشان، مؤلّف کتاب را با مرقومهای کریمانه مورد لطف قرار دادند و هدایایی شامل مصحف شریف، انگشتر، عبا و وجه نقد نیز به وی اهدا فرمودند. شاید متن دستخط مبارک ایشان را در زمانی مناسب منتشر کنیم.
#صدر_حدیثا #تازههای_چاپ 📖 عنوان کتاب: ابن الجوزي، سياسة الكيل بمكيالين 🖌نویسنده: محمود إبراهیم فراهاني 🔶 زبان کتاب: عربی 🔅 موضوع کتاب: بررسی و نقد منهج ابنجوزی(۵۹۷ هـ) عالم پرآوزه حنبلی قرن ششم در تضعیف و توثیق راویان و تصحیح و تضعیف روایات اهلسنّت؛ نگارنده، این اثر را به عنوان تتمّهای بر مباحث کتاب شریف عبقات الأنوار در نقد ابنجوزی نگاشته و مطالعه آن برای محقّقان علوم اسلامی در زمینه تاریخ رجال و حدیث و علا…
محبّ الخطیب در طول زندگی خود در زمینه علمی، اجتماعی و سیاسی در تنقیص تشیّع و شیعیان، بلکه اهلبیت علیهمالسلام تلاشهای فراوانی کرد که از جمله آنها تحقیق و انتشار همین کتاب ذهبی و همچنین کتاب العواصم من القواصم ابن العربي المالكي(۵۴۳ هـ) بوده و از همین رو دکتر محمود سعید ممدوح شافعی، محدّث معاصر مصری، در کتاب تشنيف الأسماع بشيوخ الإجازة والسماع، ٢/٩٩ در تیترِ شرح حال او چنین گفته: "...الناصبي المشهور..." @rasullib
❤3
از مهمترین دلایل ناصبیگری شمس الدین ذهبی(۷۴۸ هـ)، اختصار و تلخیص کتاب منهاج السنّة تأليف استادش ابن تیمیه(۷۲۸ هـ) میباشد. این اثر با تحقیق محبّ الدین الخطیب(۱۳۸۹ هـ) بارها چاپ شده است. نکته قابل توجّه این است که محبّ الخطیب بارها در متن تلخیص ذهبی دست برده و عبارات را تغییر داده است و گاه به این تغییرات در پاورقی اشاره کرده است. وی در اقدامی عجیب حدود ۱۳ صفحه به متن تلخیص ذهبی از اصل آن یعنی منهاج السنة اضافه کرده …
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
#صدر_حدیثا #تازههای_چاپ ابن الجوزي سياسة الكيل بمكيالين؛ علمای شیعه در مباحث "امامتِ نقلی"، از گذشته تاکنون برای اثبات افضلیت و امامت امیرالمؤمنین صلواتاللهعلیه به احادیث موجود در مصادر عامّه احتجاج کردهاند و طرف مقابل نیز سعی کرده آن احادیث را با تضعیف سند یا تأویل متن، از درجه اعتبار ساقط کند. یکی از پاسخهای پرتکرار ایشان در تضعیف اسنادِ این دسته احادیث، این است که میگویند: "ذَکَر ابنُ الجوزي هذا الحديثَ …
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @rasullib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 12,128 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@AmirMoezzi · 3,0151 postفضائل و معارف
@fazaelvamaaref · 2,5961 postحامد کاشانى
@kashani1395 · 40,5571 postمرکز فروش کتب حامد کاشانی
@kashani_book · 3891 postبر ساحل عبقات
@mir_hamedhoseyn_110 · 1,4671 postانجمن مطالعات نهج البلاغه ایران
@nahjalbalaghah_ir · 2111 postسید محمد مدنی
@s_mmadani · 2101 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مکتبة نفس الرسول المصطفی” (@rasullib), 1,886 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rasullib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.