Channel
@soal_dokhtaroneh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
88,853subscribers
+27,681 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001871515309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soal_dokhtaroneh |
| Description | زیر ۱۸ سال درخواست نده🔞💦 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soal_dokhtaroneh |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:57 | 88,853 | -1,732 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 90,585 | -763 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 91,348 | -476 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:37 | 91,824 | -445 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:21 | 92,269 | -700 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 92,969 | -1,092 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 13:18 | 94,061 | -1,367 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 09:16 | 95,428 | -1,097 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:24 | 96,525 | -676 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:04 | 97,201 | -650 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:35 | 97,851 | -801 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:04 | 98,652 | -841 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 99,493 | -801 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 100,294 | -1,045 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 101,339 | -1,361 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 102,700 | -890 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:32 | 103,590 | +3,320 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 100,270 | +4,971 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:24 | 95,299 | +7,744 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 09:13 | 87,555 | first reading |
496 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 146 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 172 of 262 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 496 (4 August 2026 – 2 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,005,231 |
| Reactions total | 10,567 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 2 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 2 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
22,047 reactions across 340 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😐 | 9,870 | 44.8% | |
| 🤣 | 6,326 | 28.7% | |
| 😭 | 5,851 | 26.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 344 of the 496 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,047 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 496 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @soal_dokhtaroneh. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 496 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 2 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
سلام! 👋 روزانه ۵۰۰هزار تا ۱میلیون تومان با همکاری باما کسبدرآمد کنید!💰 ابزار نیاز فقط یک تلفن 📱 آموزشها کاملاً رایگان بدونپرداخت هزینه. 🆓 دریافت قرارداد رسمی .📄 توجه بفرمایید پذیرش محدود است. برای اطلاعات بیشتر و همکاری با ما، به ID زیر پیام بدید: @tisa_gostar @tisa_gostar @tisa_gostar
#سوال خواهشا بحث متفرقه نکنید اگه نمیتونید جواب بدید و اذیت میشید اصلا نخونید سوالم در مورد گواهی سلامته چرا بعضی از پزشکان برگه سلامت به خودت تنها نمیدن؟ کسی مثلا قبل از نامزدیش پنهانی بخواد بگیره و هنوز مجرد باشه نمیتونه بگیره؟شنیدم بعضیاشون با امضای شاهد و نامزد برگه میدن من کاری با اینا ندارم میخوام ببینم که طبیعیه این رفتارشون یا وقتی توانایی تشخیص ندارن اینو میگن این سواله که برای من مهمه و حتما واجبه که دارم…
😐2
#سوال سلام دخترم ۱۹ تو حجاب با پدرم خیلی مشکل دارم سر شال داشتن نداشتن من دوست دارم نداشته باشم ولی اون میخواد داشته باشم همیشه بیرون رفتنی حجاب ندارم ، باپدرم بیرون نمیرم بخاطر مسئله حجاب چون بشدت متنفرم از شال مشکلمون همینه و اینکه من سرکار میرم شاغلم هرجا میرم کار، یواشکی یروز رندوم میاد چک کنه که ببینه چطور میرم میام دیوونم کرده در صورتی که من کار خاصی نمیکنم چیکار میتونم بکنم؟؟؟😔 خواهشا نگید خوبتو میخواد …
😭21😐1
👀 ایتالیا × فرانسه؛ این یکی بیشتر شبیه دعوای شخصیتهاست تا یه بازی معمولی... ایتالیا میخواد بازی رو حسابشده و بینقص جلو ببره؛ فرانسه هم فقط چند متر فضا میخواد تا با سرعتش ضربه بزنه. 🇮🇹⚔️🇫🇷 بازیِ صبر ایتالیا میبره یا انفجار فرانسه؟
#سوال سلام نامزد کردم نامزدم ۲۹ خودم ۲۵ یه چیز عجیبی که حسش کردم اینه که نامزدم وقتی راست میکنه اوکیه نعوذ میمونه مشکلی نیست ولی خیلی راحت میتونه کنترلش کنه مگه نمیگن پسرا وقتی حشری میشن حتما باید خالی شن وگرنه همیشه اذیتن و از این حرفا اما نامزد من خیلی خیلی راحت با این قضیه کنار میاد به نظر خودم عجیب اومد میخواستم بپرسم از نظر پسرا اوکیه مشکلی نیست؟ @soal_dokhtaroneh
🤣36
الان طلا بفروشیم یا بخریم ک سود کنیم؟
دیدم طلا و دلار تند تند میره بالا خواستم طلا بخرم دخترعموم گفت نخر ارزون میشه به حرفش گوش ندادم ۱۰ تومن ضرر کردم گفتم از کجا میدونستی گفت تو مگه اینجا نیستی؟💰 OnlineTala
#سوال سلام دوستان من یه مشکلی دارم میخواستم ببینم بقیه هم اینجوری هستن یا نه با هر پسری که آشنا و همکلام میشم یهو سردم میشه بدنم بدون دلیل میلرزه و تپش قلب میگیرم و خیلی بد اخلاقی میکنم حالا بیچاره ها فکر میکنن کلا بداخلاقم دیگه این مشکل کلافم کرده راهکاری سراغ دارین؟😭 @soal_dokhtaroneh
😐20🤣4😭2
آلمان اسم بزرگتره، ولی صربستان از اون تیمهاست که اگه بازی رو فیزیکی کنه، همهچی کثیف و سخت میشه. 👀 ژرمنها دنبال فوتبال مرتب و سریعن؛ صربها دنبال اینن که اصلاً نذارن بازی مرتب پیش بره. همین تضاد میتونه بازی رو خیلی جذاب کنه. 🇷🇸⚔️🇩🇪 تو روی کیفیت آلمان حساب میکنی یا سماجت صربستان؟
#سوال من یه خاله دارم ۳۸ سالشه و شوهرش ۴۲ یه دختر ۹ ساله هم دارن شوهر خالم خیلی آدم خسیس و بد دهنیه هیچ وقت به خالم پول نداد همیشه تحقیرش میکرد خالمم همه این سال ها فقط تحمل کرد چون کسی کمکش نمیکرد طلاق بگیره همه بهش میگفتن باهاش بساز به خاطر دخترت تا اینکه فهمیدیم خالم با یه پیر مرد ۶۳ ساله آشنا شده و پیرمرده خیلی دوسش داره و شدیدا وابسته اش شده گفته همه جوره پشتت هستم که طلاق بگیری و همین یکی دو هفته پیش، خالم کل…
😐37🤣3
هلند توپ میخواد؛ یونان زمان 💥 یه طرف تیمی که میخواد از همون اول ریتم رو بالا ببره، یه طرف تیمی که عجله نمیکنه و منتظر اشتباه حریف میمونه. 👀🔥 کدوم تیم بازی رو به سبک خودش میبره؟ ⚽️
#سوال سلام دخترم لطفا میشه بگید برا کوچیک تر شدن سینه چیکار باید بکنیم؟ @soal_dokhtaroneh
😐37🤣15😭10
Showing the 12 most recent of 496 posts we hold for @soal_dokhtaroneh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@soal_dokhtaroneh named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سوالای دخترونه !” (@soal_dokhtaroneh), 88,853 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soal_dokhtaroneh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.