Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FactFlicks

Channel

FactFlicks

@fact_spacts

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

80,598subscribers

+44,732 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002522290911
TypeChannel
Username@fact_spacts
DescriptionQuick, quirky, and surprising facts that flick through your brain and stick.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fact_spacts

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

34,400 average views per post against 69,064 subscribers — an engagement rate of 49.8%. Across the 3,503 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,629–99,976 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.78% and 11.2%, with a median of 5.00%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured90 of 90 published in the window (0 exact, 90 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled3,094,100
Mature posts only49.7% over 86 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers69,064 measured 5 November 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 3,503 channels · p10 0.479% · p25 1.78% · p50 5.00% · p75 11.2% · p90 20.2%
Position in cohort99.115th percentile · 10.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.043% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

35,86680,59858,23210 August 202613 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 94 days, net +44,732. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,156–87,308 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 00:5680,598+4,232
10 Nov 2026, 19:1076,366+3,254
9 Nov 2026, 09:2073,112+511
8 Nov 2026, 02:0872,601+1,163
6 Nov 2026, 23:5971,438+1,211
5 Nov 2026, 22:5070,227+1,163
5 Nov 2026, 02:0769,064+2,235
4 Nov 2026, 02:1566,829+1,164
3 Nov 2026, 02:1965,665-514
1 Nov 2026, 23:1666,179-1,183
31 Oct 2026, 22:2767,362-1,177
30 Oct 2026, 22:2968,539-317
29 Oct 2026, 23:3668,856-343
28 Oct 2026, 23:5969,199-428
27 Oct 2026, 23:5669,627-190
26 Oct 2026, 23:1669,817-149
25 Oct 2026, 23:1669,966+1,579
24 Oct 2026, 21:2868,387+3,413
23 Oct 2026, 19:0764,974+150
22 Oct 2026, 20:1864,824first reading

Engagement

309 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 221 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.9%
avg views ÷ 80,598 subscribers
Avg views / post
41,800
91 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.67%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
91
of 309 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held309 (4 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total3,804,400
Reactions total63,476
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 02:43 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈404
Videos
≈1,230
Links
≈1,650

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 26m
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 239 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

89,564 reactions across 309 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.29% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,7375.29%
🎉2,5662.86%
😇2,4782.77%
🦄2,4642.75%
🐳2,4562.74%
🎃2,4502.74%
🔥2,4492.73%
🤷2,4332.72%
🤗2,4252.71%
🍓2,4162.70%
👌2,3952.67%
😁2,3502.62%
🏆2,3382.61%
💯2,2622.53%
😎2,2492.51%
🤓2,2312.49%
🎄2,1532.40%
🍾2,1322.38%
👍2,1242.37%
🌭2,0932.34%
34 further kinds40,36345.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 309 of the 309 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89,564 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 309 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
0.324%
1 of 309 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
40,700
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
21,800
over 308 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 309 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 91 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈40,700 views231 reactionsread 15 November 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

📜 History isn’t dead. It’s just been redacted. 🧨 What if the truth was stranger than fiction? 🕵️‍♂️ @rawhistory — RawPast tears the filter off the past: ⚔️ Brutal battles. Uncensored revolutions. 👑 Forgotten rulers. Banned ideas. Suppressed documents. 🧠 Real stories that textbooks skipped 🕯 From ancient empires to Cold War secrets 🚫 No sugarcoating. No classroom fluff. 🔥 Just raw, powerful, mind-warping history…

👌34👎28😘25🎄22🤝20🍾19🏆19😨19

14 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTC≈47,300 views281 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

A direct route from Alaska to India can cross the ocean without touching land. On a spheroid, that path follows a geodesic: the shortest curve between two points on the surface. Because the surface is curved, the shortest route appears as an arc rather than a straight line on a flat map. FactFlicks

👀35🙏32😘30😢27🤓26👌25😡25👎24

14 Nov 2026, 11:08 UTC≈46,900 views292 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

The abacus finger theory lets you do mental arithmetic using special finger combinations. FactFlicks

👍36🤷31😎31🎃29🤩28😁26💋25😍25

14 Nov 2026, 06:10 UTC≈42,600 views268 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Critical heat flux occurs when a nuclear fuel rod begins to overheat and can no longer transfer additional heat to the surrounding water. FactFlicks

🤬34🦄29🤓27😡27😍24⚡23🤝23🌚22

13 Nov 2026, 16:08 UTC≈54,800 views544 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

How can a mirror show an object that isn’t behind it? It may seem obvious, but the mirror reflects light from the direction you’re viewing it. The image comes from the part of the mirror beside the apparent reflection, not from behind it. FactFlicks

🍓60🔥57😈55👎51🎃50😡48🤷47😁47

13 Nov 2026, 11:04 UTC≈50,500 views395 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

In some Dutch nursing homes, one small change is helping people with dementia feel at home again. First, staff put life-size images of residents’ original front doors on their current room entrances. Then, familiar colors, shapes, and details stand out among rows of similar doors, making rooms easier to recognize and reducing disorientation. Known as True Doors, the custom decals can also help preserve personal mem…

🎄46🍌45😍44🤣39❤37🎉37😎31😘31

13 Nov 2026, 06:12 UTC≈41,800 views215 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Did you know some people are born in ways that are truly unique? Here are 7 remarkable places around the world where that happens. FactFlicks

🎄34🎉29❤26🍌22😍21🤩15🎃14🤮14

12 Nov 2026, 16:09 UTC≈52,600 views456 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

How vast is the Universe? Its observable part stretches about 9.2 x 10⁲⁶ meters across. At the other extreme lies the Planck length: around 1.6 x 10⁻³⁵ meters, the smallest scale where our current laws of physics may still apply. From the tiniest frontier to the cosmic horizon, the scale is staggering. FactFlicks

😴56🎄50😇46🙉46😭42👎40🍓39❤38

12 Nov 2026, 11:11 UTC≈53,600 views512 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

1,500+ 3D models of animals and plants are now available from Kyushu University. They were created using photogrammetry, which builds models from digital photos taken at multiple angles. FactFlicks

❤62🌭59😇54🦄51👍50🍌43👏43🍾41

12 Nov 2026, 06:07 UTC≈40,800 views221 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Kia’s manufacturing plant in Andhra Pradesh, India. FactFlicks

🍾30🍌27👍24😁24😴22😇20👌19⚡15

11 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC≈51,900 views1,059 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

Power lines can light a bulb held in your hand. How does it work? FactFlicks

❤119🤩106😱104🏆97🤓96💯95😨92🎉90

11 Nov 2026, 11:05 UTC≈53,000 views1,272 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

How can a coaster-sized piece of glass hold nearly 5 terabytes of data? It stores the information without needing power to keep it. FactFlicks

❤129🍌127🤝127🤩122💯120🎄118🤷114😁113

Showing the 12 most recent of 309 posts we hold for @fact_spacts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 55 posts on @fact_spacts as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
19

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FactFlicks” (@fact_spacts), 80,598 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fact_spacts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.