🟠 Today marks the largest retail buying bias in IBIT we've seen in two years. Source: https://x.com/intangiblecoins/status/2090108589792797072 Orange infusion
👌6💋4👏3🤷2🤓1😇1

Channel
@bitcitrus5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
35,899subscribers
+651 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002643902698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @bitcitrus5 |
| Description | Inject your mind with fresh Bitcoin news 🍊 and dive into major moves and crypto innovations 🚀. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/bitcitrus5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:16 | 35,899 | +34 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 35,865 | -7 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 35,872 | +50 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 35,822 | +162 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 35,660 | +139 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 35,521 | +70 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 35,451 | +113 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 35,338 | +90 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:30 | 35,248 | first reading |
105 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 105 (5 August 2026 – 20 August 2026) |
| Views total | 895,990 |
| Reactions total | 3,926 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 04:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,926 reactions across 105 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 4.48% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 176 | 4.48% | |
| 🌭 | 170 | 4.33% | |
| 🍌 | 130 | 3.31% | |
| 🥰 | 130 | 3.31% | |
| 😇 | 124 | 3.16% | |
| 🎃 | 119 | 3.03% | |
| 🔥 | 119 | 3.03% | |
| 😍 | 119 | 3.03% | |
| 🏆 | 115 | 2.93% | |
| 💋 | 102 | 2.60% | |
| 🤷 | 102 | 2.60% | |
| 🤗 | 99 | 2.52% | |
| 🎄 | 97 | 2.47% | |
| 🍓 | 94 | 2.39% | |
| 🤓 | 94 | 2.39% | |
| 🦄 | 93 | 2.37% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 2.32% | |
| 🤣 | 91 | 2.32% | |
| 🤝 | 86 | 2.19% | |
| 😎 | 85 | 2.17% | |
| 34 further kinds | 1,690 | 43.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 105 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,926reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟠 Today marks the largest retail buying bias in IBIT we've seen in two years. Source: https://x.com/intangiblecoins/status/2090108589792797072 Orange infusion
👌6💋4👏3🤷2🤓1😇1
JAMES LAVISH: 🟠 "With all due respect, Bloomberg — no. Bitcoin is rallying because the Treasury has made it clear it’ll do whatever necessary to prevent long-term yields from skyrocketing." Source: https://x.com/jameslavish/status/2090109494827352184 Orange infusion
❤5🌭5🎃4👏3🍌2👌2🎉1🤝1
DATA: 🟠 Bitcoin surpasses $64K, reclaiming the 200-week moving average. Source: https://x.com/adam3us/status/2089651097220595937 Orange infusion
🥰4💋2⚡1🍓1🗿1🤬1🤷1
BULLISH: 🟠 Jan3, led by Samson Mow, forecasts Bitcoin hitting $1.2M by 2031 🚀 • Consistent with Stock-to-Flow and Power Law valuation models. • Fueled by the growing crisis of global fiat debt accumulation. Source: https://x.com/BitcoinArchive/status/2089859638489755778 Orange infusion
👌4🤗4😢3🏆2🖕2🤓2🎄1💯1
BULLISH: 🟠 BlackRock’s signaling the bottom is here — and you're still doubting Bitcoin? Source: https://x.com/TheBTCTherapist/status/2089913521853047194 Orange infusion
👌3🤝2🥰2😇2😈2🌚1😘1😨1
NEW: 🇺🇸 CalPERS, the largest public pension fund in the U.S., holds $35.5 million in Strategy shares. Source: https://x.com/BitcoinNewsCom/status/2090038064282227124 Orange infusion
👎6🎄4❤3🖕3🤗1😁1😇1
BULLISH: 🟠 Canaan Inc $CAN, a Singapore-listed #Bitcoin mining company, added 2 BTC to its reserves—bringing its total holdings to 1,917 BTC. Bitcoin 100 Ranking: 35 Source: https://x.com/BTCtreasuries/status/2089807347220656229 Orange infusion
🍌5🔥4😘3👍2😁2👻1
JUST IN: 🟠 $BTC surges past $68k as the US Treasury announces plans to double long-term debt buybacks. Source: https://x.com/BitcoinForCorps/status/2090100438808830459 Orange infusion
👏4🍾2🤝2🍌1👻1🤗1😢1😭1
JUST IN: 🟠 Fidelity Digital Assets notes that "BTC volatility is now lower than approximately 98.5% of all historical trading days." 👀 "It’s like a coiled spring — the longer volatility stays suppressed, the stronger the potential move when it finally releases." Source: https://x.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/2090054174511608026 Orange infusion
👍3🎄2😎2🙉2⚡1🍓1💯1
JUST IN: 🟠 Bitcoin treasury firm Strategy $MSTR now has a higher daily trading volume than Goldman Sachs, the investment banking giant. Strategy is outpacing the second-largest investment bank in trading activity. Source: https://x.com/BTCtreasuries/status/2090041863965454597 Orange infusion
🔥3👎1
🚨 THE SIGNAL. NOT THE NOISE. 🧠 Still chasing hype on Twitter? You’re already late. 💹 @blockpulsig — BlockSignal filters out the fluff and delivers: 📍 Real-time signals before they hit the herd 🐋 Whale wallet alerts & smart money moves 📊 TA & on-chain metrics, no BS ⚠️ Red flags. Green lights. Instant updates. 🕵️♂️ If you trade blind — you bleed. 🔐 If you follow signals — you win. 👁🗨 One channel. One edge. 👇 T…
🍓3🍌1🎃1🔥1🤩1😍1
🏦 Citigroup is gearing up to offer Bitcoin custody services for institutional clients later this year, leveraging its Custody+ platform. 📰 https://btctimes.com/citigroup-plans-bitcoin-custody-service-for-institutional-clients 📣 https://x.com/BTCTimescom/status/2090071170934595686 Orange infusion
🤣5😍2🍾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @bitcitrus5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 130,214 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orange infusion” (@bitcitrus5), 35,899 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitcitrus5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.