🚨 NEW: Kraken has launched 24/7 perpetual S&P 500 contracts on its funded trading platform—with commodities coming soon. Learn more PulseWire

Channel
PulseWire
@pulsewire3
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
38,542subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002633155467 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pulsewire3 |
| Description | 📶 Macro signals & tech waves in real time. Market shifts, system cracks, and the hidden patterns in between. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pulsewire3 |
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 20:49 | 38,542 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.6%
- avg views ÷ 38,542 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 7,940
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.406%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 158,851 |
| Reactions total | 644 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 20:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈6,510
- Videos
- ≈203
- Links
- ≈6,900
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 17s
- Average length
- 17s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
644 reactions across 19 posts, in 50 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.90% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🥰 | 38 | 5.90% | |
| ❤ | 30 | 4.66% | |
| ⚡ | 27 | 4.19% | |
| 🌭 | 26 | 4.04% | |
| 🤝 | 25 | 3.88% | |
| 🔥 | 23 | 3.57% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 3.26% | |
| 😍 | 21 | 3.26% | |
| 😎 | 21 | 3.26% | |
| 🍓 | 20 | 3.11% | |
| 👏 | 20 | 3.11% | |
| 💯 | 20 | 3.11% | |
| 🤗 | 20 | 3.11% | |
| 🤩 | 19 | 2.95% | |
| 👌 | 18 | 2.80% | |
| 🤓 | 16 | 2.48% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 2.48% | |
| 🦄 | 15 | 2.33% | |
| 🎄 | 14 | 2.17% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 2.02% | |
| 30 further kinds | 221 | 34.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 644reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🚨 INSIGHT: Elon Musk claims AI might make up 99% of SpaceX’s value in the next four to five years. AI-driven advancements could soon become the backbone of the company’s growth and innovation. PulseWire
🎄5🤝2
🇺🇸 BREAKING: The Intercept and the Freedom of the Press Foundation have filed a lawsuit against Trump over his plan to charge up to $100,000 per month for early access to Truth Social posts. The legal action challenges what critics call an unprecedented attempt to monetize presidential communications and restrict media access. #PressFreedom #TrumpLawsuit PulseWire
🙏10🎄2🤮2🎃1😍1
🚨 UPDATE: Harmony has identified 10,288 transactions linked to 409 wallets involved in fraudulent token minting. The team is actively assessing a possible rollback as part of the ongoing investigation into the unauthorized minting activity. PulseWire
✍10❤4⚡3👏3😨2🙈1
In June, Cointelegraph joined forces with Heiner García, Mauro Eldritch, and the ANYRUN app to investigate suspected North Korean IT workers—by luring them into a fake crypto startup set up by the research team. Our reporter went undercover as a venture capitalist, discussing potential funding and even dangled the possibility of Cointelegraph coverage. They had no idea who they were really pitching to. Read the fu…
⚡9😐6🌚4🐳4🎉2😍2🎃1👍1
🚨 LATEST: The OCC is pushing to revive new bank chartering, supporting firms focused on digital assets and emerging technologies, as it applauds the FDIC’s ongoing reform initiatives. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
❤3🎃3😘3🙊3🎉2🐳2👀2👻2
🇺🇸 LATEST: President Trump is considering possible reductions in capital gains taxes and easing regulations on home sales, Bloomberg reports. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
🤝7😍6⚡4🔥3😁3😨3🌭2🍌2
🇺🇸 BIG: The SEC is moving ahead with its own crypto regulations after last week’s collapse of the Clarity Act in Congress. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
🤔8🔥4🗿4🎄3🌭2🎉2👌1👏1
🇺🇸 BREAKING: The CFTC has officially charged Goliath Ventures and its CEO over allegations of orchestrating a $400 million fraud scheme. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
🤓8😭6🌭5👎5🔥5🥰5👀4👏4
🔥 UPDATE: CEO Phong Le has announced the company will resume Bitcoin purchases this year, restarting following a seven-week pause. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
👏9🤩9😇7🌭4🍓4🤝4🤣4😍4
🚨 BREAKING: U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright reveals that oil flows from the Arabian Gulf exceeded 20 million barrels on Sunday—surpassing pre-conflict averages. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
💯11❤8👍7😎6🎃3🎄3⚡2🤩2
🇷🇺 JUST IN: Russia’s central bank is proposing to allow Bitcoin, Ether, and USDT trading on regulated exchanges. News | Markets | YouTube PulseWire
🤗11😁8😡5😨5🌭4🏆3⚡2🖕2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pulsewire3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 326,965 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PulseWire” (@pulsewire3), 38,542 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pulsewire3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.