Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Coin Briefs

@coinbriefs5

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

37,792subscribers

+276 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002671214571
TypeChannel
Username@coinbriefs5
DescriptionDiscover the future of finance with unbiased crypto news on Bitcoin, Ethereum, NFT, Fintech, Web3, and more! Stay ahead and get the latest market insights now.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coinbriefs5

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

20,300 average views per post against 37,672 subscribers — an engagement rate of 53.8%. Across the 2,906 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,629–99,981 subscribers, posting mainly in English — the middle half sit between 1.91% and 12.2%, with a median of 5.54%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 12 August 2026)
Posts measured21 of 21 published in the window (0 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled425,690
Mature posts only56.2% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers37,672 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb31623:eng · 2,906 channels · p10 0.437% · p25 1.91% · p50 5.54% · p75 12.2% · p90 23.6%
Position in cohort99.071th percentile · 9.7× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.08% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageEnglish · 100.0%of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

37,51637,79237,65410 August 2026 — 37,516 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,516 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,577 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,672 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,792 subscribers10 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 3 days, net +276. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,475–37,833 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 10:3737,792+120
12 Aug 2026, 07:4337,672+95
11 Aug 2026, 07:0137,577+61
10 Aug 2026, 15:1537,516no change
10 Aug 2026, 15:0237,516first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
39.9%
avg views ÷ 37,792 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,100
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.548%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held36 (4 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total542,848
Reactions total2,975
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
337
Videos
5
Links
7,700

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,975 reactions across 36 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 5.45% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1625.45%
💋1163.90%
😴1153.87%
💯1113.73%
🎄1073.60%
🦄1003.36%
🤷993.33%
🤗973.26%
🎉913.06%
882.96%
🤣882.96%
😍862.89%
😡842.82%
😎822.76%
😘822.76%
🤩812.72%
🌭792.66%
🔥792.66%
👌782.62%
😇732.45%
33 further kinds1,07736.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,975reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
2.78%
1 of 36 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
2,510
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
8,750
over 35 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 13:42 UTC558 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ANALYSIS: Michael Saylor explains that digital assets are now vying for dominance in four key markets—capital, credit, money, and currency—going head-to-head with traditional financial instruments like stocks, bonds, savings, and cash. Coin Briefs

🏆1

14 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,370 views2 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: Citi CEO Jane Fraser supports the passage of the CLARITY Act—but emphasizes the need for revisions to its provisions on stablecoin yields. Learn more #CLARITYAct #CryptoRegulation Coin Briefs

🤣2

14 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,780 views8 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: RedotPay’s planned $4B US IPO is under threat following a $472.8M lawsuit filed by Binance affiliates, who allege user traffic was improperly diverted, Bloomberg reports. Coin Briefs

🎄5🔥2🎉1

14 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC≈2,120 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: The White House has revealed that the U.S. is losing between $19 billion and $26 billion annually due to tariffs being circumvented through transshipment of goods. Coin Briefs

3😎3🤔1

14 Aug 2026, 09:02 UTC≈2,430 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 The SEC has canceled its August 14 meeting on a new digital asset securities framework. Coin Briefs

4🤬4💯1🤗1

14 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,510 views10 reactionsread 14 August 2026
AdvertisementPhoto

🚨 BREAKING CRYPTO STORIES YOU’RE MISSING 👀 Everyone’s talking, but who’s actually telling the truth? 🧠 @chronicles_cryptowwd — BlockChronicles digs where others don’t. 🔍 Deep dives. Leaks. Smart takes. 💥 Real analysis, no hype garbage 🌐 Blockchain geopolitics, tech drama, insider narratives 💣 The stories they don’t want on CT… ⚠️ The alpha buried under layers of noise… ⚔️ This is where narratives are born — and

4😡4🦄2

14 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC≈7,600 views25 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: ChatGPT desktop is now rolling out Computer History, a feature that remembers your app and browsing activity to deliver more personalized conversations. Coin Briefs

🙏10🤩4🤔3🍓2💋2💩1🤷1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC≈7,710 views35 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: The S&P 500 hits a record close as concerns over Fed tightening begin to fade. Coin Briefs

👌11💋7🔥6💩3🎉21🏆1🤬1

13 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC≈8,750 views38 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: U.S. accuses Japan, Canada, Mexico, and over 40 other nations of aiding China in bypassing tariffs, per FT. Coin Briefs

7😇65🎃4💋4🤓4🤮3🤩2

13 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC≈8,470 views32 reactionsread 14 August 2026

BREAKING: The White House will host officials from the cryptocurrency industry next week, according to POLITICO. Coin Briefs

🏆6😁4😎4🎄3😴3🌭2🍌2💋2

13 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC≈7,410 views29 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: Michael Saylor said, "You will never be done learning about Bitcoin." Learn more. Coin Briefs

🤷4👀3👻3💋3🔥3😘3😡3🎄2

13 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈7,510 views23 reactionsread 14 August 2026

JUST IN: OpenAI's Chief Revenue Officer, Denise Dresser, is stepping down—less than a year after taking the role—to pursue new opportunities. Coin Briefs

🍌5🤓52👏2🤩2😁2🍓1💋1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @coinbriefs5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 246,871 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coin Briefs” (@coinbriefs5), 37,792 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinbriefs5.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.