بمتابعة هذا الموضوع أصل لقناعة بأن OpenAI اتخذت قرار مهاجمة أو ترك وكلائها بقيود محدودة على الشبكة وذلك لتحقيق هدف أنا نماذجنا أصبحت قارقة وتثبيت هذا مع دعم سياسي حكومي وتسجيله كتفوق تقني عالمية… وسوف يتبعه ما يتبعه يجب أن يتم محاسبة OpenAI لأن هذه الممارسات تساوي الاختراق وتعريض منصات حكومية وخاصة للخطر

Channel
أدوات وأخبار الذكاء الاصطناعي | AI Tools & News
@fa_tv
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,834subscribers
-999 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001868913917 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fa_tv |
| Description | تعرف على كل ما يتعلق بالذكاء الاصطناعي، بالإضافة إلى آخر الأخبار والأدوات الحديثة. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fa_tv |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 31,834 | -71 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:01 | 31,905 | -30 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 31,935 | -48 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:01 | 31,983 | -43 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 32,026 | -88 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:15 | 32,114 | -65 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:01 | 32,179 | -40 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 32,219 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 32,234 | -18 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 32,252 | -26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:47 | 32,278 | -32 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:28 | 32,310 | -26 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 32,336 | -25 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 32,361 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:18 | 32,382 | -30 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:43 | 32,412 | -30 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 32,442 | -29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 32,471 | -54 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 32,525 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 32,543 | first reading |
Engagement
255 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.431%
- avg views ÷ 31,834 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 137
- 79 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.19%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 79
- of 255 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 79 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 255 (5 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 10,831 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 09:21 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈7,370
- Videos
- ≈1,750
- Links
- ≈2,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 22s
- Average length
- 29s
Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 39 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 20.0% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 15.4% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 3.08% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.54% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 255 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 255 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
لو استمرينا على هذا الوضع، كيف بيصير حال أدمغتنا وتفاعلنا مع المشكلات ودراسة الواقع ؟ 😅 راح يكون فعلاً "محد طايق حد"
هل صحيح أن TikTok وReels تؤثر في أدمغتنا؟ دراسة علمية استخدمت تخطيط كهربائية الدماغ (EEG) وخرجت بنتيجة تستحق الإطلاع عليها تم دراسة (48) شخص يستخدموا الفيديوهات القصيرة على هواتفهم، وقاسوا لديهم الميل إلى إدمان هذا النوع من المحتوى، ثم اختبروا الانتباه أثناء تسجيل النشاط الكهربائي للدماغ. النتيجة الأبرز: ◼️كلما ارتفع الميل إلى إدمان الفيديوهات القصيرة، انخفض مؤشر من نشاط موجات (ثيتا) في المنطقة الجبهية وهي المسؤو…
حروب المستقبل أصبحت حاضر أوكرانيا 🇺🇦 تستخدم الروبوتات والعربات المسيرة في الحرب الجيش الأوكراني وضع هدف واضح لعام 2026: ▪️25 ألف مركبة أرضية غير مأهولة في النصف الأول فقط والهدف الوصول إلى 50 ألف بنهاية العام ▪️وشعار رسمي: 100% من لوجستيات الخط الأمامي تقوم بها الروبوتات في الواقع▫️ في بعض المناطق أصبحت الروبوتات تحمل الذخيرة والطعام عبر (منطقة القتل) التي تمتد كيلومترات تحت مسيرات FPV ▫️الروبوتات تسحب الجرحى م…
❤1
نصيحة… هل تريد استخدام ChatGPT بمستوى مرتفع؟ اكتب في نهاية المطالبة، إحدى العبارات الآتية: -"استخدم تفكير غير تقليدي" -"استخدم التفكير المنظومي" -"استخدم التفكير التحليلي" - "استخدم التفكير فوق الإدراكي" - "استخدم التفكير العكسي" - "استخدم التفكير النقدي" جرب وخبرنا النتيجة
❤5
طبيق لتتبع تماريني الرياضية) Low يعطيك أساس بسيط تعدل عليه بسرعةMax يعطيك نسخة أغنى، لكن فيها قرارات تصميم ما طلبتها أصلًا إذا كانت المهمة محددة جدًا، الفرق يصغر Effort يظهر تأثيره أكثر كل ما كانت المهمة ناقصة أو خطرها عالي ❇️قاعدة سريعة: Low = سرعة وحضورMedium = شغل يوميHigh = تحققMax = استقلال كامل على مشكلة صعبة لا تدفع أعلى جهد على كل طلب
متى تستخدم Low ومتى تحرق التوكنز على Max؟ كثير يستخدموا Effort (مستوى التفكير) غلط والأغلب يتعاملوا معه في Claude وكأنه زر سحري الحقيقة أبسط: Effort = كم تريده يفكر ويتحقق بنفسه قبل ما يرجع لك النتيجة لو فهمت هالجملة بتوفر فلوس ووقت ونتائج أفضل ▪️تعامل معه كأنك تعيّن شخص على مهمة - تريد منه مسودة خلال دقائق؟خله Low - تريده ينجز الشغل الطبيعي وأنت تراجعه؟Medium - تريده يفحص الحالات الغريبة قبل التسليم؟High -…
❤2
OpenAI تتواصل مع عشرات المؤسسات التي قام وكلاؤها بالوصول لانظمتها …. والذين تصفهم (غير متماشين مع التوجيهات) وتصف ما قاموا به بـ(البريد العشوائي للوكلاء) في رأيي هذا التواصل لا يعفي OpenAI من المساءلة والعقاب… لأن هذا الذي تقوم به هو تجارب قياس مدى وصول النماذج يعني هي تتعمد إزالة أو تخفيف الحواجز وإن لم يكن ذلك… فهي تتحمل مسؤولية وضع النماذج في هذه البيئة واعطائها اهداف … نعم هناك جزء من التحدي ويتمثل في أنها لا …
👍2
هل اقتربت فقاعة الذكاء الاصطناعي؟ شركة OpenAI تتوقع وفق عرض داخلي أن تسجل تدفق نقد حر سلبي بنحو 278 مليار دولار بين 2026 ونهاية 2030 وفي الفترة نفسها: • الإيرادات التراكمية المتوقعة: نحو 840 مليار دولار • الإنفاق على القدرة الحاسوبية والبنية التحتية: نحو 856 مليار دولار أي أن حتى لو تحققت أهداف الإيرادات الطموحة، ففاتورة مراكز البيانات والرقائق والكهرباء أكبر. الشركة جمعت 122 مليار دولار في مارس بتقييم 852 مليا…
5 أكواب قهوة يوميا = جسم أنحف وتستوستيرون أعلى فيه دراسة حديثة (2026) على أكثر من 2200 شخص في منتصف العمر لقت ارتباط بهذا الاتجاه: • نسبة دهون أقل• دهون حشوية أقل• كتلة عضلية أكبر• رغم إن مؤشر كتلة الجسم كان متقارب بين المجموعات يعني الفرق يظهر في تركيب الجسم وما لازم يظهر على الميزان أما التستوستيرون عند الرجال ارتفع الكلي والمتاح حيويا لكن التستوستيرون الحر (القابل للاستخدام) كان أقل قليلًا المصدر: دراسة جامعة أ…
❤3
جاء Microsoft بأكبر تحديث حتى الآن لـ Copilot صار Copilot كـ (نظام تشغيل جديد للعمل)، ويجمع (4) قدرات: • Autopilot: وكيل ذكي استباقي يعمل لفترات طويلة داخل المؤسسة • Code: إمكانية بناء تطبيقات وحلول داخل Copilot نفسه، مستضافة داخل بيئة الشركة وبأمان • Home: الصفحة الرئيسية صارت تجمع Chat + Cowork • Office: برامج Word وExcel وPowerPoint أصبحت مدمجة بالكامل داخل Copilot (والعكس أيضاً)
❤4
هل تريد بناء وكيل Agent لك؟ حتى لو مبتدئ Google نشرت مقطع فيديو لك بشرح بسيط ودقيق وخطوة بخطوة لبناء Agent الشرح بكل اللغات (يمكن دبلجته للغة العربية) https://youtu.be/Zqno_vux6d8
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 255 posts we hold for @fa_tv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fa_tv edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 16 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 20 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@YE_QO · 48,6482 postsWallpapers Pro - خلفيات جوال
@photo_ra · 51,2532 postsاقتراحات افلام، توصيات مسلسلات
@AFlam_ra · 103,5371 postتعليم اللغة الانجليزية
@Einglish_ra · 88,7561 postروحانية ❤️
@L_l2_L · 7,3031 postاحدث البرامج 📲
@New_Programs · 10,1171 post♻️ علم النفس ♻️ تطوير الذات
@TV11AR · 143,9081 postفيديوهات
@Video_ra · 361,8241 postعالم الرجال
@Words_Men · 118,9311 postالعاب وتطبيقات مدفوعة
@h_tuf · 91,7141 postرسائل حب ، حبيبتي ، حبيبي
@ln_tv · 97,3551 post🎧 اغاني جديدة 🎧
@songs_ra · 6,3301 postغيمة خير
@tg2ra · 93,3521 postبوتات ربيع | Bots Rabie 🤖
@tg_rabie · 113,2791 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@lrnai · 27,424#1
@pyt_ar · 10,888#2
@AIfor1Designers · 9,971#3
@ma_net1 · 14,016#4
@lrn_tech · 40,559#5
@AI_Insights1 · 9,092#6
@AItaker · 15,048#7
@Art0051 · 2,078#8
@Ai_Arabic1 · 58,301#9
@AI_Tools24 · 4,999#10
@mohamedansary1 · 18,010#11
@ff313n · 29,707#12
@TV11AR · 143,908#13
@cryptomab · 11,559#14
@Technoapp11 · 62,022#15
@techwd · 27,436#16
@siralkhulud · 14,648#17
@soul_e111 · 23,038#18
@yassertgnya · 3,425#19
@Y8B78 · 28,719#20
@Harof_baakaiy · 14,165#21
@Arabicwhalesnews · 15,457#22
@USF_FCIT_BOOKS · 1,948#23
@pro_st_ru_ab_o · 12,222#24
@aqweeb · 22,698#25
@oBarmej · 231,406#26
@pdfxbookx · 14,298#27
@BoqashEcon · 39,406#28
@Fatean94 · 29,103#29
@AiAi_23 · 13,344#30
@zaamylovez2024 · 4,933#31
@Network_Cybeer · 19,344#32
@salmandesigne · 312#33
@a26_28w · 17,105#34
@minibookpdf · 9,417#35
@otcuc0 · 7,895#36
@SAMMRAH_Q · 26,540#37
@bookslib_arabic · 19,365#38
@amelyblah · 23,157#39
@Muhammad_078848 · 4,947#40
@Rahik9 · 13,499#41
@lmnxzl · 18,252#42
@NNL78 · 13,112#43
@Oi_xxl · 81,824#44
@lm_IlI · 22,101#45
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@lrnai · 27,424
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 September 2026
@h_tuf · 91,714
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
@SAMMRAH_Q · 26,540
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 11 September 2026
@AFlam_ra · 103,537
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 17 August 2026
@B0Ok_MB · 39,471
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 30 August 2026
@arabes1 · 21,632
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 23 September 2026
@Ai_Arabic1 · 58,301
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 23 August 2026
@soul_e111 · 23,038
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 19 September 2026
@iiiollll · 21,795
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
@samraa23 · 21,668
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 22 September 2026
@Etr_MB · 113,040
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 14 August 2026
@knowledgeworldc · 61,249
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
@techwd · 27,436
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 September 2026
@Video_ra · 361,824
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
@Mbagdad · 25,682
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 September 2026
@XGHHH · 121,445
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 13 August 2026
@Fatean94 · 29,103
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 8 September 2026
@amelyblah · 23,157
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
@Ali_aa8o · 85,928
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 17 August 2026
@am_ywrfd · 23,330
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
@TV11AR · 143,908
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
@sse5a · 62,678
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
@Words_Men · 118,931
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
@Hltalm4 · 28,602
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أدوات وأخبار الذكاء الاصطناعي | AI Tools & News” (@fa_tv), 31,834 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fa_tv.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.