8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,926–11,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 23:58
11,933
-7
12 Aug 2026, 02:32
11,940
-5
11 Aug 2026, 04:08
11,945
-7
10 Aug 2026, 06:53
11,952
-8
9 Aug 2026, 05:02
11,960
-12
8 Aug 2026, 03:01
11,972
-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:45
11,981
no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:33
11,981
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.33%
avg views ÷ 11,933 subscribers
Avg views / post
279
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held
20 (24 May 2026 – 3 August 2026)
Views total
1,393
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 03:48 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,150
Videos
≈98
Links
≈2,430
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
68 reactions across 18 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
60
88.2%
🔥
7
10.3%
🤯
1
1.47%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 عرض استثنائي لفترة محدودة! 🔥
احصل على اشتراك Gemini Pro لمدة سنة ونصف مقابل 5 دولار أمريكي فقط
✨ يشمل الاشتراك:
🤖 5 تيرابايت مساحة تخزين على Google.
🧠 أحدث نماذج Gemini المتقدمة.
🎬 Veo 3.1 لإنشاء الفيديوهات بالذكاء الاصطناعي.
🎨 توليد الصور والمحتوى باحترافية.
📚 NotebookLM.
📧 دمج Gemini مع Gmail وGoogle Docs.
⚡️ تفعيل سريع وآمن على بريدك الشخصي.
🛡️ دعم فني وضمان على الخدمة.
للشراء تواصل معايا الكميه قبل ما تنته
🔴 مؤسس بينانس CZ يحذر من عودة الفترات الصعبة في سوق العملات الرقمية 📉⚠️.
🔴 أشار إلى أن إيقاف منصة BitMart لعملياتها يبدو منظمًا، مع إتاحة الفرصة للمستخدمين لسحب أصولهم 💰🏦.
🔴 ودعا المستخدمين إلى إعطاء الأولوية لحماية أصولهم الرقمية وعدم الاعتماد الكامل على المنصات 🛡️🚫🏛️.
🔥 قنبلة الربح المجاني وصلت!
اسحب أرباحك من أول يوم! 💣🛫
يا شباب، جبتلكم النهاردة كنز حرفياً! 😍 بوت مجاني 100% وفكرته عبقرية ومسلسة جداً! 🎮
✨ ليه البوت ده فرصة متتعوضش؟
⛔️ بدون إيداع : مش هتدفع ولا مليم.
🚫 بدون إحالات : السحب مفتوح للجميع !
🚀 سحب فوري: د ي أقوى ميزة.. تقدر تسحب أرباحك من أول يوم شغل! تخيل؟ 🤯
👉 طريقة الشغل في ثواني:
1️⃣ سجل في البوت.
2️⃣ اعمل كام مهمة بسيطة.
3️⃣ اشتري عصافير 🐦⬛️ .
4️⃣ حول البيض 💪…
🩵 أصبح تطبيق تيليجرام الآن يتمتع بمحرر نصوص متقدم.
يدعم هذا المحرر الجداول، والعناوين، ووسائط مضمنة، والقوائم، والمحتوى الذي يتم إنشاؤه بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي، والصيغ، والمزيد.
😈 تطبيقات المراسلة لن تكون كما كانت من قبل!
حدث محفظة TON ايداع 100$ تداول 50$
احتمالية ربح اضافيه 50$ او تجميع نقاط تفتح منها صناديق النقاط بتحصل عليها من خلال الايداع والتداول
https://t.me/wallet/start?startapp=ref-3-Y9SEHAK5tvg
دوروف :
⚠️ شركة الاتصالات الهندية Reliance تقوم بتخريب الوصول إلى Telegram لملايين المستخدمين خارج الهند (بما في ذلك الإمارات العربية المتحدة) عبر طريقة مارقة تُعرف باسم اختطاف BGP.
🧨 يبدو أن هذا التخريب متعمد، إذ تجاهلت Reliance العديد من البلاغات والتقارير.
😞 قد يكون هذا جزءًا من حرب تنافسية، إذ إن Reliance مملوكة جزئيًا لشركة Meta، الشركة المالكة لـ WhatsApp.
🌐 يُنصح مشغلو الشبكات برفض إعلانات BGP غير المصرح به…
مشروع soso value 💎
رسميا انتهاء الموسم الثاني من 💎الايردروب
معرفة تخصيص العملات 12/6 💎القادم
الآن بدأ الموسم الثالث متاح ⬇️⬇️للجدد
https://sosovalue.com/join/548X56RA
548X56RA كود التسجيل
استغلو الفرصة الموسم الاول كل لي اشغتل بشكل جيد حقق اقل شيء 200$ و انا حققت و لله الحمد . اكي من 700$
الموسم ثاني قريب نشوف كم حققنا . استغلو الموسم ثالث
🚨 تطور مهم في مجتمع TON 🤑
صوّت المجتمع بالموافقة على إعادة تسمية العملة من $TON إلى $GRAM بنسبة تأييد 80٪ 💎
❓ ما الذي سيتغير إذا ❓
🔹 الاسم والرمز فقط
🔹 أرصدتك ستبقى كما هي
🔹 لا يوجد Swap أو Migration
🔹 لا حاجة لأي إجراء من المستخدم
❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cryptomab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 513,343 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
تعلم البرمجة @oBarmej · 237,190 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 11 August 2026
Raul Aymen - راؤول ايمن @raulaymen · 244,618 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 11 August 2026
Marketing @digitalmarketing34 · 164,464 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 12 August 2026
Free Courses & Books 📚 @Coursat2020 · 518,325 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 10 August 2026
EduMeFree @edumefree2022 · 359,409 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cryptomab 💲🐋” (@cryptomab), 11,933 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cryptomab.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.