Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for amours mi

Channel

amours mi

@amoursmi

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

31,830subscribers

+323 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001378465089
TypeChannel
Username@amoursmi
Descriptionсвязь: @iamowrm 🧚🏽‍♀️ реклама: https://t.me/rekamoursmi/3
Created20 November 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/amoursmi

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

31,44631,87431,66031,8307 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net +323. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31,382–31,938 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 03:1931,830-17
10 Nov 2026, 06:0131,847+13
8 Nov 2026, 16:2131,834+25
7 Nov 2026, 08:3731,809-14
6 Nov 2026, 08:3131,823-27
5 Nov 2026, 06:0831,850-15
4 Nov 2026, 03:3731,865+10
3 Nov 2026, 02:1031,855+13
2 Nov 2026, 03:3931,842-10
1 Nov 2026, 00:2631,852-11
31 Oct 2026, 03:2431,863-11
30 Oct 2026, 05:4831,874+7
29 Oct 2026, 07:3131,867+9
28 Oct 2026, 07:2531,858-9
27 Oct 2026, 09:5631,867+17
26 Oct 2026, 12:3531,850+36
25 Oct 2026, 13:2131,814+87
24 Oct 2026, 12:5731,727+4
23 Oct 2026, 09:5231,723-16
22 Oct 2026, 11:0631,739first reading

Engagement

291 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 198 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.4%
avg views ÷ 31,830 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,170
92 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
92
of 291 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held291 (2 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total567,780
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 04:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,800
Videos
≈107
Links
≈39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 35s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 92 posts held from the last 30 days (5.43%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 20:30 UTC≈3,700 viewsread 12 November 2026

холодные мужчины не для меня! меня нужно носить на руках, терпеть капризы, задаривать вниманием, дарить цветы с записками, встречать в аэропорту, разговаривать часами о разном, запоминать все что я люблю, оплачивать мои хотелки, восхищаться и поддерживать каждую секунду!!!

10 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC≈4,540 viewsread 12 November 2026

мне очень мешает в жизни то, что у меня привычки и интересы более богатого человека, чем я есть

Showing the 12 most recent of 291 posts we hold for @amoursmi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 67 posts on @amoursmi as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
40 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
25

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Oct 2026, 18:56 UTCAnonymous Poll549 voters

ПП

  1. Правильное питание28%
  2. Пойдем покушаем72%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Mon ami
@mon1amii · 75,809
#1
with love
@withllove13 · 31,052
#2
only eysś
@onIyeyss · 40,650
#3
333 new love
@newlovechanell · 49,029
#4
aurum.
@aaurumm · 10,300
#5
𝐬𝐢𝐤𝐯𝐚𝐫𝐮𝐥𝐢.1
@siikvarulii1 · 11,309
#6
mia more
@withloveelii · 17,776
#7
эмоциональные всплески
@vsplessski · 48,809
#8
loveeeeeee.story
@loveeesttory · 18,325
#9
amore,amore,amore
@ruh_parcassi · 85,799
#10
lllsss
@llggg08 · 4,108
#11
luv
@yaan_luuv · 39,703
#12
M
@mno_mno1 · 25,105
#13
need me.
@needdmme · 10,190
#14
The
@ismoilovTHE · 30,588
#15
evkasup
@evkasup13 · 101,863
#16
I miss you
@imiisssyou · 13,791
#17
u love
@thepersona · 1,874
#18
muah muah (Yana)
@muah1muah · 1,196
#19
𝐚𝐥𝐥𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐪
@waxidym · 12,857
#20
m’ mood
@parfyumb · 3,455
#21
maybé
@fainasha · 2,872
#22
milove
@mi_love77 · 1,222 (as read 6 September 2026)
#23
𝐕
@smilemyllove · 6,528
#24
mur
@murr11m · 764
#25
un artiste
@unartistte · 12,135
#26
𝒜𝓡𝐼
@malyyass · 1,179
#27
mi amore
@miammorree · 1,048
#28
vinchérie
@cvoenravka · 25,701
#29
kkermond
@kkermond · 24,006
#30
Кусочек счастья 🤍
@happiness00_0 · 120,981
#31
itsfarzona’s
@itsfarzonas · 4,361
#32
s lyubovyu, n
@sllyubovyun · 1,037
#33
laviliya
@laviliya · 19,701
#34
арабские цитаты
@iloveeyoustill · 77,065
#35
sh
@k77kk7kk77 · 5,669
#36
𝐍.❤️‍🩹
@dushaa_n · 4,629
#37
vseotebe
@vseotebe99 · 37,139
#38
see you
@see9you · 12,082
#39
лейли нурани
@leylinurani · 44,356
#40
𝐠𝐮𝐫𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐨𝐯𝐧𝐚𝐚
@hogisaa · 8,353
#41
Wxlls
@wxlls500 · 12,173
#42
terriizw | Мой Блог♥️
@tterriizw · 3,711
#43
Mojvod
@mojvodd · 12,174
#44
Գ.
@srtovvv_g · 8,254
#45
l o v e
@etoam · 23,483
#46
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 631,287
#47
yus
@yusouul · 3,976
#48
365 new days
@evodays · 377,546
#49
Untouchable
@otebem1 · 5,450
#50
hmuro
@vurhalm3 · 27,213
#51
00:40
@murmiumua · 4,175
#52
MS
@moyeserdce22 · 26,280
#53
♦️ Diamonds ♦️
@wyuww · 224
#54
sí
@siwithu · 2,876
#55
The Izbas
@TheIzbas · 19,771
#56

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

with love
@withllove13 · 31,052
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 6 September 2026
333 new love
@newlovechanell · 49,029
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 August 2026
U
@slyubovyu_mayaa · 20,740
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 22 September 2026
M
@mno_mno1 · 25,105
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 14 September 2026
only eysś
@onIyeyss · 40,650
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 30 August 2026
EVET🫀
@evetvgg · 21,657
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 September 2026
elisoullove
@elisoullove · 29,063
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 7 September 2026
эмоциональные всплески
@vsplessski · 48,809
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 25 August 2026
your affection
@youuraffection · 24,825
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 13 September 2026
foréver
@foreverimore · 23,145
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 September 2026
The
@ismoilovTHE · 30,588
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐬𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐬💌
@storiesinstaa · 23,433
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 16 September 2026
vinchérie
@cvoenravka · 25,701
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 12 September 2026
The end
@tthenddd · 21,016
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 22 September 2026
𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡 𝐥𝐨𝐯𝐞
@yourIoveforme · 25,715
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 11 September 2026
amore,amore,amore
@ruh_parcassi · 85,799
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 18 August 2026
laviliya
@laviliya · 19,701
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 4 October 2026
by lowwwasw 🩰
@lowwwasw · 28,940
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 7 September 2026
l o v e
@etoam · 23,483
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 31 here — alongside 30 others — read 19 September 2026
Nelifer Nelifer ⚡️💗
@nelifernelifer · 26,070
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 16 September 2026
L🤍
@lizallllllllllllllllllll1 · 23,126
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 16 September 2026
Стикерач
@stikery_emodzi_memy · 1,153,276
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 8 August 2026
my ruh
@tsitaty_arabskie_islamskie · 36,080
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
𝐏𝐬𝐢𝐡𝐨𝐩𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐲𝐚️
@june_29 · 27,890
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“amours mi” (@amoursmi), 31,830 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/amoursmi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.