Channel
@etacenter
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
26subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001903932161 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @etacenter |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 December 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/etacenter |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @etacenter/33 · this entry26 Oct 2024, 17:13 UTC | @abortioneffects/22926 Oct 2024, 17:16 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @etacenter/36 · this entry3 Apr 2025, 12:31 UTC | @abortioneffects/2313 Apr 2025, 12:42 UTC | 1.00 | 11 minutes |
| @etacenter/37 · this entry3 Jun 2025, 11:17 UTC | @abortioneffects/2323 Jun 2025, 11:18 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @abortioneffects | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 4 minutes | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14 comparable posts for this entry, running 2 July 2024 to 9 January 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @etacenter — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:04 | 26 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 27 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 28 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 28 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
30 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 12 | 40.0% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 33.3% | |
| 🕊 | 6 | 20.0% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 6.67% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2024 to 9 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🤰 Лекция «Человек — начало жизни»: важный образовательный ресурс для работы с молодёжью Приглашаем педагогов, психологов, родителей и специалистов, работающих с молодёжью, ознакомиться с обучающей лекцией «Человек — начало жизни». 📖 О чём лекция? Материал даёт системное представление о развитии человека до рождения. Информация изложена в доступной форме и адаптирована для проведения занятий со школьниками и подрост…
👍3🕊1
❗️Когда началась твоя жизнь? ✅ На этот вопрос наука давно уже нашла единственно верный и точный ответ! ❤️ Жизнь каждого человека начинается не с первого крика и даже не с рождения, а гораздо раньше! 💡 Ответ, который даёт такая наука, как Эмбриология, куда удивительнее! 💯 В анимационном проекте «Научные факты - начало жизни» профессор МГУ раскрывает фундаментальный научный факт момента начала новой жизни человека!…
🕊1
❇️ *«Начало жизни человека»* 🤰 Приглашаем на обучающую *лекцию 20.12.2025 г. в субботу в 13.00* (Московское время) Лектор: ФЕДИШИН Дмитрий Николаевич, АНО «Центр реализации социальных инициатив и проектов «ЭТА» ◀️Вы отправитесь в удивительное путешествие - к самому началу Вашей собственной уникальной истории. Узнаете, как всего из двух микроскопических клеток появились именно ВЫ — уникальный и неповторимый человек. Р…
🕊1
❗️Дорогие соратники 📲 По просьбам мы доработали и выпустили также и горизонтальную версию анимационного проекта: "Научные факты - начало жизни". Данную версию, можно также использовать для соц. сетей и показа на ТВ. ⚡️ Вскоре опубликуем пост с анимационным проектом в горизонтальном виде и ссылкой, где можно будет скачать оригинал.
👍1
▶️ Софья Астраханцева, звездный корреспондент центральной службы новостей, получает от главного редактора не просто задание, а вызов. Ей поручено найти научный ответ на один из самых важных вопросов современности — когда начинается жизнь человека? Редактор хочет сенсации, но Софья, выпускница МГУ, понимает – за сухими формулировками скрывается величайшая тайна бытия! Внутри Софьи разгорается конфликт между журналис…
❤3🕊3👏2
⚡️Как работает законопроект о защите женщин от склонения к аборту? Меня принуждают сделать аборт. Это вообще законно? — НЕТ! Каждая женщина имеет право на материнство, и теперь это право защищено законом. Уже 25 регионов поддержали законодательную инициативу по защите женщин от склонения к аборту. Это означает, что те, кто принуждают женщину к прерыванию беременности, будут привлекаться к ответственности. 📎 Расск…
Чем является с биологической точки зрения процедура аборта? НАУЧНАЯ ИНФОРМАЦИЯ Человек — это биологический вид, характеризующийся высокой степенью развития мозга, способностью к абстрактному мышлению, языку и созданию культуры. 🧬 Единственная наука, определяющая критерии начала и завершения жизни биологического организма — это Биология. Начало жизни С научной точки зрения, началом человеческой жизни считается зач…
Мэтр Российской науки, один из самых заслуженных и любимый многими поколениями биологов, профессор кафедры эмбриологии Голиченков Владимир Александрович, делится своими знаниями о зарождении жизни. Эти уникальные кадры, снятые в МГУ на лекции профессора в 2019 году, позволяют зрителям глубже понять, как начинается жизнь человека. Научные исследования показывают, что зарождение человека происходит с момента зачатия, …
👍4❤2
❇️ Проект «ОЛИВИЯ» — просветительский проект, направленный на защиту семейных ценностей, материнства, повышение знаний о беременности и начале жизни человека. Проект создан для распространения социально-просветительской информации. ✅ Проект «ОЛИВИЯ» уже успешно реализован в 5-и Российских регионах: Белгородская область, Республика Татарстан, Вологодская область, Удмуртия, Томская область посредством установки в женс…
Человеческая жизнь начинается с момента оплодотворения – это однозначный ответ науки эмбриологии. Научную информацию о начале жизни и внутриутробном развитии человека дает Молчанов Александр Юрьевич, научный сотрудник кафедры эмбриологии биологического факультета МГУ им. М.В. Ломоносова. Александр Юрьевич ответил на такие важные вопросы как: 1) Когда с научной точки зрения начинается жизнь человека? 2) Как ребенок …
❤4
Как важно своевременно рассказывать молодежи важные знания о зарождении жизни, о том какие последствия могут нести ранние половые отношения. Объяснять молодежи, что аборт – это убийство ребенка, вне зависимости от способа его проведения. Общественный деятель, блогер Алёна Столичная, пообщалась со студентами об абортах. Это наглядный пример, как необходимо молодежи рассказывать правду на «востребованные» в обществе т…
Мы, жители Пушкинского городского округа обратились к депутату Государственной Думы Пахомову Сергею Александровичу с наказом поддержать законопроекты, направленные, на защиту жизни детей с момента зачатия. Дети – это будущее России, семья – это основа государства! Пока наши ребята умирают на фронте мы должны предпринять все усилия для прекращения детоубийств тут в тылу! С абортами, а их прямо можно называть детоубийс…
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @etacenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@etacenter named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Центр социальных инициатив и проектов ЭТА” (@etacenter), 26 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etacenter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.