Channel
@wizards28
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001115672353 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wizards28 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2017 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 5 times, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wizards28 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 42 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 43 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:30 | 41 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 41 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
26 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 15 | 57.7% | |
| custom 5472025408708819380 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 7.69% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 3.85% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Автор Guardian предлагает хорошее понятие: decadence without pleasure - декаданс без удовольствия https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/jul/26/age-of-decadence-pleasure-ai От старого декаданса XIX века нам достались его поверхности: искусственность, эстетизация себя, избыточность, культ тела, экзотика. Но исчезла его центральная идея - удовольствие как самоцель. Сегодня желание всё чаще существуе…
👍2
via a sub
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quyaaszg6jc
Photo, posted without a caption
🫡2custom 54720254087088193801
Теперь понятно, почему после истории с детьми Павла Дурова того сначала одно правительство в тюрьму посадило, а потом другое объявило экстремистом. В Вархаммере все беды тоже начинались с одного одарённого космополита — когда тот решил отыскать своих генетических отпрысков на дальних рубежах галактики. Чуют, к чему всё идёт.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-companies-destroying-rare-books
feargreedmeter.com
Photo, posted without a caption
😁1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7fqUz8Mpcik
😢1
Photo, posted without a caption
😁2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @wizards28. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Wizards 28” (@wizards28), 42 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wizards28.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.