3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 806–807 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 11:55
806
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:34
807
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:53
807
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
37.2%
avg views ÷ 806 subscribers
Avg views / post
300
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held
16 (10 June 2026 – 2 August 2026)
Views total
899
Reactions total
39
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 01:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
49s
Average length
16s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
196 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
58
29.6%
👍
57
29.1%
🤣
24
12.2%
🤬
13
6.63%
🙏
12
6.12%
😭
7
3.57%
🎉
6
3.06%
👎
6
3.06%
🕊
5
2.55%
👏
3
1.53%
💔
2
1.02%
😱
2
1.02%
custom 5391112412445288650
1
0.51%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 196reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
☀️Утро начинается не с кофе. Оно начинается с гудка электрички! С Днем железнодорожника!
Дорогие друзья, коллеги-железнодорожники!
Поздравляем с вашим профессиональным праздником! Для многих из нас железная дорога стала настоящей судьбой и делом всей жизни, которым по праву гордится страна.
Спасибо за вашу самоотдачу, уникальные знания и то чувство ответственности, благодаря которому наши стальные артерии работают б…
🦅 В «Сапсане» протестировали робота-проводника «Володю»
На тестовой поездке «Володя» встречал пассажиров, проверял документы и билеты, а также помогал найти своë место.
🤩Ленинградское направление | Предложить свою новость
🚆 ЭС104-011+008 "Финист" выпустили на обычные рейсы Ленинградское направления
На данный момент едут рейсом 6611 Конаково — Москва, а позже поедут поездом 6612 Москва — Конаково, отправлением в 17:12 с Ленинградской вокзала
📷 ГСУЭМ
🤩Ленинградское направление | Предложить свою новость
🇨🇿 ЧС200-004 скоро вернется домой
Чешский электровоз был замечен на станции «Александров» в направление к депо ТЧЭ-8 «Санкт-Петербург-Пассажирский-Московский».
📷 Semen Skripachevskiy
🤩 Ленинградское направление | Предложить свою новость
🏭🏭На заводе «Уральские локомотивы» показали обтекаемый корпус высокоскоростного поезда для ВСМ-1
Специалисты установили на ЭВС360-001 аэродинамические головные и носовые обтекатели, что позволило им проверить их геометрию и точность стыковки с кузовом.
В 2027 планируется предоставить первые образцы «Поезда для ВСМ» для испытаний, а введение в эксплуатацию запланировано на 2027 год.
🤩 Ленинградское направление | Пр…
🔴 Как и сообщалось нами ранее, «Ласточки» начинают заменять старыми электричками ЭТ2М
Вчера один из наших подписчиков заметил на линии ни разу не эксплуатирующийся В Москве ЭТ2М-073 . Также на направление 5-ти вагонные «Ласточки» уже начали перевозить пассажиров.
Сроки изменений подвижного состава - неизвестны, но пока что стоит ожидать поставку новых ЭТ2М в Москву, а также больше пяти вагонных электропоездов серии…
🐦⬛️ У некоторых маршрутов «Ласточек» были сокращены вагоны с десяти до пяти
Причиной этому стала нехватка мощностей в депо «Крюково». На замену «Ласточек» может выйти старый подвижной состав ЭТ2М.
🤩 Ленинградское направление | Предложить свою новость
🚉 Петровско-Разумовская закрывается с 15 июля
Делается это с целью прокладки путей для ВСМ-1. Платформы будут снесены, а новые построят около метро и МЦД-1. Открытие планируется в 2028 году.
🤩 Ленинградское направление | Предложить свою новость
За окном жаркая погода и мы раздаем воду.
☀️ Сегодня днём температура воздуха поднялась выше +28 градусов.
❗️В такие дни лучше по возможности оставаться дома людям старшего возраста, беременным женщинам и детям.
А если все же решили отправиться в поездку, то мы поможем справиться с жарой, и в самые жаркие часы дня предложим пассажирам питьевую воду в пригородных кассах станции:
➡️ на Ленинградском вокзале
➡️ Зелено…
Видео было снято после отправки электрички на Москву с Твери. это станция Петровско-Разумовская, группа зацеперов решили зацепиться за электричку в сторону Клина
- Сообщает подписчик
❗️ Зацепинг может привести к травмам и даже к летальному исходу! Не занимайтесь этим!
🤩 Ленинградское направление | Предложить свою новость
😁 Недолго песенка играла…
Ⓜ️ Подписаться на ПММЦД | MAX | ВК | Наши каналы
🤣11🎉4😭3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @lenka_OZD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@lenka_OZD named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sluhmetro named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ленинградское направление | «Москва» - «Бологое»” (@lenka_OZD), 806 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lenka_OZD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
