Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✨Beads_Elea✨

Channel

✨Beads_Elea✨

@eleabiser

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

201subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002074181452
TypeChannel
Username@eleabiser
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/eleabiser

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@eleabiser/1781 · this entry1 Dec 2025, 16:50 UTC@aneli_beadss/14811 Dec 2025, 16:54 UTC1.004 minutes
@eleabiser/1794 · this entry24 Dec 2025, 18:02 UTC@aneli_beadss/148224 Dec 2025, 18:04 UTC1.0072 seconds
@eleabiser/1802 · this entry6 Jan 2026, 20:43 UTC@aneli_beadss/14846 Jan 2026, 20:48 UTC1.005 minutes
@eleabiser/1812 · this entry10 Feb 2026, 19:02 UTC@aneli_beadss/148510 Feb 2026, 19:02 UTC1.00under a minute
@eleabiser/1820 · this entry2 Jun 2026, 11:45 UTC@aneli_beadss/14862 Jun 2026, 11:46 UTC1.0072 seconds
@eleabiser/1827 · this entry15 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC@aneli_beadss/148715 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC1.002 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@aneli_beadss6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 13 comparable posts for this entry, running 11 November 2025 to 15 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @eleabiser — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

201214207.57 August 2026 — 213 subscribers7 August 2026 — 213 subscribers22 August 2026 — 214 subscribers29 August 2026 — 213 subscribers5 September 2026 — 211 subscribers13 September 2026 — 210 subscribers7 October 2026 — 209 subscribers15 October 2026 — 207 subscribers21 October 2026 — 208 subscribers29 October 2026 — 206 subscribers12 November 2026 — 201 subscribers7 August 202612 November 2026
11 measurements spanning 97 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 199–216 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 06:49201-5
29 Oct 2026, 11:30206-2
21 Oct 2026, 14:01208+1
15 Oct 2026, 05:27207-2
7 Oct 2026, 05:55209-1
13 Sept 2026, 05:19210-1
5 Sept 2026, 20:56211-2
29 Aug 2026, 18:42213-1
22 Aug 2026, 14:23214+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:36213no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:47213first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 11 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

186 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7238.7%
🔥2915.6%
💘2312.4%
🥰189.68%
🍓136.99%
🎉105.38%
😍94.84%
🤯63.23%
🐳21.08%
🥴21.08%
☃10.538%
😢10.538%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 November 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @eleabiser. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 November 2025 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC118 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет! Сегодня показываю вам милейшую мышку на ягодках). Сплела довольно быстро и результат довольно порадовал, в начале плетения мне казалось, что из-за расцветки она похожа на опоссума,но все обошлось (⁠◠⁠‿⁠◕⁠) Схема понятная и качественная, на канале автора можно найти всю информацию по поводу нее. Канал автора: @beadsVerymi Как проходит ваше лето?

❤9🔥3🍓1💘1

2 Jun 2026, 11:45 UTC262 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Поздравляю всех с началом летних каникул! Надеюсь, что все начали это лето с хорошими эмоциями, а тем у кого экзамены попались самые лёгкие варианты! Это лето начинаю с прекрасной жабки на тест от Маши. К сожалению из-за учебы совсем не плела, но летом постараюсь плести больше. Жаба получилась забавной и милой. Очень нравится результат. Схема качественная и красивая, информацию можно узнать на …

❤13💘1🔥1😍1

16 Mar 2026, 18:52 UTC369 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Сегодня показываю вам очаровательного оленёнка на тест. Сплела довольно таки давно и как показалось быстро. Результат не может не радовать, вышло очень мило и достаточно атмосферно). Снова взяла алебастровый бисер, слишком уж мне нравится как он выглядит в работах) Схема качественная и проверена на ошибки, о ее судьбе к сожалению не помню, лучше посмотреть на канале автора. Канал автора: @sunnykitt…

❤12💘1

10 Feb 2026, 19:02 UTC359 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Показываю вам своего достаточно давно сплетенного снеговичка на тест. Результат мне очень нравятся, получилось похоже на мармеладку)). А сама расцветка мне немного напоминают мандаринки. Этот снеговик прям передаёт новогоднюю атмосферу ^•^ Схема очень красивая и качественная, так что всем советую, схема насколько я помню—платная, но лучше посмотреть на канале автора. Канал автора: @ldkdkdljjj Как…

❤10💘5🐳1

21 Jan 2026, 18:22 UTC380 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В честь этого делаю скидку на схему Бетти и макаки. Бетти можно приобрести за 40 рус. р. Макаку за 175 рус. р. Скидки продлятся до 23.01 включительно)

🔥4❤2

21 Jan 2026, 18:19 UTC307 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Всем приветик! Сегодня этому каналу исполнилось два года! К сожалению, с каждым годом у меня всё меньше времени на плетение из-за школы, поэтому не успела подготовить никакую авторку в честь такого события (. Но! Несмотря на это у меня всё же есть пара почти готовых авторок и надеюсь, что в ближайшее время я смогу вам их показать. Спасибо большое всем, кто наблюдает за этим каналом и поддерживает моё творчество! Над…

🎉10❤4🔥1

7 Jan 2026, 19:39 UTC348 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Мой Кирби был парный с @Valeri_767676. У меня всё никак не доходили руки выложить пост, но всё же меня запинали до такой степени, что всё же я выложила пост) Ее канал: @kaya_beads_milkathanks Как вам наши Кирбики?

🍓8💘2🔥2❤1

6 Jan 2026, 20:43 UTC289 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Показываю вам своего очаровательного Кирби, сплетенного на тест. Сплела ещё осенью и на своё удивление очень быстро. Результат мне безумно нравится, выглядит как мармеладка) Схема очень классная, насколько я помню она в продаже, лучше посмотреть на канале автора. Канал автора: @beadmania07 На это всё, как вам мой Кирби?

❤12

4 Jan 2026, 06:45 UTC286 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Хоть и поздновато, но всё же делюсь с вами своими итогами 2025 года. Этот год был насыщенным, происходило много чего интересного, разные авторы бк проявляли себя и я в том числе). В 2025 году я сплела две авторки и они мне очень нравятся, да всё ещё есть недочёты, но если бы их не было я бы не смогла сделать вывод о том, как лучше сделать, а как хуже. Сейчас у меня в процессе две авторки и они почти …

🔥11

24 Dec 2025, 18:02 UTC365 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Показываю вам свою недавно сплетенную фигурку—новогодний-мишка-пряник. Сплела достаточно быстро и безумноо довольна результатом. Как по мне от этого мишки так веет новогодним вайбом, а мне как раз таки это не помешает). Насчет схемы точно не знаю, так что лучше найти информацию на канале автора. Канал автора: @mooshi_room Как вам мой мишка?

😍6❤3🐳1💘1🔥1🥰1

1 Dec 2025, 16:50 UTC510 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем приветик! Прошу прощения за пропажу, сейчас очень много дел в школе и не только(. Показываю вам фигурку, сплетённую относительно давно - очаровательный Томатик. Плела его на тест ещё в сентябре. Мне очень понравилось как получилось, очень ярко и прикольно. Плела не долго, достаточно легко, схема суперская! За неё автору отдельная благодарность). Схема бесплатная, её можете увидеть на канале автора. Канал …

🥰7❤3🔥3😍2☃1💘1🥴1

30 Nov 2025, 14:33 UTC420 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

И ещё одна🥰. https://t.me/+oBurmdu6qQE3ZmYy Макака на 3 человек).

🍓4💘2❤1🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @eleabiser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨Beads_Elea✨” (@eleabiser), 201 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/eleabiser.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.