Channel
@mooshi_room
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,036subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002140926246 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mooshi_room |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mooshi_room |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 1,036 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:21 | 1,037 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:00 | 1,036 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 1,036 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
528 reactions across 14 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5352808571249632330 | 152 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5354783002075352156 | 151 | 28.6% | |
| 🍓 | 49 | 9.28% | |
| ❤🔥 | 42 | 7.95% | |
| 🔥 | 39 | 7.39% | |
| 🎉 | 34 | 6.44% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 3.98% | |
| 💋 | 20 | 3.79% | |
| 😭 | 20 | 3.79% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 528reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mooshi_room. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2026 to 21 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы спокойно можете пользоваться и активничать в телеграме?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 535280857124963233024❤🔥4custom 53547830020753521562🔥1
Signed kus
🩶 Не по теме, но, мне кажется, важно 🩶 Как дополнение к посту выше 🩶На счёт ситуации с блокировками — честно? Жопа полная. Я не могла себе представить, что это дойдёт до такого вредительства обычным людям.. надеюсь, что многие продолжают «спокойно» пользоваться телегой, сидят в своих любимых каналах и могут спокойно творить, надеюсь. Я временно ушла с канала до того как зайти почитать посты любимого бисероплетёра …
custom 535280857124963233022custom 53547830020753521568🍓3🔥1
Signed kus
Уф, давно меня не было тут… Но сейчас я здесь, наконец показываю вам последние работы с теста (спасибо за участие автору: @xeniaa_bb)… не густо, понимаю 🥹 Пропала я по многим причинам, но основная из них — всем вам известная лень, ну, или может апатия/творческий застой, в любом случае я забила на всевозможные хобби и занятия 🙂 Может это своеобразный отдых? В общем, я набралась смелости написать пост об этом, отпи…
custom 535478300207535215619🍓7custom 53528085712496323304🔥1
Signed kus
Приняла восьмерых девочек в группу, извиняюсь, что с задержкой 💔
😭20custom 53528085712496323305custom 53547830020753521563
Signed kus
В честь этого ссылочка по заявкам на ангела! https://t.me/+Lpzdleo3S0k2NDQy Ссылочка активна до 21:00 по МСК, приму 8 красавиц Девочки мои, будьте счастливы 🌸
custom 535478300207535215639🍓7🥰6
Signed kus
🌸 С 8 марта! 🌸
💋14custom 53547830020753521568🍓3
Signed kus
⭐ Моя любимая парочка ⭐
custom 535280857124963233035🥰15custom 53547830020753521567🍓1💋1🔥1
Signed kus
Закончила отбор ребят в группы, это было рандомно, но многим повезло попасть в обе группы, поздравляю вас💔 Такая акция не первая и не последняя, не грустите, все шансы есть в следующий раз!
🔥27custom 53547830020753521568💋4🍓2
Signed kus
Кхм-кхм, у меня тут 1 марта день рождения, да и ДДС был вчера.. 🎂 Так что поздравляю вас с первым днём весны (остальные подтягивайтесь), желаю тёплого воскресенья и вкусняшек этой весной, а у меня из вкусняшек для вас схемки на Марго и её дочку Удачу 😘 Марго: https://t.me/+4z3CtFBoXPQ0MzJi Удача: https://t.me/+wNtu3o6Jg8dlZmYy Ссылка по заявкам активна до 1 марта 20:00 по МСК Выберу на рандом десять человек в ту…
🎉34🍓11🔥5custom 53547830020753521563❤🔥2
Signed kus
➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Прозвучал верный ответ (я надеялась это будет дольше...), так что представляю вам свою чернышку! Изначально это был мальчик-панк, но серьги испортили мои планы 😐 Так что теперь это.. наверное девочка! ✨Решайте сами, комментарии в вашем распоряжении✨ Кстати, меня пригласила в тест @MASHABISERINK, спасибо ей огромное за это, а то я всё реже плету 🥺 🖤Над фотографией пришлось потрудиться, надеюсь получила…
❤🔥36custom 535280857124963233010🍓4💋1🔥1
Signed kus
Я участвовала в тесте, кто-нибудь сумеет найти мою работу?) А после позже будет пост с работой!
custom 535478300207535215620🍓3
Signed kus
А вот и работы тестировщиков Тест был секретный, звала тех кто есть в тест биг ламы Каналы тестировщиков: @Dasha_beads1 @ami_mari_ami @lisa_biserok @biser_sonyaa @biserinka_mila @amigurumi_RIna @Biser_Cvetik @Ulana_kg @biser_sunnn @miku_beads_xdd72 @Violet_ova_5 @mooshi_room @bead_magic744 @nia_beads Оценку этим прекрасным ламам, а я завтра открою набор в сп)
custom 535478300207535215622🍓3🔥2custom 53528085712496323302
Signed kus
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @mooshi_room. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вы спокойно можете пользоваться и активничать в телеграме?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2026 to 21 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 504,542 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@mooshi_room named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•°𝙼𝚘𝚘𝚜𝚑𝚒°•_𝚋𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚜” (@mooshi_room), 1,036 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mooshi_room.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.