Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Payment - BTC ads

Channel

Payment - BTC ads

@earnbtcbywatchingads

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,351subscribers

-875 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002107292889
TypeChannel
Username@earnbtcbywatchingads
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/earnbtcbywatchingads

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

24.8 average views per post against 40,351 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.061%. Across the 23,106 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,623–99,978 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.82% and 16.0%, with a median of 7.24%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (19 July 2026 18 August 2026)
Posts measured268 of 268 published in the window (268 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled6,633
Mature posts only0.084% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers40,351 measured 18 August 2026
Cohortb31623 · 23,106 channels · p10 0.911% · p25 2.82% · p50 7.24% · p75 16.0% · p90 28.9%
Position in cohort0.909th percentile · 1/125 the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.072% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

40,35141,22640,788.57 August 2026 — 41,226 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,226 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,143 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,009 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,912 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,810 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,725 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,643 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,543 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,423 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,351 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 11 days, net -875. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,220–41,357 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 15:3740,351-72
17 Aug 2026, 12:0640,423-120
16 Aug 2026, 04:2440,543-100
14 Aug 2026, 16:4640,643-82
13 Aug 2026, 10:2640,725-85
12 Aug 2026, 08:5240,810-102
11 Aug 2026, 08:0340,912-97
10 Aug 2026, 09:0141,009-43
9 Aug 2026, 12:0141,052-91
8 Aug 2026, 09:0441,143-83
7 Aug 2026, 12:4641,226no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:3941,226first reading

Engagement

268 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.061%
avg views ÷ 40,351 subscribers
Avg views / post
24.8
268 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
268
of 268 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 August 2026
Posts held268 (6 August 202618 August 2026)
Views total6,633
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC8 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1qmv0nwxz4kkzmr4lqd8ssmpf795tjhhkpvwqs8s ▪ Amount: 0.00058058 Bitcoin e10858ca0f4dc9eeafbfe79f1a20321506639b57dcee74f1b7872a332245fc74 ---------------------------------

18 Aug 2026, 10:37 UTC12 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1qyt7uknxa3gwtps6jpwvpt66vku5z22xeh39zt7 ▪ Amount: 0.00055965 Bitcoin 39aea586b6c84360a9a409cdb97619a8e718ad1c54bade839c6390d939b763ec ---------------------------------

18 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC23 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1qld2y2mz4yhg2z8vn20qtjw023kgv0wdq95w65m ▪ Amount: 0.00054457 Bitcoin 378dd017f75eb679121c631e4a7be04c47c31dbced52eb5ffcba5a16e8f5bb02 ---------------------------------

18 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC24 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1qw79d60xl7r2rwsdtnw5jh5jvyf8vsm4zysltqm ▪ Amount: 0.00052848 Bitcoin 569a6c65b8c99cdb1b1a638e1469e9f0607d567c959e17c22fd8343aae13caeb ---------------------------------

18 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTC32 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1pmgetq2exz58mpc3rp04esv4cmh7hy8s644wevyrm2g24qr82lylsktgqxw ▪ Amount: 0.00051649 Bitcoin a4373826ce21d7d791480a3284b0fd69cc8f5766d5c7cdbf072b463ef6089202 ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 23:32 UTC36 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1q5vcvzgn04a7x74cez96pqmnr90fxl3aeckncsr ▪ Amount: 0.00056268 Bitcoin fcddd5fa91a9704b5b739a90160a998f0a01053e24e331addaa7e99ff3e8282a ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 20:51 UTC38 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1qlc38az6jn8u0f0yze3x7tqzyr8xh2dklef2pr0 ▪ Amount: 0.00051204 Bitcoin 8712283b58bd0523904e388c1c7dbe06c946a9b4b7b1ecc915c44d9f960db2e0 ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC32 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1qschdhu49wea4tm8cpv64tt4k6v6sepkgtqaw5tz8c8c05f7kj38sdfr925 ▪ Amount: 0.00054439 Bitcoin 656aec676a77db3c71c3f20a8785933c1b0d6b905bb4219586a5478b05056ae1 ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC41 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1p979u5ufyxx3j90n3n6t6t90al3wxvpdkkyczw97ljcny9guxf98sg732sg ▪ Amount: 0.00051771 Bitcoin 2900199b8d1cb8a3a50ec9adf8b1e168e12d43948cf8540bdf9022eee8d18bf4 ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 16:25 UTC42 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: 33cUMYjuaJsHvUHSXeXwwmLNZ19m5EkmYK ▪ Amount: 0.00057254 Bitcoin 94aee8ea52ec6ec03788a98f69ed48af0774b99226f642b432ecd55fd4ce56b4 ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC38 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1q2ql8c44ska3vxk09yd4qkfugaqya4kxwdn29s2 ▪ Amount: 0.00053265 Bitcoin e48cc68555d3f3a81004cdc12eeb019da7952c0df9eadf13577e54feebf203fc ---------------------------------

17 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC47 viewsread 18 August 2026
Photo

🎊 Successful withdrawal 🎊 ▪ To: bc1q5ryprnwzsvcyv9l8gatzxkldgl8766l8xehknt ▪ Amount: 0.0005376 Bitcoin df27132d306163061f354e6e60b19bdc9835a0c68daeadcfd0d793a3c8e3058d ---------------------------------

Showing the 12 most recent of 268 posts we hold for @earnbtcbywatchingads. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Fun Game 👾
@Sfungame · 106,808
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Payment - BTC ads” (@earnbtcbywatchingads), 40,351 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/earnbtcbywatchingads.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.