Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Payments - Bitcoin Farm

Channel

Payments - Bitcoin Farm

@pays_bitcoin_farm_z

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,163subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692379283
TypeChannel
Username@pays_bitcoin_farm_z
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded30 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pays_bitcoin_farm_z

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1631,1841,173.530 August 2026 — 1,184 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,184 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,181 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,172 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,170 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,163 subscribers30 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 16 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,160–1,187 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 07:561,163-7
12 Sept 2026, 21:231,170-2
8 Sept 2026, 18:161,172-9
3 Sept 2026, 09:231,181+1
31 Aug 2026, 11:461,180-4
30 Aug 2026, 22:001,184no change
30 Aug 2026, 21:451,184first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.593%
avg views ÷ 1,163 subscribers
Avg views / post
6.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 August 2026
Posts held20 (26 August 202630 August 2026)
Views total138
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 22:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

30 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC5 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: 3MwDTe3QpvwyNC94GGgizpqYNTqWs6QEJq 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.000204 BTC ~ 2040 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: 61b60eb2178192b37d4f95fa0e510829d1a278d9bd7407bf0c6b55e5b34848a6

30 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC5 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: 1EmH249fGjEBRmBshSod6hBFHUKRNcyuSK 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.000103 BTC ~ 1030 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: 315882aef4ff6873e57fe12737bf91cbd881ec2aae64bf772c37204cf87ed668

30 Aug 2026, 09:33 UTC7 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: bc1qhv3xe0zzfg83lesmlkdnushzjgxuj742e8wyau 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00025 BTC ~ 2500 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: b65dbbcf43e1d4a5c088636015f5d6ea1e609139f987d17e1efd5b9b39e15f3c

30 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC6 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: 3NxvMK77F2tyEc3r7Q8a1t8ZYoZRz82K63 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00012 BTC ~ 1200 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: a22e19e1a07f0df9f97c3d90f065ef091baef65619bdc217983a9d799984eb2e

30 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC5 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: bc1pwq6r378ewrzkua659j7kjr9yrc4ta5wxfedelummt9se8daa4rtscv7vv4 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00012 BTC ~ 1200 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: e1ad255635793a24951ea94d891f058ef81333dc41f4e93b3b9d6dc63dca151e

29 Aug 2026, 22:49 UTC3 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: 3JqzFsm3UZJz4fxSpFHnbav6NwCHeCg3vY 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00024 BTC ~ 2400 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: a9c0f47055b95deaa22e4e7c60e1e7e1e49dadc4cb00d783c2153d7b450b2860

29 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC3 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: bc1q7jt5akrsa5enndc9nl5s65vymrnzl2yyvqpzhx 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.000129 BTC ~ 1290 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: 39663f948d82c2f7f963b10e5ea1b23e1b90169f043bdfdcf8389973b80268f9

29 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC3 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: bc1qzkhjj045x9stantd0m53v80czw6al6unjyhq0z 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.000131 BTC ~ 1310 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: 90fdcebc23d15be9885ae14f11860106ce5445ca02b8be1efc086a8282c686be

29 Aug 2026, 19:39 UTC3 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: bc1qezkcspc4eksym84vlz6dzsjamtpluu5w73uj84 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00024 BTC ~ 2400 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: c394a4647be6ed48e8290da06276311db9989829f1c98e5b5c379ffb6f163b4a

29 Aug 2026, 17:42 UTC4 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: bc1qrvc732qnjmh9zt3pxlv9nrz96e2eh9s3y4te77 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00015 BTC ~ 1500 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: f534d7fa4c7620813321c1a74e39f98fc8c799859cd2bb9f7fda530b258fe582

29 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC4 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: 1PPnGXe8efropz6xiDCUxgHjJSu14rsqi 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.00014 BTC ~ 1400 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: 7a5a0eb9d3489086e11dfa95ab1f02d683290bbc6bec90ec2ec7617be4735ef3

28 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC8 viewsread 30 August 2026

💸 New Withdrawal Sent 💸 🔹 To wallet: 3DjuNW3sE3pGxV6cSWpyQ3CApjdejHRyZ2 🔹 Amount withdrawn: 0.000258 BTC ~ 2580 💎 🌐 Transaction ID: ed63aa598c06bc04f30d01b517d98851bdc33e7c9c5566cc150dec2f25de0151

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pays_bitcoin_farm_z. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Payment - BTC ads
@earnbtcbywatchingads · 38,215
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 30 August 2026
PelicanCasino
@pelicancasino · 35,148
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Payments - Bitcoin Farm” (@pays_bitcoin_farm_z), 1,163 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pays_bitcoin_farm_z.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.