Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Proof - Get Free Bitcoin ๐ŸŽ

Channel

Proof - Get Free Bitcoin ๐ŸŽ

@proof_get_free_bitcoin

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Channels linked by matching posts ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

9,200subscribers

-1,284 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001557711021
TypeChannel
Username@proof_get_free_bitcoin
Description@get_free_bitcoin_now_bot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held44
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/proof_get_free_bitcoin

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 31% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegramโ€™s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts โ€” open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19404 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC@Bxitcoin/30167 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC1.008.3 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19408 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 17:46 UTC@Bxitcoin/30417 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC1.003.2 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19411 ยท this entry7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC@Bxitcoin/30467 Aug 2026, 22:21 UTC1.005 minutes
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19418 ยท this entry8 Aug 2026, 04:19 UTC@Bxitcoin/30628 Aug 2026, 06:47 UTC1.002.5 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19420 ยท this entry8 Aug 2026, 10:31 UTC@Bxitcoin/30868 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC1.002.9 hours
@proof_get_free_bitcoin/19474 ยท this entry12 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC@Bxitcoin/337412 Aug 2026, 20:52 UTC1.006.5 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Bxitcoin58 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.7 hoursthis entry (58โ€“0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp โ€” in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

โ€œPublished firstโ€ means first in this corpus. We hold 309 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detectorโ€™s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @proof_get_free_bitcoin โ€” which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. โ€œFirstโ€ could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channelโ€™s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a โ€œForwarded fromโ€ credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying โ€” a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story โ€” and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,20010,4849,8427 August 2026 โ€” 10,484 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 10,480 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 10,467 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 10,453 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 10,439 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 10,424 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 10,408 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 10,397 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 10,381 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 10,364 subscribers17 August 2026 โ€” 10,344 subscribers18 August 2026 โ€” 10,326 subscribers19 August 2026 โ€” 10,307 subscribers20 August 2026 โ€” 10,296 subscribers21 August 2026 โ€” 10,283 subscribers22 August 2026 โ€” 10,262 subscribers24 August 2026 โ€” 10,232 subscribers25 August 2026 โ€” 10,201 subscribers26 August 2026 โ€” 10,185 subscribers27 August 2026 โ€” 10,180 subscribers28 August 2026 โ€” 10,169 subscribers29 August 2026 โ€” 10,148 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 10,135 subscribers30 August 2026 โ€” 10,122 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 10,101 subscribers1 September 2026 โ€” 10,091 subscribers3 September 2026 โ€” 10,072 subscribers4 September 2026 โ€” 10,057 subscribers7 September 2026 โ€” 10,005 subscribers10 September 2026 โ€” 9,949 subscribers14 September 2026 โ€” 9,892 subscribers18 September 2026 โ€” 9,832 subscribers29 September 2026 โ€” 9,692 subscribers6 October 2026 โ€” 9,585 subscribers13 October 2026 โ€” 9,517 subscribers15 October 2026 โ€” 9,486 subscribers18 October 2026 โ€” 9,446 subscribers22 October 2026 โ€” 9,385 subscribers25 October 2026 โ€” 9,352 subscribers28 October 2026 โ€” 9,330 subscribers31 October 2026 โ€” 9,303 subscribers3 November 2026 โ€” 9,274 subscribers6 November 2026 โ€” 9,239 subscribers9 November 2026 โ€” 9,200 subscribers7 August 20269 November 2026
44 measurements spanning 95 days, net -1,284. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 9,007โ€“10,677 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 44
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 17:369,200-39
6 Nov 2026, 15:009,239-35
3 Nov 2026, 09:179,274-29
31 Oct 2026, 18:089,303-27
28 Oct 2026, 10:559,330-22
25 Oct 2026, 04:489,352-33
22 Oct 2026, 07:279,385-61
18 Oct 2026, 15:299,446-40
15 Oct 2026, 17:299,486-31
13 Oct 2026, 03:509,517-68
6 Oct 2026, 10:229,585-107
29 Sept 2026, 00:429,692-140
18 Sept 2026, 21:199,832-60
14 Sept 2026, 06:389,892-57
10 Sept 2026, 22:389,949-56
7 Sept 2026, 22:1910,005-52
4 Sept 2026, 22:0010,057-15
3 Sept 2026, 06:2610,072-19
1 Sept 2026, 22:2610,091-10
1 Sept 2026, 00:3610,101first reading

Engagement

313 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
0.461%
avg views รท 9,200 subscribers
Avg views / post
42.4
70 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
70
of 313 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held313 (5 August 2026 โ€“ 14 November 2026)
Views total2,967
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 00:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
โ‰ˆ20,200

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 0 of 70 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 00:25 UTC4 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qpjxw4kwyyrp4yhgcyd60v3zsfnw9sp0fx7wedw ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00134 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 63736c44bcb4659bcb4fd0c6fdbc139afa94a9e9c3690f339bf05df8122b520e

13 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC11 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1ql3343cqsqc90tpkpfpjm5y7ff48a2rpfs93k0g ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001566 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: c10a8776d95e557dd639888e53b47447a9adf49acdf597f4f7bab162e9274d5d

13 Nov 2026, 18:20 UTC17 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1quykurv7eke02epqzsjn6n7launv9qky2lt9dv6 ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.002275 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: cb10e2053f605d2da19ace8839fba82970f156d3e7ae33020e688382d33050db

13 Nov 2026, 02:05 UTC33 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: 1YMtLe86jmapwJVJqP14jqcAfee5Hz86D ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00105 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 3d0ca89f632275161adfbd3c34cfe14783fd47462fa5a50134a0a9161d8e5763

12 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC39 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qehm755p4dfrrutfrs36aep9mvf6tpdgths960y ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.002781 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: e10af32e76f353eeaba79477c82674640e15c98990ff12656eda484edcb2850a

12 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC37 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qwj38efutqefrm9fkje9wlexyyr656p6tr073tf ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.0022 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 8b02c3d70b9e90b72effeeadb2936a6dd1bbd65dea51061b4631d588a1d5a598

12 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC31 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qjxhjl9q89yl6xe4gzfswgxtv9hksyp4p6rwmxz ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.002421 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 07021eb0fb1262e8f52d38b6379a04f51157dd71b001006ad803f03b9cbc00a7

12 Nov 2026, 15:41 UTC29 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q9p0j4an5e8qcjerarjw4w0mertdck0ngw8nxh8 ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00136 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 56a704b81a340cb0b31f5fcee4a94abad5a28eb3ee1d8e0e7a58db617f124968

12 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC29 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qfw0g04aucahkymm570uq8lj3sepjvl8putj4yd ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.001275 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: ba5bce0d5b7b9e2c631b719dcb4d27bebd3e7df762dddd1d504a1fdbda579b72

12 Nov 2026, 11:52 UTC28 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q4mjrwh92nvzmuspxuzh8yu3hzllmelz4xdg2ns ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00207 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 04a62b93e806ea1fbb7243d93fda24d1e45da0cba04830ab8a797dcc7781cac9

12 Nov 2026, 10:51 UTC28 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1qdtc8mxhhn6vffkr7n25udjszk4kh74dp87gttl ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.002352 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 1f02562148a7f419e32919e0303e5ad9887143d61ee3013365e0537275953d85

12 Nov 2026, 07:55 UTC29 viewsread 14 November 2026

๐Ÿ’ธ New Withdrawal Sent ๐Ÿ’ธ ๐Ÿ”น To wallet: bc1q9ss0fq9u056wrkdhgnruyej5mtxxxch6ercyjc ๐Ÿ”น Amount withdrawn: 0.00115 BTC ๐ŸŒ Transaction ID: 31f3e646745fc79825798ab4919c9e7caf2b07288853476208ae78567ecc5eb7

Showing the 12 most recent of 313 posts we hold for @proof_get_free_bitcoin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Payment - BTC ads
@earnbtcbywatchingads ยท 34,790
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 35 here โ€” alongside 34 others โ€” read 30 August 2026
BDWIN 24๐Ÿšฆ๐†๐€๐Œ๐„ 69โ„ข ๐•๐ˆ๐ ๐†๐‘๐Ž๐”๐ ๐Ÿ“Š
@riham69team ยท 25,020
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 37 here โ€” alongside 36 others โ€” read 8 September 2026
TronMine News
@tronxomine ยท 46,240
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 50 here โ€” alongside 49 others โ€” read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œProof - Get Free Bitcoin ๐ŸŽโ€ (@proof_get_free_bitcoin), 9,200 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/proof_get_free_bitcoin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.