Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Центр дизайн-мышления

Channel

Центр дизайн-мышления

@dtcenter_global

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,042subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001317034349
TypeChannel
Username@dtcenter_global
Created1 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dtcenter_global

Growth

4,0424,0544,0487 August 2026 — 4,054 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,054 subscribers10 August 2026 — 4,048 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,047 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,042 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 8 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,040–4,056 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 20:274,042-5
12 Aug 2026, 19:534,047-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:014,048-6
7 Aug 2026, 08:314,054no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:294,054first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.13%
avg views ÷ 4,042 subscribers
Avg views / post
329
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held10 (8 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,972
Reactions total47
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

81 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3745.7%
🔥2227.2%
❤‍🔥1012.3%
💯44.94%
🙏33.70%
👌22.47%
🤩22.47%
👏11.23%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC160 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥹🥹 Клиентский опыт держит бизнес на уровне во время кризиса! В рамках нашей программы «Директор по клиентскому опыту» вышел новый практикум на данную тему. 🙂 Эксперт — Ольга Байбакова, руководитель качества сервиса в MANTERA. 🙂 Внутри: деконструкция стратегии CX-команды, которая принесла профит во время сжатия туристического рынка. Темы: ▶️ Как превратить CX из гипотез в один из ведущих инструментов управления к

3

5 Aug 2026, 10:54 UTC227 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Решим системную проблему вашей компании ✅ Мы открываем конкурсный отбор проектов от бизнеса для нового потока нашего курса по международной сертификации практиков дизайн-мышления d.standards. 👉Участие полностью БЕСПЛАТНО Кому мы уже помогли: Билайн, Газпромбанк, Head Hunter, ИКЕА, Циан, X5 Retail Group Польза для вашего бизнеса: 🟣 Получите готовые и протестированные решения на основе исследований ваших пользовате

1🙏1

30 Jul 2026, 15:04 UTC342 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Исследователь или Тренер: разница уровней дизайн-мышления 🏹 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 Вы идете в «поле» — проводите CustDev, строите путь клиента и быстро собираете прототип, чтобы проверить гипотезы. 🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂 Через обсуждение вовлекаете всех участников команды, помогаете им пересобрать продукт и мыслить болями пользователя. Оба сценария — про дизайн-мышление. Но требуют они совершенно разных навыков. Мы развиваем междунаро

3🔥3🙏2

28 Jul 2026, 15:31 UTC441 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Дизайн‑мыслители, общий сбор! 15 сентября Большая онлайн‑встреча от Центра дизайн-мышления 🔥 ⚡️ Зафиксируем, что бизнес ждет от дизайн-мышления, какие инструменты и компетенции помогают оставаться сильным специалистом. За последние годы запрос на архитекторов систем, интересов и изменений только вырос. На встрече обсудим: 🟢 как эволюционируют дизайн-мышление и человекоцентричное проектирование; 🟢 новые вызовы, кот

4🔥3👌2👏1

23 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC412 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как меняется корпоративная лояльность в 2026 году Любой специалист с опытом принимает решения без жалости к проблемам бизнеса. Главные ценности — личный успех и доход — превалируют над комфортом на знакомом месте. Разбираем 5 главных трендов, которые на это повлияли ✍️ Сокращения могут коснуться каждого, лояльность больше не гарантирует защиту. Мы стали относиться к карьере как к собственному бизнесу. Диверсифика

❤‍🔥5🔥54

20 Jul 2026, 17:12 UTC390 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

5 авторитетных систем сертификации для тренеров и фасилитаторов ✅ ✏️ Рассмотрим системы, которые охватывают ключевые направления специализации: от дизайн-мышления до работы с эмоциональным интеллектом и культурным разнообразием. 1️⃣ d.standards, дизайн-мышление Международная система, сертифицирующая экспертов в области дизайн-мышления — классического человеко-центричного подхода для создания инноваций. 💗 Для кого

🔥43💯2❤‍🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 16:07 UTC398 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Забота о клиентах в каждой детали ❤️ Большая ценность в том, чтобы сохранять эмпатию даже в трудные рабочие периоды. Вы можете не замечать критических мелочей, когда: ➕ Клиент не находит оптимальный для себя вариант ➕ Не хватает уточняющих вопросов к человеку ➕ Вы перемудрили над цифровым сервисом Всё исправимо, так что если вы узнали себя в карточках — это главный шаг к позитивным переменам. Клиентский опыт - от

🔥32

13 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC417 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥇 LEGO Serious Play для стратегических сессий LSP используют для решения серьезных бизнес-задач: разработки стратегии, поиска новых продуктов, анализа клиентского опыта. Главная идея — «мышление руками» Когда человек строит модель, он задействует не только логическое мышление, но и пространственное воображение. Благодаря этому появляются осязаемые идеи. 💡Исследования в области нейронауки также показывают, что мот

9🤩2🔥1

10 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC425 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

2️⃣ 😍😍😍😍😍 карточек с простыми решениями бизнес-проблем 💘 ▶️возвращаем лояльность клиентов ▶️делаем интерфейс оптимальным ▶️не тушим, а решаем конфликты Используйте выходные для восстановления — не забывайте заботиться о себе и коллегах 🌸

6🔥3❤‍🔥2

8 Jul 2026, 14:37 UTC462 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как сплотить и успокоить команду, когда бизнес несет убытки 👥 ❌ Много новых совещаний или оптимизация плана — это короткий путь к выгоранию команды и неудачным тестам. Попробуйте такой подход: ⭐️ Фокус на человеке. Ищите боли клиентов и сотрудников через факты (обращения в поддержку, просадка клиентских показателей), а не ощущения. ⭐️ Следите за логикой эмоций на пути клиентов, чтобы объективно подсветить слабые то

2❤‍🔥2💯2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @dtcenter_global. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 242,473 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Центр дизайн-мышления” (@dtcenter_global), 4,042 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dtcenter_global.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.