Channel
@fabrika_gipotez
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1,557subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001675104514 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fabrika_gipotez |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fabrika_gipotez |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 1,557 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 1,560 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,563 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 1,563 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 February 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 127 |
| Reactions total | 4 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
141 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 74 | 52.5% | |
| 🔥 | 48 | 34.0% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 7.80% | |
| 🦄 | 5 | 3.55% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 2.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Конференция, которая закончилась контрактами На конференциях меня давно интересует не программа, а плотность людей в зале. Доклад можно посмотреть в записи, а вот разговор на кофе-брейке, нельзя. ProductSense — одна из немногих конференций, где это соотношение в порядке. Прошлая конференция для меня закончилась очень полезно — и часть контактов, которые я оттуда увёз, потом конвертировалась в контракты и сильные п…
❤2🔥2
Почему уходят клиенты? Большинство коммуникаций с клиентом в сервисном бизнесе — это «довольны работой?». Да и в любом b2b на самом деле. Из-за этого проекты закрываются «нормально» даже тогда, когда клиент недоволен. Мы об этом просто не узнаём вовремя. А когда клиент потом уходит и не продлевает контракт — разводим руками и спрашиваем: «а что мы могли сделать?». На самом деле могли. Задавать вопросы. Не два, а пя…
🔥5❤2👍1
Клиентский опыт будущего 📍28 мая на мероприятии «Клиентский путь в ритейле» поговорим про лучшие практики клиентского пути в ритейле и новые стратегии их решения. ⚡️Дискуссия начнется с диагностики новых ограничений бизнеса в России: новые переломные точки и внешние экономические факторы. Отдельное внимание будет уделено методам глобального прогнозирования. 🪓 Затем следует блок вопросов по цифровой среде, управлен…
❤1🔥1🦄1
Пока в медиа говорят о кадровом голоде, фактические показатели рисуют другую картину В декабре hh-индекс по России вырос до 8,6, а в Москве – до 10,6.Это значит, что на одну вакансию приходится 9-11 кандидатов. Для сравнения: в начале 2024 года – 3,5, в 2025 – 4,8. Уровень конкуренции сопоставим с пандемийным. 👉🏻 В такой реальности многое меняется. Опора только на фулл-тайм всё чаще оказывается уязвимой, особенно д…
❤6🔥6👍4
Сохраняете ли вы резервы в бизнесе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔2
Опрос для предпринимателей: Какой запас фин. подушки вы держите у себя в бизнесе, чтобы не переживать о кассовых разрывах и зарплатах? (Отдельно можете написать: разделяете ли вы финансовую подушку и бюджеты на развитие/спец проекты)
Инструменты для создания продуктов, которые нужны рынку⚡️ Обещал, что с изменением формата не пропадут инструменты для развития бизнеса и собрал целую подборку от друзей из Центра дизайн-мышления: ✍️ Методики для прокачки креативности и ее регулярного использования. ✍️ Метакомпетенции: навыки, от которых зависит обучение, карьера и жизнь. ✍️ Как эффективно управлять командой: обзор фреймворков от вотерфолла до ка…
❤9🔥2
Выиграли «булшит бинго» В одном из недавних разговоров (Анатолий привет) мы затронули одну из интересных проблем в исследованиях. Ребята внутри называют ее: Выиграли «булшит бинго» — что значит получить социально ожидаемые ответы. Исследование провели, но инсайтов не получили. По факту команда получила то, что уже и так знала сама. Какие проблемы могут к этому привести: Проблема постановки задачи — какой бриф, так…
🔥8❤1
Созидатели и Потребители В мире, на текущий момент, люди будут сильно, даже полярно, отличаться одним простым свойством: • одни будут создавать, и неважно будет это контент, ИТ программа, бизнес или продукты производства • вторая категория людей, занимается «потребительством». Они употребляют контент, тратят свое время в социальных сетях, тратят деньги, время и фокус внимания на то, что создала первая категория. Но…
🔥4🦄3
Ну что? Как у кого дела? У меня ощущение, что жизнь последние лет 10 готовила меня к этому моменту: жизни в тотальной неопределенности. Сначала стартап, потом акселераторы и работа с десятками проектов по преодоление неопределенности, потом инновации в России и сейчас исследования, которые чаще тоже на этапе: "ничего не понятно, но вы помогите" И вроде динамика у нас хорошая, 1 квартал мы закрыли хорошо, но ощущен…
🔥7👍1🦄1
Решил немного переформатировать канал, так как есть некоторые посты, которые не ложились в формат канала. Предпринимательство — это не только пошаговый план и методология запуска бизнеса, но и борьба с "тараканами" фаундера и команды, мысли, кризисы и перспективные возможности. Подумал, что вам будет интереснее читать не только полезные подборки инструментов (что конечно не уйдет), но и вдохнуть немного жизни в кан…
❤25🤔1
Чем оборачивается незнание своего клиента? Инфопространство переполнено жалующимися селлерами на маркетплейсах: как закручивают гайки, как падают продажи, как всё плохо. Опустим сейчас экономический цикл, макроситуацию и снижение доходов населения — оставим эти темы иранистам и специалистам по ковиду… Вы поняли 🙂 Я хочу поговорить вот о чем: Доступ к клиенту у селлеров на маркетплейсах — практически нулевой. Кром…
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @fabrika_gipotez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Сохраняете ли вы резервы в бизнесе?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы считаете, что является главным "тормозом" вашего роста прямо сейчас?
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 910,447 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Андрей Краснопеев | Фабрика Гипотез” (@fabrika_gipotez), 1,557 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fabrika_gipotez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.