Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
57 measurements spanning 89 days, net +1,157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,386–22,928 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 18:19
22,721
+1
3 Nov 2026, 19:01
22,720
-15
2 Nov 2026, 16:21
22,735
-2
1 Nov 2026, 16:38
22,737
-13
31 Oct 2026, 17:00
22,750
+9
30 Oct 2026, 17:55
22,741
+10
28 Oct 2026, 17:57
22,731
+3
27 Oct 2026, 17:29
22,728
+6
26 Oct 2026, 16:46
22,722
+5
25 Oct 2026, 13:55
22,717
-4
24 Oct 2026, 13:40
22,721
+8
23 Oct 2026, 12:04
22,713
-4
22 Oct 2026, 12:00
22,717
+1
21 Oct 2026, 02:00
22,716
+3
20 Oct 2026, 01:36
22,713
+11
19 Oct 2026, 05:07
22,702
+4
18 Oct 2026, 02:28
22,698
+1
17 Oct 2026, 03:37
22,697
+3
16 Oct 2026, 00:40
22,694
+4
14 Oct 2026, 22:46
22,690
first reading
Engagement
188 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.6%
avg views ÷ 22,721 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,120
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 188 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
188 (3 August 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
271,590
Reactions total
9,118
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 02:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈293
Videos
≈1,130
Links
≈98
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
7h 32m
Average length
4m 07s
Measured directly from 110 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
28,089 reactions across 166 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
15,075
53.7%
👍
9,074
32.3%
💯
1,650
5.87%
🔥
747
2.66%
🙏
465
1.66%
👌
252
0.897%
😁
186
0.662%
👏
93
0.331%
🤣
90
0.32%
😱
83
0.295%
❤🔥
77
0.274%
🥰
77
0.274%
😢
68
0.242%
🤔
51
0.182%
💩
27
0.096%
🎉
12
0.043%
🤗
11
0.039%
👀
10
0.036%
👎
8
0.028%
🤮
6
0.021%
10 further kinds
27
0.096%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 166 of the 188 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28,089 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 188 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 166 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drdubuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 188 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Головне - загальний стан людини.
Не кожному можна проводити процедури. Якщо
людина фізично не здатна їх витримати через високий тиск, надлишкову вагу чи супутні захворювання, потрібно вміти делікатно відмовити людині. Але зазвичай люди мене не чують і критично сприймають таку інформацію.
Я розумію, що люди шукають порятунку, хапаються за будь-яку можливість. Особливо старші люди, які часто стають жертвами обману в ін…
Як ви думаєте, що в цьому випадку є
першопричиною?
Грижа міжхребцевого диска, викривлення поперекового відділу хребта та компресія нервового корінця зліва?
Чи все ж таки коксартроз лівого кульшового суглоба, порушення біомеханіки таза та хребта і, як можливий наслідок, формування міжхребцевої грижі?
То що було першим - яйце чи курка?
Дубук✊ pinned «Зараз активно займаюся консультаціями в Одесі +380992252098 Львів - планую з 11 листопада +380 95 949 15 91 Контенту трохи менше, вибачте не встигаю 🙌 Київ - працює стабільно +380 50 651 06 86✊»
Коксартроз. Коли потрібна операція?
Клінічний розбір.
На які симптоми варто звернути увагу?
1. Біль.
Не завжди болить сам кульшовий суглоб. Біль може виникати в паху, попереку, передній поверхні стегна або коліні. Часто його плутають із проблемами хребта чи сідничного нерва.
2. Зменшення об’єму м’язів.
Поступово зменшується об’єм стегна та сідниці з боку ураженого суглоба.
3. Порушення ходи.
Людина починає кульг…
Зараз активно займаюся консультаціями в Одесі +380992252098
Львів - планую з 11 листопада +380 95 949 15 91
Контенту трохи менше, вибачте не встигаю 🙌
Київ - працює стабільно +380 50 651 06 86✊
Це ми вам кланяємося! ❤️
Дякую вам за такі щирі, теплі та приємні слова!
Я прекрасно розумію всі ваші хвилювання, переживання та сподівання. Але повірте, ми хвилюємося не менше за вас. Адже за кожною людиною, яка до нас звертається, стоїть своя історія, свій біль і своя надія.
Від себе особисто та від усього нашого одеського колективу хочу висловити щиру подяку за вашу довіру, підтримку й такі приємні слова.🫂
Клінічний випадок.Розбір кейсу✊
Пацієнтка, 62 роки. АТ 140/80. Тривалий час вела сидячий спосіб життя та вирішила почати силові тренування. І це великий плюс!
Але вже через тиждень до програми додали вправи на відведення та приведення стегон у тренажері.
Результат-біль у паховій ділянці та по передній поверхні стегна.
Далі - походи по лікарях, призначення прегабаліну, який пацієнтка приймає й досі. Причину болю пере…
З віком старіє не лише наша шкіра. Ми поступово втрачаємо мʼязову масу, силу та витривалість.
І знаєте, що цікаво? За шкірою ми звикли доглядати. Купуємо креми, відвідуємо косметологів, засмучуємося коли бачимо морщини, намагаємося якомога довше зберегти молодість.
А от про мʼязи чомусь згадуємо лише тоді, коли стає важко піднятися сходами, присісти або просто встати з крісла. Але це вже пізно
Косметика допомагає нам…
Чому люди падають у старшому віці? Насамперед через загальну слабкість, яка часто виникає внаслідок детренованості організму. Паралельно можуть формуватися й певні органічні зміни в суглобах.
Звісно, мова не йде про травми, новоутворення, інфекційні захворювання та інші патологічні стани.
Давайте розберемося, у чому різниця між спортом і звичайною фізичною активністю або зарядкою. Це зовсім різні речі, які люди чер…
❤81👍40😁14🔥4💩1
Showing the 12 most recent of 188 posts we hold for @drdubuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Юля Может в Эфире @yulia_mozhet_v_efire · 657 (as read 20 September 2026)#67
Медична🇵🇱🩺польська @medkateryna · 925 (as read 20 September 2026)#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Доктор Артем Пак @drartempark · 45,207 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дубук✊” (@drdubuk), 22,721 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drdubuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.