Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

دكتر آذرتاش

@drazartash

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,940subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005675285
TypeChannel
Username@drazartash
Description🌺ما اينجائيم تا با جهل جنسي ناشى از باورهاى غلط مبارزه كنيم https://telegram.me/DrAzartash ارتباط با دكتر آذرتاش @F_Azartash لینک کانالها گروه و اینستا https://telegram.me/DrAzartash1 ☎️جهت مشاوره با دکتر آذرتاش با ایدی@vahedi443هماهنگ فرمایید
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/drazartash

Growth

24,93724,97924,9585 August 2026 — 24,979 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,979 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,977 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,971 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,967 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,959 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,950 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,937 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,940 subscribers24,9405 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,931–24,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:4424,940+3
11 Aug 2026, 07:5124,937-13
10 Aug 2026, 04:2624,950-9
9 Aug 2026, 02:1124,959-8
8 Aug 2026, 02:0124,967-4
7 Aug 2026, 05:1424,971-6
6 Aug 2026, 07:0124,977-2
6 Aug 2026, 02:0224,979no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:1324,979first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.74%
avg views ÷ 24,940 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,180
61 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.878%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
62
of 62 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held62 (2 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total72,130
Reactions total633
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 22:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
11,500
Videos
3,330
Links
4,300

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 37s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

524 reactions across 51 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍30959.0%
12724.2%
💯315.92%
🎉214.01%
👌193.63%
💔101.91%
🙏61.15%
👏10.191%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC937 views14 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @DrAzartash_seminarVideo

🌺پنج نشونه در دیت اول که آینده رابطه رو لو میده! #کانال_دکترآذرتاش #دکترفاطمه_آذرتاش #زوج_درمانی @DrAzartash @Drazartash_seminar

👍11👌1👏1💯1

11 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC809 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⸻ 🌺 ذهن انسان، ناتمام‌ها را بهتر از تمام‌شده‌ها به خاطر می‌سپارد. 🔷🔹در روان‌شناسی، این پدیده «اثر زایگارنیک» (Zeigarnik Effect) نام دارد. به همین دلیل، کارهای نیمه‌تمام، حرف‌های ناتمام یا رابطه‌های بدون پایان روشن، مدت بیشتری ذهن ما را درگیر می‌کنند. 🔷🔹گاهی آنچه رهایمان نمی‌کند، خودِ اتفاق نیست؛ بلکه ناتمام ماندن آن است. 🔹 اگر موضوعی مدام ذهنتان را درگیر کرده است، آن را روی کاغذ بنویسید و برایش یک «پایان موقت» مش

👍72

11 Aug 2026, 10:35 UTC738 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌺قدردانی، روغنِ چرخ‌های رابطه است: 🔴🔺در تکرار روزمره، ما یاد می‌گیریم بدی‌ها را ببینیم و خوبی‌ها را نادیده بگیریم. کوچکترین کارهای خوب همسر را تحسین کنید؛ این کار “ذخیره عاطفی” رابطه را پر می‌کند. @DrAzartash

👍63💯3

11 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC825 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌺پنج عادت ساده که میتونه رابطه‌ات رونجات بده ، گاهی مشكل، كمبود عشق نيست...كمبود اين عادت هاست. 💠🔶بيشتر گوش بده ، كمتردفاع كن همه دوست دارن شنيده بشن. گاهی شريک عاطفيت راه حل نمى خواد، فقط مى خواد دركش كنى. 💠🔶ازتشكر كردن غافل نشو ، رابطه ها معمولاً با اتفاقات بزرگی خراب نمیشن. با نادیده گرفتن كارهاى كوچیک آسيب میبینن 💠🔶اختلاف رو عقب ننداز مشكلى كه درباره ش حرف زده نشه، معمولاً خودش حل نمیشه 🔶💠زمان دونفره بساز حتى

👍143💯3💔2

11 Aug 2026, 05:48 UTC852 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌺🍃🌺🍃🌺🍃🌺🍃 امیدوارم رها بشید، از رنج‌هایی که در موردش با هیچ‌کس صحبت نمی‌کنید. امیدوارم برنده بشید، توی جنگ هایی که در سکوت باهاشون دست و پنجه نرم می‌کنید. امیدوارم برسید، به همون هدفی که صبح تا شب بهش فکر می‌کنید. امیدوارم اونجوری که دوست دارید حل بشه، همون مشکلی که توی خلوت و شلوغی توی ذهنتونه و داره وجود شمارو داغون می‌کنه بدون اینکه بقیه بفهمن. @DrAzartash

23👍9💯4

10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,180 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🌺چیزهایی که قبل از ازدواج کوچک‌اند، بعد از ازدواج بزرگ می‌شوند… 🔴خیلی وقت‌ها آدم‌ها قبل از ازدواج از خودشان می‌پرسند: «دوستم دارد؟» «آدم خوبی است؟» «با هم تفاهم داریم؟» 📌اما سؤال‌های مهم‌تری هم هست که باید پرسید: 🔹 وقتی ناراحت است، چطور رفتار می‌کند؟ 🔹 وقتی با او مخالفی، می‌تواند بدون تحقیر و توهین گفت‌وگو کند؟ 🔹 وقتی اشتباه می‌کند، عذرخواهی می‌کند یا همیشه دنبال مقصر می‌گردد؟ 🔹 در مسائل مالی چقدر مسئولیت‌پذیر

👍194💯2

10 Aug 2026, 11:16 UTC≈1,050 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

5

10 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,050 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🌺۴ تفاوت پارتنر بالغ و نابالغ: 📌وقتى ناراحت ميشه... 🔴نابالغ: قهر ميكنه, ناپدید ميشه يا طرف مقابل رو تنبيه ميكنه ✅بالغ: احساسش رو با احترام بيان ميكنه و درباره مشكل حرف ميزنه 📌وقتى اشتباه ميكنه... 🔴نابالغ: بهونه مياره،انكار ميكنه يا تقصير رو گردن ديگری میندازه.. ✅بالغ:مسئوليت اشتباهش رو ميپذیره و براى جبران تلاش ميكنه. 📌درمورد احساسات... 🔴نابالغ:احساساتش رو سركوب ميكنه يا با عصبانيت بروز ميده . ✅بالغ :احساسات

👍12

10 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,860 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @drazartash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

اگر جای فرد آسیب‌دیده بودید، کدام مورد برایتان آسیب‌زننده‌تر بود؟

  1. خود خیانت43%
  2. افشای تدریجی و قطره چکانی حقیقت11%
  3. دروغ‌های مکرر بعد از خیانت35%
  4. نداشتن شفافیت درباره آینده رابطه19%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 18,642 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🍎 رسانه دکتر سلامت 🍏
@Dr_SalamatX · 169,247
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دكتر آذرتاش” (@drazartash), 24,940 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drazartash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.