Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for دكتر آذرتاش

Channel

دكتر آذرتاش

@drazartash

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

24,739subscribers

-240 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005675285
TypeChannel
Username@drazartash
Description🌺ما اينجائيم تا با جهل جنسي ناشى از باورهاى غلط مبارزه كنيم https://telegram.me/DrAzartash ارتباط با دكتر آذرتاش @F_Azartash لینک کانالها گروه و اینستا https://telegram.me/DrAzartash1 ☎️جهت مشاوره با دکتر آذرتاش با ایدی@vahedi443هماهنگ فرمایید
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/drazartash

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

24,73924,97924,8595 August 2026 — 24,979 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,979 subscribers6 August 2026 — 24,977 subscribers7 August 2026 — 24,971 subscribers8 August 2026 — 24,967 subscribers9 August 2026 — 24,959 subscribers10 August 2026 — 24,950 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24,937 subscribers12 August 2026 — 24,940 subscribers13 August 2026 — 24,937 subscribers14 August 2026 — 24,936 subscribers16 August 2026 — 24,920 subscribers17 August 2026 — 24,911 subscribers18 August 2026 — 24,908 subscribers19 August 2026 — 24,902 subscribers20 August 2026 — 24,901 subscribers21 August 2026 — 24,900 subscribers22 August 2026 — 24,892 subscribers24 August 2026 — 24,881 subscribers25 August 2026 — 24,870 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,862 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,859 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,855 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,849 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,848 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,841 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,828 subscribers4 September 2026 — 24,818 subscribers7 September 2026 — 24,796 subscribers10 September 2026 — 24,785 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24,773 subscribers14 September 2026 — 24,763 subscribers16 September 2026 — 24,750 subscribers18 September 2026 — 24,739 subscribers5 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -240. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,703–25,015 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:5624,739-11
16 Sept 2026, 03:1724,750-13
14 Sept 2026, 06:4024,763-10
12 Sept 2026, 11:4024,773-12
10 Sept 2026, 06:5924,785-11
7 Sept 2026, 03:3924,796-22
4 Sept 2026, 13:3824,818-10
3 Sept 2026, 00:3224,828-13
1 Sept 2026, 01:4424,841-7
30 Aug 2026, 04:0424,848-1
29 Aug 2026, 06:5624,849-6
28 Aug 2026, 03:2324,855-4
27 Aug 2026, 01:4524,859-3
26 Aug 2026, 03:0324,862-8
25 Aug 2026, 03:3724,870-11
24 Aug 2026, 00:0924,881-11
22 Aug 2026, 10:3824,892-8
21 Aug 2026, 02:4524,900-1
20 Aug 2026, 04:4524,901-1
19 Aug 2026, 08:1824,902first reading

Engagement

235 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.98%
avg views ÷ 24,739 subscribers
Avg views / post
986
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.877%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 235 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held235 (2 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total52,232
Reactions total458
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 23:19 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈11,600
Videos
≈3,360
Links
≈4,310

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
10m 45s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,086 reactions across 221 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1,20757.9%
❤54125.9%
🎉1014.84%
💯884.22%
👌562.68%
💔432.06%
🙏160.767%
👏130.623%
😭110.527%
😁50.24%
😍20.096%
🤔10.048%
🤗10.048%
🤨10.048%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 232 of the 235 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 235 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 10:56 UTC635 views7 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🌺چه تفکرات اشتباهی باعث میشه حال ما خراب بشه...؟؟ @DrAzartash

👍7

26 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC610 views5 reactionsread 26 September 2026

🌺علایم خطر در روابط عاطفی (تله آسیب پذیری یا اضطراب) 🟡تمايل داری فردى رو براى زندگی انتخاب كنی كه به شدّت از شما در برابر خطرات و بيمارى ها محافظت و حمايت كنه. همسر یا پارتنرتون بسيار قوى هست و در عوض شما سخت ضعيف و نيازمند هستی.  🟡تمام فكر و ذكر شما اينه كه همسر یا پارتنرتون شجاع باشه، از نظر مالى پيشرفت كنه و هيج آسيب جسمى نبينه. سخت دوست داري كه همسر یا پارتنرت پله هاى موفقيّت رو طىّ كنه. همواره آماده اي كه …

👍5

26 Sept 2026, 10:55 UTC562 views4 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🌺از لحظه‌ای که فکری به ذهنم می‌رسد که مدار عاطفی ذهنم را تحریک می‌کند (مثلا باعث می‌شود احساس عصبانیت کنم) 🔶تا زمانی که واکنش زیستی بدنم به پایان می‌رسد (یعنی مدتی که طول می‌کشد تا آدرنالین به جریان خونم وارد و از آن خارج شود) کمتر از نود ثانیه طول می‌کشد؛ اما خیلی از ما این توانایی را داریم که بیشتر از نود ثانیه عصبانی بمانیم. 🔶این عصبانیت نتیجه آن محرک اولیه نیست. کاری که ما می‌کنیم، این است که آن فکر محرک را دوب…

👍4

26 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC637 views3 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Poll

📌آیا معمولاً منتظری اتفاق بدی بیفته، حتی وقتی دلیل مشخصی برای نگرانی وجود نداره؟

  1. بله55%
  2. خیر45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

26 Sept 2026, 05:34 UTC773 views5 reactionsread 26 September 2026

🌺دلایل شکل گیری تله آسیب پذیری (اضطراب) 🔴ممكنه والدين تون به همين مشكل مبتلا باشن. والدين ترسو و محتاطى داشتی يا در برخى از حوزه هاى خاصّ (مثل ازدست دادن كنترل، بيمارى، ورشكستكى وغيره) آسيب يذير بودن.  🔴والدين تون سخت مراقب شما بودن. مدام درباره خطرات احتمالى به شما هشدار میدادن. با اين هشدار دهى، شما به تدريج احساس كردی كه بسيار ضعيف تر و بى كفايت تر از اون هستي كه بتواني از عهده چالش هاى زندگی روزمره بر بیای (ا…

👍5

26 Sept 2026, 05:34 UTC760 views16 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Photo

🍃🌺🍃🌺🍃🌺🍃🌺 شوپنهاور میگه نباید تو رعایت ادب اونقدر اغراق کنیم که منافعمون قربانی بشه! چون تو با افراط در ادب ممکنه حماقت‌های دیگران و تایید کنی. @DrAzartash

👍14❤2

24 Sept 2026, 10:37 UTC≈1,170 views19 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Video

🌺خودمراقبتی، همیشه به معنی حذف کردن نیست به معنی تنظیم‌ کردنه، طوری که نه تو آسیب ببینی، نه رابطه نابود شه.. این یعنی بلوغ! @DrAzartash

❤13👌6

24 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC≈1,040 views2 reactionsread 26 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🎉2

24 Sept 2026, 10:36 UTC946 views10 reactionsread 26 September 2026

🌺چرا بعضی افراد بعد از خیانت می‌گویند: «فقط یک اشتباه بود»؟ 📌 واژه «اشتباه» گاهی باعث می‌شود تصور کنیم خیانت یک اتفاق لحظه‌ای بوده است. 🔹 اما در بسیاری از موارد، خیانت نتیجه مجموعه‌ای از تصمیم‌هاست؛ از ادامه دادن گفت‌وگوهای پنهانی گرفته تا حفظ ارتباط و عبور از مرزهای رابطه. 🔹 این موضوع به معنای نادیده گرفتن عوامل زمینه‌ای نیست، اما مسئولیت رفتار را هم از بین نمی‌برد. 🔹 پذیرش مسئولیت، اولین قدم برای ترمیم رابطه اس…

👍9💯1

Showing the 12 most recent of 235 posts we hold for @drazartash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTCAnonymous Poll112 voters

📌آیا معمولاً منتظری اتفاق بدی بیفته، حتی وقتی دلیل مشخصی برای نگرانی وجود نداره؟

  1. بله55%
  2. خیر45%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

24 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTCAnonymous Poll110 voters

📌وقتی خودت رو با دیگران مقایسه می‌کنی، معمولاً اولین فکری که از ذهنت می‌گذره چیه؟

  1. کاش منم مثل اون بودم25%
  2. من از اون عقب‌ترم17%
  3. شرایط من با اون فرق داره44%
  4. سعی می‌کنم خودم رو با گذشته‌ی خودم مقایسه کنم24%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

22 Aug 2026, 08:44 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

📌اگه قرار باشه فقط یکی از این ۵ اشتباه رو از رابطه‌ت حذف کنی، کدوم رو انتخاب می‌کنی؟

  1. مقایسه کردن17%
  2. ذهن‌خوانی و حدس زدن18%
  3. کم شدن محبت و توجه22%
  4. نگه داشتن دلخوری‌ها30%
  5. دخالت دادن دیگران24%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

19 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTCAnonymous Poll157 voters

📌اگر کسی در شروع رابطه بسیار مشتاق، صمیمی و پیگیر باشد، اما درست زمانی که رابطه جدی و عمیق می‌شود فاصله بگیرد، به نظر شما بیشتر از چه چیزی می‌ترسد؟

  1. از صمیمیت و آسیب‌پذیر شدن24%
  2. از دست دادن استقلال6%
  3. از تعهد و مسئولیت رابطه57%
  4. اصلاً علاقه‌اش به اندازه‌ای که نشان می‌داده، عمیق نبوده26%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

13 Aug 2026, 07:25 UTCAnonymous Poll138 voters

📌بنظرتون دلیل افشاگری بیش از حد چیه؟

  1. اعتمادِ بیش از حد13%
  2. نیاز به تأیید و توجه26%
  3. تنهایی و نیاز به درد دل36%
  4. هیجان و کنترل نکردن حرف‌ها30%
  5. نداشتن مرزهای مشخص22%

The shares total 127%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

6 Aug 2026, 08:51 UTCAnonymous Poll117 voters

اگر جای فرد آسیب‌دیده بودید، کدام مورد برایتان آسیب‌زننده‌تر بود؟

  1. خود خیانت43%
  2. افشای تدریجی و قطره چکانی حقیقت11%
  3. دروغ‌های مکرر بعد از خیانت35%
  4. نداشتن شفافیت درباره آینده رابطه19%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 235 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

دكتر آذرتاش: دلنوشته ها
@DrAzartash_delneweshteh · 9,545
#1
فايل صوتي دكتر آذرتاش
@DrAzartash_voice · 797
#2
تجربه های صوتیNA(AA)
@abotalebtajrobe12gam · 1,441 (as read 15 September 2026)
#3
🍎 رسانه دکتر سلامت 🍏
@Dr_SalamatX · 166,188
#4
فرصت زندگی
@forsatzdndegi · 190
#5
بازنشستگان تامین اجتماعی
@ertebat_ba_adminhaa2 · 6,888
#6
داستان کوتاه
@dastan_kootah · 34,837
#7
تاناتوس
@Clinicalpsychology2017 · 6,964
#8
اطلاع رسانی انديشه نوين
@DrAzartash1 · 1,084
#9
🥇آکادمی ارشد و دکتری آمار
@arshadamar20 · 1,208
#10
دکتر سارا ناصرزاده
@Dr_zana6oei · 48,975
#11
Free BOOK | کتاب رایگان
@FreeBOOK_Com · 48,664
#12
معاونت فرهنگی دانشجویی موسسه آ.ع ارشاد دماوند
@FarhangiEDU · 1,215
#13
شوق زندگی/اعظم عباسیان
@shogh_e_zendegi · 1,766
#14
Sepasnik
@sepasnik · 93
#15
مسجد امام حسین(ابربکوه های مقیم مرکز)@masgedemamhoseinabrbakoh
@masgedemamhoseinabrbakoh · 581
#16
همشهری نیوز احمدآباد مستوفی
@hamshahrinewz676 · 826
#17
آموزش ترکی استانبولی 🇹🇷
@turkishsaira · 851
#18
(ELibrary) کتابخانه عمومی الکترونیکی
@EPublicLibrary · 366 (as read 15 September 2026)
#19
اخبار فریدنیها
@Fereydannews1 · 553
#20
طب سنتى صالح
@sonatitebir · 3,721
#21
🎶soltan seda omid🎶
@soltansedaomid · 842
#22
Ayeneh
@ayeneh_ravan · 463 (as read 15 September 2026)
#23
خانه هنرمندان
@HomeStars · 30,096
#24
اصلاح طلبان پرس
@eslahtalaban_press · 590
#25
داستانک
@dastanakema · 2,594
#26
شمشك ازقديم تابه امروز❄️❄️❄️
@shemshakghadim · 2,269
#27
الکلی های گمنام(گروه آنلاین عصر مشهد)
@asremashhadaa2 · 955
#28
دانشجویان نرم افزار_دانشگاه شهید صدوقی
@software_sadooghi · 152
#29
Ronesanss iran
@ronesanss_iran · 3,344
#30
روستای جزمه
@jazmeh · 599
#31
اتحاد شمیران
@EtehadShamiran · 1,082
#32
راشا | انجمن علمی زبان روسی دانشگاه گیلان
@anjomanelmirusi_gilan · 401
#33
«ساقی‌نامه»
@saghinameh23 · 1,213 (as read 15 September 2026)
#34
Iranian Concerts and Tv Show Music
@Tv_Show_Music_and_Concert · 1,810
#35
دبیرستان امام صادق (ع)
@imam_sadeq_nmonedolati · 239
#36
کانال اعضای نظام مهندسی معدن خراسان جنوبی
@Sk_eng_mining_group · 1,326 (as read 15 September 2026)
#37
سید پرویز فتاح
@ParvizFatah_ir · 755
#38
گروه خدمات مالی نهایت‌نگر
@NahayatNegar_Analysis · 8,351
#39
امور سینمایی استان اصفهان
@cinemaisf · 5,518
#40
زبان فرانسه از پایه با زینا (le français avec zina)
@apprendrefrzina · 24,678
#41
کانال اخبار ولدان
@veldan · 1,409
#42
⚜️تجارت هماهنگ⚜️
@boursiran879 · 2,771
#43
💎مجتمع فنى تهران نمايندگى ونك💎
@mftvanak · 1,360
#44
نـــواى طـــهـــران
@navaatehran · 3,274
#45
مجمع البحرین
@magmaulbahrin · 1,846
#46
تــــبـــریـــز (خبر صبح)
@tabrriz · 17,110
#47
EhsAnTrades Public Channel
@EhsAnTrades · 957
#48
حرف حساب
@totalksense7 · 1,923
#49
اطلاع رسانی کارشناسی ارشد دانشگاه ارشاد
@ershaddamavand · 1,513
#50
خدمات مالی و ارزی قشم
@qeshme_exchange · 1,741
#51
کانال وطن سبلان ابربکوه
@vatansabalanabrbekooh · 542
#52
Valuable Airdrops درآمد دلاری
@ValuableAiirdrops · 62
#53
IAGON News & Announcements
@iagonofficial · 573
#54
Inter Miami CF
@intermiamicf · 1,080
#55
درد دل
@Tahrim_News · 2,461
#56
KOUROSH (هوش مصنوعی)
@robosig · 327 (as read 15 September 2026)
#57
Beckham Fans
@Beckham7 · 508
#58
ElissaZkh | الیسا
@elissa_iran · 2,643
#59
Graphiran.com کانال رسمی
@graphiran · 2,760
#60
گنجِ حضور تصویری
@GanjeHozourTasviri · 7,054
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 15 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

داستان کوتاه
@dastan_kootah · 34,837
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
دکتر سارا ناصرزاده
@Dr_zana6oei · 48,975
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
🍎 رسانه دکتر سلامت 🍏
@Dr_SalamatX · 166,188
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
کافه روانشناسی
@caferavanshenasi · 40,659
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 August 2026
💞👈متنــآه‍نگ👉💞
@Matn_ahang_channel · 25,421
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 September 2026
Free BOOK | کتاب رایگان
@FreeBOOK_Com · 48,664
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 August 2026
فقط آهنگ ترکی
@damlabot · 31,762
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
جملات هشت ریشتری
@Hashtrishterii · 75,718
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“دكتر آذرتاش” (@drazartash), 24,739 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drazartash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.