Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Don't spill the wine

Channel

Don't spill the wine

@dontspillthewine

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,715subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001395420034
TypeChannel
Username@dontspillthewine
Created30 May 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dontspillthewine

Growth

1,7141,7161,7156 August 2026 — 1,716 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,716 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,714 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,715 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,714–1,716 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:451,715+1
9 Aug 2026, 12:351,714-2
6 Aug 2026, 07:061,716no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:181,716first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 18 November 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 1,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
214
1 post measured
Reaction rate
2.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held21 (18 November 20256 August 2026)
Views total214
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

381 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11129.1%
👍10828.3%
🔥5815.2%
🍾246.30%
🕊153.94%
👏133.41%
92.36%
💯82.10%
😢71.84%
🤔61.57%
🤣41.05%
🤨41.05%
🎉30.787%
👎30.787%
🥰30.787%
🗿20.525%
🤬20.525%
😱10.262%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 381reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 November 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC214 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Morning Claret (Simon J Woolf) сообщает о какой-то бессмыслице, происходящей в Словении. По новому закону, даже вина без какого-либо защищенного географического происхождения обязаны будут проходить проверку дегустационной комиссии. Отказываются от принадлежности апелласьонам и прочим официальным географическим зонам, как известно, частенько производители "натурального" и прочего неклассического и неконвенционально

🤨4🗿2

16 Jun 2026, 19:30 UTC666 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Готовлюсь к своей дегустации Шампанского и слушаю интервью с Vincent Laval (Champagne Georges Laval). На вопрос, какое классное игристое не из Франции ему приходит на ум, он вспоминает, как пил замечательную биодинамическую Каву, и отмечает, что Кава может быть совершенно прекрасна, если хорошо сделана. Вот это отношение здорового человека и профессионала к Каве, а не закатывание глаз и забрасывание в утиль всей кате

🍾15🔥54🤣4

14 Jun 2026, 17:20 UTC674 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Майкл Фриджон тут обрушился с критикой на Тима Аткина. Мол, его South African Report ему и раньше не особо нравился, а теперь и подавно не будет, т.к. теперь винодельни должны будут платить, чтобы быть включенными в отчет. Нюанс заключается в том, что платить они будут не Аткину, а Wines of South Africa, и решение это исходит от WOSA, а не от Аткина. WOSA оплачивает перелёт, проживание и водителя для Аткина. Раньше о

👍12🔥6

20 May 2026, 11:22 UTC792 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

На фоне винного скандала в и вокруг Австрии отмечу 2 пункта. Напомню, вино Роланда Велиха получило 100 баллов от Саклинга, и вообще его Блауфрэнкиш признан по всему миру, а дома в Австрии не прошел дегустационную комиссию и теперь будет просто «австрийским вином» без апелласьона. Первое – бюрократия, очевидно, не затем существует, чтобы быть во главе винных трендов, поощрения индивидуальности и разнообразия. Поэтом

👍11🥰32

7 Apr 2026, 19:01 UTC997 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Ещё хорошая новость - John Szabo MS наконец перевыпустил свою знаменитую книгу про вулканические вина Volcanic Wines: Salt, Grit and Power в электронном формате (для kindle). Новость на самом деле приятная, так как мне, например, давно хотелось её почитать, но печатное издание перепродают почему-то за какие-то неадекватные деньги (на том же Амазоне сейчас можно купить за 3.300 долларов, например). Плохая новость в т

10👍2

7 Apr 2026, 06:52 UTC974 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Удивительно, но вчера я в первый раз попробовал Рислинг, который действительно пах бензином. Не вот этим фирменным шифером/сланцами/дымком, который встречается часто даже у молодых мозельских Рислингов, или чем-то ещё, что в дегустационных заметках очень уж хочется принять за бензин, а именно действительно бензином. Наконец-то. И да, как и положено, этот аромат никуда не ушел за пару часов, стал немного слабее, возмо

18👍11🔥4

19 Mar 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,040 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Альто Пьемонте в мае. Мы с Настей (@inmyglass) решили организовать винную поездку в наш любимый регион – Альто Пьемонте. Нас и вас ждут одни из лучших и знаковых виноделен региона, местная еда, альпийский воздух, море впечатлений и, разумеется, прямое общение с виноделами и винными единомышленниками. С 14 по 17 мая мы посетим 5 виноделен: Travaglini, Antoniolo, Colombera&Garella, Le Pianelle, Podere ai Valloni. Это

10🔥5

10 Mar 2026, 20:34 UTC≈1,000 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

К другим новостям - если будете на Prowein в этом году, заходите на стенд ITA - Italian Trade Agency (Hall F3 / G70). Я планирую в этом году впервые поучаствовать в выставке не как посетитель. Буду представлять Италию и наливать вина из спика Meininger TOP-100 Italy всем интересующимся. Здесь подробнее о винах (и заодно некоторых итальянских винных трендах). А здесь полная программа ITA на Провайн - будут интересные

🔥13👍102

7 Mar 2026, 14:13 UTC≈1,080 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда кто-то заявляет, что вся Кава - это плохое вино. @dontspillthewine

18👎2

7 Mar 2026, 14:12 UTC959 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот вроде бы мне нравится Том Гилби как винный коммуникатор – весело, не душно, доступно, и свой собственный стиль есть. И прекрасно справляется с тем, чтобы сорвать с вина некую мантию недоступности и элитарности. Но потом он берет и заявляет, что целая категория вин – помои (ну, вы знаете, как он обычно выражается, не стесняясь). В данном случае речь о Каве. Был у него выпуск с игристыми в ноябре, там он резко о К

👍14👏51👎1

27 Feb 2026, 09:32 UTC≈2,040 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Влияние заморозков наглядно. Слева гроздь, цветению которой помешали заморозки, справа - которой не помешали. Фото из инстаграма Dylan Grigg (instagram.com/gdylla). Когда будете в следующий раз читать про влияние погоды на урожай, вспомните это фото (хорошо бы подобных наглядных фото и так было больше в винных книгах, но спасибо винным специалистам, которые их размещают у себя). Чирз! @dontspillthewine

👍21💯82🤬2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @dontspillthewine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 228,186 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Don't spill the wine” (@dontspillthewine), 1,715 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dontspillthewine.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.