Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Доктор, что это? | ДЧЭ

@docwhatshow

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,901subscribers

+81 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001712826967
TypeChannel
Username@docwhatshow
Description«Доктор, что это?» — канал о медицине простым понятным языком Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://clck.ru/3GCnHt Вопросы врачам Миадок:@pharmiss_chat По вопросам рекламы и сотрудничества @doc_show_desk Купить telega.in/c/docwhatshow Подробнее дчэ.рф
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/docwhatshow

Growth

16,80916,90116,8556 August 2026 — 16,820 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,820 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,810 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,809 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,866 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,869 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,858 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,898 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,901 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net +81. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,795–16,915 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:5316,901+3
11 Aug 2026, 09:1216,898+40
10 Aug 2026, 12:0516,858-11
9 Aug 2026, 14:1416,869+3
8 Aug 2026, 12:3016,866+57
7 Aug 2026, 10:4716,809-1
6 Aug 2026, 14:2016,810-10
6 Aug 2026, 02:3016,820no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:2216,820first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.51%
avg views ÷ 16,901 subscribers
Avg views / post
255
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held71 (4 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total18,079
Reactions total761
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,000
Videos
471
Links
6,290

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 06s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

641 reactions across 59 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
21834.0%
👍17026.5%
🙏619.52%
🔥426.55%
😁335.15%
😱233.59%
🤣192.96%
132.03%
🤝121.87%
101.56%
👀81.25%
😨81.25%
🐳30.468%
🤔30.468%
👌20.312%
💊20.312%
💯20.312%
🤗20.312%
🤪20.312%
🍌10.156%
7 further kinds71.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 761reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

⁉️ Устал искать интересные каналы с медицинскими новостями? 📁 ДОБАВИТЬ ВСЕ КАНАЛЫ В этой папке собраны каналы про медицину, которые помогают быстрее разобраться в сфере, находить идеи и экономить время на поиске информации. 😏 ЗАБРАТЬ ПАПКУ МОЖНО ТУТ ⏰ Папка действует 72 часа. 🤩 Организаторы: Green.Papka

4

12 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC138 views12 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Синдром самозванца: почему даже успешный сотрудник считает себя недостаточно хорошим 😶 Человек получает повышение, закрывает сложный проект, слышит похвалу от руководителя — и всё равно думает: «Мне просто повезло». Знакомо? Это один из типичных признаков так называемого синдрома самозванца. 💼 При таком состоянии человек систематически недооценивает собственные компетенции и объясняет успех внешними обстоятельств

👍92🙏1

12 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC191 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

☀️ 12 августа - солнечное затмение. Смотреть на Солнце без защиты опасно 👁 Накануне солнечного затмения специалисты вновь предупреждают о риске солнечной ретинопатии повреждения сетчатки из-за интенсивного солнечного излучения. 🩺 Показательный случай произошёл с британцем Питером Смитом. В 1999 году он наблюдал за затмением через одолженную маску сварщика. На следующий день появились мерцание перед глазами и головн

👀82🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC195 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

💊 Хлорофилл и магний для похудения: работают ли популярные БАДы? 🌿 В соцсетях хлорофилл называют «эликсиром молодости» и средством для снижения веса. Однако научные данные гораздо скромнее: убедительных доказательств, что хлорофилл или его производное хлорофиллин помогают худеть, омолаживают организм или лечат заболевания, нет. 🥗 Пользу приносит не сам зелёный пигмент, а продукты, в которых он содержится. Листовые

9👍1🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC209 views11 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🤯 Компот из ревеня отправил женщину в кому на 41 день 🩺 В Подмосковье женщина приготовила компот из ревеня, используя растение как «народное средство» от простуды. В итоге она получила тяжелое отравление и провела более 40 дней в реанимации. 🌿 Опасность в данном случае связана не с самим стеблем ревеня, который используют в пищу, а прежде всего с его листьями. Они содержат значительное количество щавелевой кислоты

🙏91😱1

12 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC233 views14 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❗️ Приёмные отделения российских больниц переводят на систему триажа 🏥 В российских стационарах меняется привычная логика работы приёмного отделения: пациента должны оценивать не по принципу «кто пришёл раньше», а по тяжести состояния и срочности медицинской помощи. 🚑 Это называется триаж медицинская сортировка пациентов. Такой подход используется в неотложной медицине по всему миру и позволяет в первую очередь зан

11👍2🔥1

12 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC224 views15 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

❤ Доброго утра! Шутка юмора, ведь смех продлевает жизнь! ☀️ Канал ДЧЭ l ❓Вопросы врачам

😁12🐳1🤗1🤣1

11 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC279 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🧠 Прокрастинация не всегда лень: иногда мозг просто работает на пределе ⏳ «Потом сделаю» знакомая фраза, которая легко превращается в образ жизни. Но постоянное откладывание дел, проблемы с концентрацией и ощущение, что сил нет даже на простые задачи, не всегда говорят о плохой дисциплине. 😵‍💫 Хронический стресс действительно способен ухудшать концентрацию, планирование, принятие решений и контроль эмоций. Поэтому

12🔥3👍1

11 Aug 2026, 16:14 UTC254 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 👀🌷 🍧лайф каналы студентов медиков 🧠каналы врачей 💡полезная информация , статьи 🧑‍💻учёба в медицинских вузах Добавить папку Всё самое интересное о медицине теперь в одном месте на вашем экране. Успейте добавить, пока ссылка активна: ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ https://t.me/addlist/Fw0d02TU9ts1ZjJi ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ Ведёте канал и хотите поучаствовать в следующей папке? - пишите @kubik2566 🧢

5

11 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC252 views16 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🧬 Ожирение действительно связано с ускоренным биологическим старением 🩺 Лишний вес это не только вопрос внешности или цифры на весах. Избыток жировой ткани способен поддерживать хроническое воспаление, нарушать обмен веществ и создавать условия, при которых клеточные процессы старения идут активнее. 🔬 Исследователи из Западно-китайской больницы Сычуаньского университета проанализировали данные предыдущих работ и о

12👍2🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @docwhatshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 180,818 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Доктор, что это? | ДЧЭ” (@docwhatshow), 16,901 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/docwhatshow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.