Channel
@dnyxw192
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31,964subscribers
-631 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003554978338 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dnyxw192 |
| Description | 🌍 东南亚头条 曝光 · 新闻-黑料 🔍 事件新闻爆料： @dnyxw192 🔍 东南亚大事件曝光: @dnyxw191 🔍缅甸『今日头条』： @dnyxw193 🔍越南泰国新闻曝光: @mlxy1218 🔍柬埔寨头条曝光： @hjklnf778 🔍马来西亚新闻曝光: @hongyunlin1 🔍『西港黑料』曝光: @ukevjiv6 🔍缅北大事件曝光： @facaiqq686868 🔍网红 ❤️主播 : @cosfeng3 💁📲商务合作： @wwish996 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dnyxw192 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @dnyxw192/3991 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 07:15 UTC | @dnyxw193/62907 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dnyxw193/62987 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC | @dnyxw192/3999 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 08:43 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dnyxw193/63017 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC | @dnyxw192/4002 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dnyxw193/63037 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC | @dnyxw192/4004 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dnyxw193/63087 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC | @dnyxw192/4009 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @dnyxw193/63097 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC | @dnyxw192/4010 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @dnyxw193 | 10 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @dnyxw193 (6–4) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 15 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @dnyxw192 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 31,964 | -90 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 32,054 | -121 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:22 | 32,175 | -119 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 32,294 | -107 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 32,401 | -71 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:20 | 32,472 | -123 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 32,595 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 32,595 | first reading |
139 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 139 (7 August 2026 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 51,207 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 02:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❗️【诈骗团伙“中国大脑”藏身芭堤雅豪宅，泰国警方破门擒获！涉案880万泰铢】❗️ 8月14日，泰国犯罪打击局联合移民警察，突袭了春武里府邦拉蒙县的一处高层公寓，目标直指一名30岁的中国男子——张瑞。他可不是普通游客，而是被中国警方通缉的诈骗洗钱主谋，罪名包括欺诈、非法转移赃款及逾期居留。 调查显示，2023年至2024年间，他以泰国为行动基地，远程指挥团伙成员，利用几十张个人银行账户接收诈骗所得，再指使下属大量取现，将赃款“洗白”成现金。仅被查实的损失就超过180万元人民币，约合880万泰铢。 当得知中国当局即将签发逮捕令时，张某先逃往日本，后又非法潜入泰国，自2025年3月起藏身于此，泰国刑事侦查局通过跨国犯罪打击中心和网络反诈骗中心的线索追踪，锁定了他的藏匿点。 审讯中，张某供认不讳——他承认自己是洗钱计划的幕后指挥，负责招募、派单和资金分配。目前，他已被移交移民局，等待遣返回中国接受法律制裁。 🖋广告合作：👤山…
❗️【一中国男子在波贝被扣押】❗️ 昨天，卜迭棉芷省警方对波贝市3处涉嫌电诈的可疑窝点展开突击搜查。 行动中，执法人员在第3处地点抓获1名签证逾期3个月的中国籍男子，并当场查获手机、无线对讲机、吸Du工具、一枚9毫米子弹及枪套等证物。 目前，该中国籍嫌犯已被移交波贝市警局接受进一步依法审理。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
大事件新闻爆料 pinned a video
💩#频道互推 🔗 📢 新闻头条事件 📢 今日曝光 📢 内涵段子 📢 求职甩人招聘 📢 亚太新闻 ------------------------------ 📢 视野全网曝光台 📢 迪拜大事件曝光 📢 东南亚大事件 📢 菲律宾大事件 📢 柬埔寨大事件 📢 华人大事件 📢 安危大事件 ------------------------------ 📢 每の吃瓜搞笑视频 📢 东南亚新闻曝光 📢 中文头条新闻曝光 📢 91网红主播鉴黄 📢 麻豆国产电影 📢 动漫里番韩国女优 📢 91吃瓜反差新闻 📢 91黑料吃瓜 ------------------------------ 📢 东南亚新闻网 📢 柬埔寨新闻大事件 📢 菲律宾大事件 📢 [每日快报]华人新闻 📢 迪拜新闻 📢 骗子曝光 📢 亚太缅甸新闻 📢 泰国新闻 ------------------------------ 📢 吃瓜搞笑猎奇新闻 📢 西港日记📔柬埔寨新闻中心 📢 素…
❗️【太子集团关键人物陈星曝光，旗下傲胜国际曾投资刘德华电影】❗️ 近日，OCCRP与《海峡时报》联合调查确认，美国起诉书中代号“第二同谋者”的人物为陈星。调查显示，陈星曾担任太子集团旗下傲胜环球投资集团董事长，并在多个国家和地区拥有复杂的公司及资产网络。 与此同时，他关联的傲世娱乐文创还曾参与投资刘德华、刘青云主演的电影《拆弹专家2》。 美国检方指控他是太子集团的“打手”，负责通过腐败交易和其他手段，帮助集团应对警方调查。 该调查称，这名关键角色名叫陈星，1986年出生于上海。他在2017年底获得柬埔寨国籍后，改名为陈索利（Chen Sokly）。 2017年，陈志在柬埔寨成立傲胜国际（Awesome）投资集团，2018年，陈星担任傲胜国际董事长，并在新加坡、美国、香港开设多家“傲胜”系公司。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【德国组织MJEN报告指三佛塔地区存在诈骗与强迫劳动场所】❗️ 泰缅边境克伦邦三佛塔（Payathonzu）地区存在涉嫌网络诈骗、人口贩运及强迫劳动的场所。报告利用卫星影像与实地记录，标注了多个可疑院落位置，指出这些场所设有围墙与安保措施，限制人员自由出入。 MJEN建议欧盟及邻国加强边境通信管控，并为当地人权组织提供支持。目前相关说法尚未获独立核实。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【网友提醒：要办护照出国的狗推的抓紧办吧】❗️ 都没等到9.15号，我现在预约办护照，都只能在户籍地办理了，原来是全国都支持去办的。 我估计是高危地区已经当作试点开始提前测试实行政策了。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【“中国神棍党”横行沙巴东西海岸！12人落网，涉案金额至少60万令吉】❗️ 马来西亚沙巴近日破获一起涉嫌以“驱邪改运”“算命治病”为幌子的诈骗案，一个被称为“中国神棍党”的团伙涉嫌在亚庇、兵南邦及山打根等地活动，至少涉及5至6宗案件，累计损失金额超过60万令吉。 据了解，嫌犯通常以草药治病、驱邪改运等借口接近受害者，再将其介绍给所谓的“算命大师”。随后以施咒、祭拜等名义，诱骗受害者交出现金及金饰。 在得手后，嫌犯会趁机将贵重财物调包成杂物，并要求受害者暂时不要打开袋子，以争取时间逃离现场。 警方目前已逮捕12人，包括10名女性和2名男性，其中至少7人为中国籍女子。警方同时起获5辆汽车、13部手机、7本护照，以及总额约2万令吉的多国现金。 落网嫌犯目前已被依法延扣，警方将进一步调查，并根据诈骗相关法律展开提控。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【网友感慨：西港的唐人街一片寂靜】❗️ 柬埔寨民众抱怨失业问题，由于人口稀少，许多商店已经关闭。如今，这里仿佛变成了一片荒凉的田野。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【网友分享：公司园区搬到斯里兰卡后，一切东西都从简了，塑胶凳、简易桌，一个月下来业绩不降反而还升了】❗️ 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【等待遣返的推子们，老家来人看你们了】❗️ 今天上午，中国公安部刑事侦查局局长姜国利一行前往茶胶省巴地遣返准备中心，实地考察了该中心，核查涉案人员遣返前的人道羁押条件及法律程序。 柬埔寨移民总局调查与程序执行局局长尤萨伦接待了姜国利一行，双方高度评价两国在打击跨国网赌电诈中的密切合作。姜国利对柬方的高效协助表示感谢。 有啥委屈，找姜局长投诉～～ 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
❗️【妙瓦底偏远山区：索奇督父子新建诈骗园区】❗️ 克伦邦妙瓦底县水沟谷镇附近，BGF/KNA领导人梭奇督上校及其两子正于偏远的梅朗普山脚密林内大规模兴建诈骗园区。部分建筑已完工，并已开始转移中国公民入驻，现场由武装人员负责安保。 此前，梭奇督父子曾在旧水沟谷镇运营诈骗业务，军方控制部分区域后，他们转至村庄继续经营。此次新址位于人迹罕至的深山中，出入通道包括山路及泰国侧边境。 美国政府已制裁梭奇督父子三人，涉及跨境犯罪、人口贩运和网络诈骗。去年军方突袭后，克伦武装组织迅速另建新址。此外，当地其他武装势力也在妙瓦底周边多处新建诈骗园区并投入运营。 🖋广告合作：👤山野藏秋
Showing the 12 most recent of 139 posts we hold for @dnyxw192. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 86,538 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 50 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大事件新闻爆料” (@dnyxw192), 31,964 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dnyxw192.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.