Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дмитрий Мельников

Channel

Дмитрий Мельников

@dmelnikoff7691

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,195subscribers

-85 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002047045474
TypeChannel
Username@dmelnikoff7691
DescriptionПоблагодарить поэта за труд 2200701820876883 Дмитрий Петрович Г.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/dmelnikoff7691

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@dmelnikoff7691/2045 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC@grishkafilippov/357702 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC1.0034 hours
@dmelnikoff7691/2046 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC@grishkafilippov/357712 Nov 2026, 17:07 UTC1.0034 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@grishkafilippov5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0034 hoursthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 44 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

7,1667,2807,2235 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,280 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,273 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,265 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,256 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,246 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,235 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,221 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,212 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,206 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,202 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,192 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,226 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,198 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,194 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,181 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,166 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,181 subscribers14 October 2026 — 7,193 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,196 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,188 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,200 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,203 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,207 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,208 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,204 subscribers8 November 2026 — 7,197 subscribers12 November 2026 — 7,195 subscribers7,1955 August 202612 November 2026
28 measurements spanning 99 days, net -85. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,149–7,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 14:117,195-2
8 Nov 2026, 17:417,197-7
5 Nov 2026, 10:487,204-4
2 Nov 2026, 13:067,208+1
30 Oct 2026, 06:477,207+4
27 Oct 2026, 08:287,203+3
24 Oct 2026, 10:067,200+12
20 Oct 2026, 23:317,188-8
18 Oct 2026, 00:207,196+3
14 Oct 2026, 18:317,193+12
11 Oct 2026, 16:177,181+15
5 Oct 2026, 12:167,166-15
27 Sept 2026, 03:217,181-13
18 Sept 2026, 01:367,194-4
13 Sept 2026, 12:587,198-28
9 Sept 2026, 19:007,226+34
4 Sept 2026, 21:597,192-10
1 Sept 2026, 12:087,202-4
29 Aug 2026, 10:027,206-6
26 Aug 2026, 18:127,212first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.6%
avg views ÷ 7,195 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,290
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held55 (29 June 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total137,611
Reactions total4,815
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 00:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
240
Videos
54
Links
236

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 57s
Average length
3m 57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,949 reactions across 55 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4,48245.0%
🙏1,50815.2%
💯9169.21%
🔥6977.01%
💔6886.92%
👍6326.35%
❤‍🔥4434.45%
😢2002.01%
👎1011.02%
🥰640.643%
😭520.523%
👏450.452%
🤗340.342%
🤬300.302%
😍200.201%
🤔200.201%
⚡50.05%
🤷‍♂50.05%
🤷‍♀40.04%
🤯30.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,949 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
23
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 55 we hold a reading for · 33%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dmelnikoff7691. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 12 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (46.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 07:31 UTC871 views206 reactions3 Starsread 15 November 2026

Весь этот шум и блеск притворный на деле - гиблые ростки тщеславья, злобы и упорной, неутешительной тоски. Все эти липовые липы, все эти лучшие друзья, "Не спорь, старик, ты тоже глыба, ты точно гений, как и я!", вся эта разлюли-малина, все эти фокусы с лицом есть лишь подобье карантина; на посошок перед концом нацедят и отправят в топку, и позабудут навсегда. Зато я видел, как сорока смотрелась в зеркало пруда, как …

❤147❤‍🔥28👍17💔7🔥7

8 Nov 2026, 06:58 UTC≈1,770 views257 reactionsread 15 November 2026

Мышь в отсутствие кошки (та спала на террасе) оборзела настолько, что стала играть под столом на кухне крышечкой от капель для носа. Лежу я такой ночью, разные высокие мысли думаю, про звезды и как бы мне новый ремень к старым штанам купить, а мышь крышку гоняет. Встал, принес с террасы кошку, положил на стул. Тишина, только часы тикают. Заснул. Через час проснулся от грохота: в углу за шкафом кошка ловила мышь. Что …

❤162🔥53🤗26👍14🥰2

7 Nov 2026, 10:03 UTC≈1,700 views150 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня отправили книги матери восьмерых детей. Один сын у нее воюет, а другой погиб. И она еще не знает, что в "Третьем Риме" есть стихи про нее. И про ее сына. Сыновей. Такая вот история. Что касается книг, то "Белее снега" и "Третий Рим" еще есть. Обращайтесь по поводу покупки этих книг или сюда в личные сообщения или в MAX по телефону +7 985 958-24-25 А то в последнее время о них как-то все подзабыли. Поэтому …

❤124🔥16💔9😢1

6 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC≈1,780 views231 reactionsread 15 November 2026

В солдатских сапогах священник, взойдя на кафедру, сказал, что каждый в этом мире пленник, я тоже слушал и молчал. А перед ним на табуретах стояли разные гробы, и души пленников отпетых, освободившись от судьбы, как бабочки, перелетали туда, к огням береговым, и свечки на помин сгорали и превращались в сизый дым. За домом дом, за сотней сотня - исчезли, слившись с темнотой лишь храм горел в руке Господней, как будто …

❤148🙏52💔26❤‍🔥3👍2

4 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈2,070 views64 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Шпаликов и последняя Надежда https://boosty.to/dmelnikoff

❤46💔18

4 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈2,420 views299 reactionsread 15 November 2026

❤️ Сегодня, в День народного единства. Стихотворение о том, что всех нас действительно объединяет. Есть край один на плоскости случайной, как будто бы холодный и печальный, все то же небо серое над ним, все так же стелется по ветру дым из труб печных, - здесь топят даже летом, и женщина, встающая со светом, гремит в колодце цинковым ведром, цепь лязгает, ведро стучит о стенки, и мальчик прожигает на коленке газету л…

❤220🙏42🔥19❤‍🔥5💯5👏4💔4

3 Nov 2026, 19:00 UTC≈1,660 views39 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Письма в никуда. Батарейки https://boosty.to/dmelnikoff

❤26🔥5🙏4👍3💯1

2 Nov 2026, 13:52 UTC≈2,040 views49 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

Письма в никуда. Зеленые шары https://boosty.to/dmelnikoff

❤49

1 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC≈6,050 views284 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

* * * Я голову поднял, и в первый раз не в оптику увидел этот город, который стал чистилищем для нас. Вон до того бетонного забора мы шли, как оказалось, целый год. До тех руин, что вижу через поле мы столько шли, что потеряли счет пролитым декалитрам крови. Но этот, бывший некогда поселком, шахтерский город мы вернем домой. А кто погиб, штурмуя лесополки, они бессмертны. И всегда со мной. 28 июня 2025 года * * * В…

🙏126❤88💔48❤‍🔥14😢6👏1🔥1

1 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC≈3,420 views159 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

нет, я не знаю, как она зовется, я чувствую смертельную усталость и сам не видел, но другим являлась. Одна звезда в четырнадцать лучей, волшебная, как первое свиданье, сияла им во глубине ночей и исполняла каждое желанье. Рассвет над промкой теплится едва, никак моя не кончится простуда, пусть каждый скажет главные слова и пусть они исполнятся как чудо. Я верю в то, что смерть не навсегда и что воскреснут павшие геро…

🙏72❤52💔25❤‍🔥5😢3👏2

1 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC≈3,460 views165 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

Я потерял эту подборку, а сегодня нашел случайно. Пусть висит здесь. СВО. Избранные стихотворения На той войне, на той войне часы ты видел на стене, все умерли, они ходили, одни в разрушенной квартире они ходили, как могли, вот здесь, на краешке земли, они смотрелись, как осколок уюта, тишины, тепла, напротив, со ступенек школы, шатаясь, женщина сошла. Какой-то дед из серой мглы тебе кричал: "Не уходите!", еще ты …

❤96🙏33❤‍🔥23💔10👏1🔥1😢1

1 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC≈3,230 views151 reactions1 Starread 15 November 2026

присяге – мы стоим на берегу, где лань со львом и Бог с учениками, и бродят в поле тучные стада, и дети, что играют рядом с нами, не умирают больше никогда. 7 сентября 2022 года * * * Одна другой говорит: "Не реви. Они герои войны. Поставят в Донецке Спас-на-крови на средства со всей страны. И будут их имена сиять на мраморе навсегда. Давай товар раскладывай, мать. Масло поставь сюда. Твой-то был завидный жених. …

❤‍🔥69🙏43❤26💔7😢3👏2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @dmelnikoff7691. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @dmelnikoff7691 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 07:27 UTCAnonymous Poll396 voters

Опрос. Имена скольких любимых героев современной русской прозы (постсоветский период) вы можете назвать по памяти?

  1. Ни одного45%
  2. Одного11%
  3. Двух-трех36%
  4. Помню целую галерею новых живых образов9%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 21 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анна Долгарева | Стихи
@dolgareva · 19,599
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
Дмитрий Конаныхин 🇷🇺
@grishkafilippov · 35,769
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дмитрий Мельников” (@dmelnikoff7691), 7,195 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dmelnikoff7691.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.