Channel
@devilonpointshoes
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21,527subscribers
-45 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001449825645 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @devilonpointshoes |
| Description | Номер заявления 4953562688 https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=678662786aa9672b96ad5973®istryType=bloggersPermission #E956K По вопросам рекламы: Виктория @niclusha |
| Created | 12 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/devilonpointshoes |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 21,527 | -8 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 21,535 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 21,537 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 21,542 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 21,541 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 21,551 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 21,562 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:54 | 21,566 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 21,570 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 21,572 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (1 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 89,710 |
| Reactions total | 1,103 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Aug 2026, 04:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,103 reactions across 11 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 533 | 48.3% | |
| 😁 | 220 | 19.9% | |
| 😱 | 129 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 63 | 5.71% | |
| 😢 | 48 | 4.35% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 4.08% | |
| 🔥 | 37 | 3.35% | |
| 🍾 | 17 | 1.54% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 0.725% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.181% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.091% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как выглядит сон при температуре 39!) Украинцы на фоне занавеса Мариинского театра танцуют репертуар Дягелевских Сезонов балетов Аля Рус в Калифорнии. Где товарищ Ратманский? Или это яркое проявление двойных стандартов в действии?)
😁49😱11❤8🍾1👍1
Оглядываясь на прошедший сезон в Мариинском театре невозможно не отметить первого солиста Минчхоля Чона. Наткнулась на его исполнение вариации из Лакоттовского "Марко Спада" и потеряла дар речи. 8е чудо света, или совершенно уникальное, ни на кого не похожее дарование. Способность останавливать время, исключительная музыкальность, словно врожденный аристократизм, интеллигентность, уважение к хореографическому тексту,…
❤192👍42👏30😁3🕊1
А кто-нибудь может мне объяснить какого фака где-то в Штатах, на каком-то Гала, на заднике занавес Мариинского Театра????
😁60😱37❤15💯8
Уже несколько лет я абсолютный фанат компании WAU и всех ее бьюти гаджетов. Без их MAMI я не уезжаю никуда. Их фен заменяет поход в салон на укладку. Сегодня я вас познакомлю с моим новым любимчиком- ATAMA. Я много раз говорила, что когда Там раздавали дары, я пропустила свою очередь за копной волос, зато оторвала с лихвой чувства юмора, самоиронии, ну и пластичное тело🤪. Дурости мне тоже отсыпали достаточно, потому…
❤16😁5🔥2🍾1😈1
А вы видели Бога в Юноше и Смерти? Я тут пересматривала и это невероятное по харизме, наполненности и исполнение. Тут Фарух с Таней Амосовой, царствие ей небесное. Даже через экран телефона мурашки пробивают.
❤79😢15🔥6😁3
Я все по поводу Ридж) Я понимаю, что, видимо, их худрук очень хороший предприниматель и наверняка много хорошего сделал для театра. Но быть хорошим бизнесменом и быть хорошим хореографом- две разные вещи. Очень жаль, что я не успела на третий акт с Ирой Сапожниковой, хотела сходить. Но и Лада была очень хороша, надо признать. Вообще к артистам то у меня вопросов нет. Они все огромные молодцы эту по****нь танцевать. Н…
❤39😱10😁3
Ну и любимая всеми рубрика с моей озвучкой). Хочу отдельно написать про артистов- ребят, вы прекрасны. К вам нет вопросов вообще. Вы умнички! У меня вопросы исключительно к постановке. Я бы хотела посмотреть как хореограф ваш ставил вам хип хоп) лично показывал?))
😁72👏22❤18🔥4🍾2
У менЯ давно не было такого отвращения, что хотелось уйти посреди действа. Я не позволяю себе такое исключительно из уважения к артистам. Ну не может человек ставить, не обладает даром хореографа. Все на что он способен это плагиат. Напоминаю у кого украл 1001 ночь И кстати, здесь использовал тот же трюк с движущимися декорациями, которые придумала ему когда то Назирова. Все начало, темные тона и тд- чистый Дуато. То…
❤61🍾7👍1😁1
Я в шоке.. я не понимаю- я на Бале вампиров или на бакинской вечеринке с узбекскими мотивами или на спектакле Богомолова или просто на концерте BTS. Это худший Ромео и Джульетта в моей жизни. Очень жалко артистов, которым это приходится танцевать. Жалко Прокофьева и Лавровского… Позор.
😱67❤9😁4😢2👍1
Захотелось мне вчера сказки. Схожу ка я думаю на Щелкунчик Приморской сцены. Хоть от музыки получу удовольствие. Сказать, что я в ахуе шоке- это ничего не сказать. Как можно было так купировать великую Музыку. И все так куце купировано. Про либретто и хореографию я молчу. Это просто пиздиссимо. И никакой мой гималайский дзен и розовые слоники это не спасли. Спасла Лиличка. Но сама по себе вариация дикий закос под Гри…
😢31❤27😁18🍾5😱4😈1
Сходили мы тут на моих любимых Якобсоцев и их Пиковую Даму. Обожаю этот спектакль. Несмотря на конец сезона и невероятный перфоманс в «кардио» стиле от Славы, ребята в отлично форме. Огромные молодцы👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 Обожаю образ «старухи».
❤69🔥25👏11😁2🍾1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @devilonpointshoes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,302,571 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дьявол на пуантах” (@devilonpointshoes), 21,527 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/devilonpointshoes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.