Channel
@KatyaN_bolshoi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,989subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001752003053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KatyaN_bolshoi |
| Created | 12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KatyaN_bolshoi |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:42 | 1,989 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 1,993 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:05 | 1,994 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 1,996 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:26 | 1,997 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 1,998 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 00:11 | 1,999 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 2,001 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 2,002 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 2,004 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:22 | 2,004 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
52 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 44.2% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 36.5% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 5.77% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 3.85% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 1.92% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 1.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Маленький , но такой симпатичный очерк Мандельштама «я пишу сценарий» для журнала «Советский экран» ( 1927) Осип Мандельштам. Я пишу сценарий Шкловский посоветовал мне написать сценарий и скрылся, мелькнув огуречной головой. Больше я его не видел, но получилось вот что: я проклял Шкловского до седьмого колена. Я решил написать из быта пожарных. Мне сразу померещился великолепный кадр во вкусе Эйзенштейна: расп…
👍2🔥1🤣1
Удивительный макет этой полосы газеты «Известия» заставляет задуматься, почему в материале наверху трудоустройство детей подозрительно , а внизу вообще не вызывает вопросов )). Плюрализм . Изумительная страница. А я вот помню, что на коллоквиуме при поступлении в театральный институт был вопрос об актерских династиях . Теперь не могу понять, смогут ли они сохраниться в условиях новых рекомендаций . В Большом тоже бы…
👍2🤔2🤣2👏1🤷♂1
The sun is shining
❤12👍1🤩1😍1
Это я тоже думаю о том, что все бывает только один раз за жизнь. Вообще «Мрамор» перечитать неплохо .
❤3
Бродский. «Мрамор»:/…/ Публий. Я, Туллий, понимаешь, совершенно случайно. Я не хотел. Пирожное было так неожиданно. Поэтому я и не мог его хотеть. Я как раз хотел оставить. Вернее, уже потом, когда съел, захотел. Это же было так внезапно! Сколько сижу, сроду пирожных не видел. Туллий. И уже не увидишь. Этого, по крайней мере. Публий. Да? Почему? Туллий. Читай инструкцию. ([Швыряет книгу н…
https://pushkinmuseum.art/php/diamond_vehicle/glossaire.php
❤3
Наверное , имеет смысл начать со слов « алмазная колесница»:) Ваджраяна (с санскр. «Алмазная колесница») Ответвление махаяны (с санскр. «Большая колесница»), возникшее около V–VII века и получившее окончательное оформление на территории Тибета. Большую роль в ваджраяне играют тантрические практики, которые могут помочь достичь просветления в рамках одной человеческой жизни (алмаз-ваджра символизирует это стремительно…
👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4
Photo, posted without a caption
❤4
В Пушкинсом музее открылась выставка « Алмазная колесница». Я, конечно , читала Гессе и почти все книги нынешнего Далай-Ламы , и какие-то введения в буддизм и ещё один учебный год жила в Японии, но про эту религию я знаю очень мало. Поэтому считаю, что мне повезло присоединиться к группе Ирины Антроповой, которая сама не будучи специалистом в этой области , смогла так живо, ярко, профессионально и азартно представить…
👍6❤1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @KatyaN_bolshoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KatyaN_culture” (@KatyaN_bolshoi), 1,989 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KatyaN_bolshoi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.