https://www.youtube.com/live/KgiRbPQHg70?si=KeIELAB3SmW6ZrPP

Channel
DAMS OFFICIAL
@damsdelhiofficial
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,201subscribers
+999 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001864247767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @damsdelhiofficial |
| Description | Official channel to share updates regarding NEETPG NEXT FMGE and tips & strategy. Subscribe to the channel to get daily quizzes and updates. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/damsdelhiofficial |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:07 | 59,201 | -10 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:49 | 59,211 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:17 | 59,213 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 01:49 | 59,211 | -32 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 59,243 | -16 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 00:31 | 59,259 | -20 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:40 | 59,279 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:06 | 59,286 | -9 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 00:40 | 59,295 | -2 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 59,297 | -16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:00 | 59,313 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 01:19 | 59,331 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:08 | 59,340 | -16 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:27 | 59,356 | +4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 59,352 | -8 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:57 | 59,360 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:17 | 59,361 | +4 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 59,357 | +31 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:54 | 59,326 | +30 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 03:37 | 59,296 | first reading |
Engagement
2,494 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.98%
- avg views ÷ 59,201 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 580
- 899 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.137%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 904
- of 2,494 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 182 of 899 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,494 (7 August 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 521,736 |
| Reactions total | 153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 23:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈11,600
- Videos
- ≈1,040
- Links
- ≈4,720
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 2m 18s
- Average length
- 46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
162 reactions across 117 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 138 | 85.2% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 3.09% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 2.47% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 1.85% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.23% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.617% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 203 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 162 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 36 of 904 posts held from the last 30 days (3.98%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
34F with ptosis and diplopia that worsen by evening. Most specific investigation?
- A. Ice-pack test14%
- B. Serum creatine kinase7%
- C. Nerve conduction velocity21%
- D. Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
9M is hyperactive, impulsive and inattentive at home and school for 1 yr. First-line drug?
- A. Methylphenidate65%
- B. Haloperidol15%
- C. Fluoxetine16%
- D. Lithium4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
28F with optic neuritis. MRI brain FLAIR shows ovoid periventricular lesions perpendicular to the lateral ventricles. Sign and Dx?
- A. Hot cross bun – MSA10%
- B. Hummingbird sign – PSP13%
- C. Dawson fingers – multiple sclerosis69%
- D. Eye of the tiger – PKAN7%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Agent of choice for inhalational induction in a 4-yr-old child?
- A. Desflurane8%
- B. Sevoflurane78%
- C. Isoflurane10%
- D. Nitrous oxide alone4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
26F with thin grey-white vaginal discharge and fishy odour; vaginal pH 5.0. Which finding on wet mount confirms the likely Dx?
- A. Pseudohyphae8%
- B. Motile flagellated organisms40%
- C. Koilocytes3%
- D. Clue cells49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under NIDDCP, what is the minimum iodine content of iodised salt at the consumer level?
- A. 30 ppm20%
- B. 10 ppm21%
- C. 15 ppm57%
- D. 50 ppm2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
9M with long-standing CSOM has a tender swelling in the upper neck deep to the sternocleidomastoid. Type of abscess?
- A. Bezold abscess67%
- B. Citelli abscess17%
- C. Luc abscess12%
- D. Zygomatic abscess4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
68M with AF on dabigatran presents with a major GI bleed. Specific reversal agent?
- A. Andexanet alfa25%
- B. Protamine sulfate26%
- C. Vitamin K13%
- D. Idarucizumab36%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
5M had a fall on an outstretched hand 1 yr ago. He now has the elbow deformity shown. Dx?
- A. Undisplaced supracondylar fracture8%
- B. Malunion of supracondylar fracture humerus83%
- C. Dislocated radial head7%
- D. Proximal humerus fracture2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,494 posts we hold for @damsdelhiofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@damsdelhiofficial edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 5 September 2026
- Most recent edit
- 15 October 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @damsdelhiofficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 4 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 September 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 14 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Polls
The 6 most recent of 438 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
34F with ptosis and diplopia that worsen by evening. Most specific investigation?
- A. Ice-pack test14%
- B. Serum creatine kinase7%
- C. Nerve conduction velocity21%
- D. Anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies58%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
9M is hyperactive, impulsive and inattentive at home and school for 1 yr. First-line drug?
- A. Methylphenidate65%
- B. Haloperidol15%
- C. Fluoxetine16%
- D. Lithium4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
28F with optic neuritis. MRI brain FLAIR shows ovoid periventricular lesions perpendicular to the lateral ventricles. Sign and Dx?
- A. Hot cross bun – MSA10%
- B. Hummingbird sign – PSP13%
- C. Dawson fingers – multiple sclerosis69%
- D. Eye of the tiger – PKAN7%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Agent of choice for inhalational induction in a 4-yr-old child?
- A. Desflurane8%
- B. Sevoflurane78%
- C. Isoflurane10%
- D. Nitrous oxide alone4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
26F with thin grey-white vaginal discharge and fishy odour; vaginal pH 5.0. Which finding on wet mount confirms the likely Dx?
- A. Pseudohyphae8%
- B. Motile flagellated organisms40%
- C. Koilocytes3%
- D. Clue cells49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Under NIDDCP, what is the minimum iodine content of iodised salt at the consumer level?
- A. 30 ppm20%
- B. 10 ppm21%
- C. 15 ppm57%
- D. 50 ppm2%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@obgynwithDrDeepti · 75,262#1
@kayspsm · 42,411#2
@drnikitarwm · 83,303#3
@damsfmge · 10,846#4
@PSMSID · 27,765#5
@pathologybydrpreeti · 124,636#6
@drshrikantverma · 13,240#7
@pyqneetpgfmge · 31,712#8
@pwmeded · 54,013#9
@PYQchannel · 28,394#10
@sdjazz · 18,057#11
@mcqsmeetsmnemonics · 11,890#12
@bhanuprakashdr · 139,886#13
@notebook20th · 8,894#14
@doctopia · 7,337#15
@NEETPG2023DISCUSSIONCHANNEL · 15,634#16
@integratedlearningchannel · 34,680#17
@medicalsnippets · 8,975#18
@targetfmgechannel · 13,885#19
@DrAshishNEXT · 22,777#20
@medicalshark · 8,655#21
@MBBS_images_imp · 14,490#22
@Drfornix1 · 1,296#23
@Medicine_Youtube · 13,462#24
@medicalwarriors · 7,989#25
@NEETPG_Counselling · 12,100#26
@DAMSOphthalmologySS · 14,497#27
@inicetneetpg24 · 5,671#28
@Drgangamed · 62,975#29
@Medical_material_pv2 · 10,411#30
@RadiologywithSumer · 34,380#31
@zainabvorachannel · 117,918#32
@DoctorgovtjobMedexupdate · 18,712#33
@DBMCIOfficialChannel · 44,180#34
@cerebellumacademychannel · 16,926#35
@crackpsmwithdrneha · 49,739#36
@NEETPGCounsellingChannel · 23,049#37
@QuizFmgeNeetpg · 18,014#38
@MedicalNewsUpdates · 6,930#39
@microghg · 11,811#40
@medicaltheorist · 13,663#41
@forensic_jp · 4,607#42
@mukhmohitPSM_channel · 19,173#43
@drsakshiaroramamschannel · 15,023#44
@MedicoXpert4 · 2,549#45
@SurgeryHUBs · 7,484#46
@one_stop_medico · 68,255#47
@Cerebellum_academy_official · 20,760#48
@nextpgneetmcq · 16,578#49
@damsnorcet · 18,906#50
@fmgemcqsdaily · 12,646#51
@micromagicsquiz · 5,077#52
@rmojobs · 7,761#53
@SRISAINEETPG · 19,204#54
@TNMRBUPDATES · 16,902#55
@mamta_jawa_mjmicro · 5,208#56
@Doctorusmlechannel · 75,923#57
@cerebellumacademyneetpg · 5,657#58
@PYQNEETPGFMGEINICET · 12,252#59
@DrAnkitPharmacologySeries · 19,539#60
@library_mbbs_books · 8,740#61
@All_Coaching_Lectures_Available · 19,247#62
@CEREBELLUMNEETPGFMG · 63,005#63
@drnihaophthalmology · 17,560#64
@WorldOfMagicalMnemonics · 1,632#65
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@PYQchannel · 28,394
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026
@obgynwithDrDeepti · 75,262
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
@PSMSID · 27,765
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
@kayspsm · 42,411
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 28 August 2026
@pwmeded · 54,013
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
@DBMCIOfficialChannel · 44,180
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
@crackpsmwithdrneha · 49,739
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
@drnikitarwm · 83,303
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
@DrAshishNEXT · 22,777
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
@pathologybydrpreeti · 124,636
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 August 2026
@bhanuprakashdr · 139,886
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
@mukhmohitPSM_channel · 19,173
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 October 2026
@RadiologywithSumer · 34,380
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
@integratedlearningchannel · 34,680
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
@Drgangamed · 62,975
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
@DrAnkitPharmacologySeries · 19,539
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@one_stop_medico · 68,255
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
@Drpriyeshorthobioc · 64,702
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 August 2026
@pyqneetpgfmge · 31,712
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
@zainabvorachannel · 117,918
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
@cerebellumacademyCA · 20,017
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 29 September 2026
@rohankhandelwalsurgery · 21,064
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 September 2026
@Marrow_Mbbs_lectures_Ed8_Notes · 52,790
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 9 September 2026
@Doctorusmlechannel · 75,923
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“DAMS OFFICIAL” (@damsdelhiofficial), 59,201 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/damsdelhiofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.