https://t.me/neetpg3/49717

Channel
NEET PG /FMGE/INICET/CMS ( MCQ pratice, discussion, tricks and tips)
@nextpgneetmcq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
16,258subscribers
+166 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001964830843 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nextpgneetmcq |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 21 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 21 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nextpgneetmcq |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 16,258 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 16,260 | +6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 16,254 | +7 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 16,247 | +13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:23 | 16,234 | +14 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 16,220 | +24 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:38 | 16,196 | +14 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 16,182 | +10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:11 | 16,172 | +16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:32 | 16,156 | +19 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:52 | 16,137 | +15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 16,122 | +19 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:42 | 16,103 | +11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 16,092 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 16,092 | first reading |
Engagement
111 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.46%
- avg views ÷ 16,258 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 562
- 110 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.144%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 111
- of 111 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 21 of 110 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 111 (6 August 2026 – 21 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61,839 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Aug 2026, 11:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈65
- Links
- ≈1,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 15 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 76.2% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 111 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Common nerve injury in flexion type of supracondylar humerus fracture
- Median nerve19%
- Anterior interosseos nerve (AIN)54%
- Ulnar nerve15%
- Radial nerve11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
The most common nerve injury in supracondylar fracture of humerus-
- Median nerve19%
- Anterior interosseos nerve50%
- Ulnar nerve19%
- Radial nerve13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
https://t.me/neetpg3/49675
All are correctly matched except-
- Allopurinol- xanthine oxidase inhibitor9%
- Raburicase- recombinant urate oxidase inhibitor32%
- Febuoxstat- xanthine oxidase inhibitor34%
- Probencid- inhibitor reuptake of urate at PCT25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
https://t.me/neetpg3/49654
False about rate, ratio, and proportion-
- Incidence is a rate and prevalence is proportion17%
- IMR is rate and MMR is ratio21%
- Case fatality rate is ratio and secondary attack rate is rate44%
- Odd ratio and relative risk both are ratio18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
https://t.me/neetpg3/49635
In a RCT, during follow up, some subjects from control group start taking intervention of treatment group, if final analysis done by per protocol, those subjects should be..
- Ignore from control group18%
- Include in treatment group32%
- Remain in control group21%
- Do randomization again, and allot group28%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤1
https://t.me/neetpg3/49621
❤1
Which is not component of trauma Triad of death-
- Acidosis26%
- Hemorrhage38%
- Coagulopathy16%
- Hypothermia20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👏3
44-year-old woman has advanced cervical cancer and a 14-year-old daughter. What advice should be given to the daughter?
- A. Advise HPV vaccine67%
- B. Screen for BRCA mutation21%
- C. Screen for PTEN mutation6%
- D. Perform cervical biopsy6%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 111 posts we hold for @nextpgneetmcq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 55 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Common nerve injury in flexion type of supracondylar humerus fracture
- Median nerve19%
- Anterior interosseos nerve (AIN)54%
- Ulnar nerve15%
- Radial nerve11%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The most common nerve injury in supracondylar fracture of humerus-
- Median nerve19%
- Anterior interosseos nerve50%
- Ulnar nerve19%
- Radial nerve13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
All are correctly matched except-
- Allopurinol- xanthine oxidase inhibitor9%
- Raburicase- recombinant urate oxidase inhibitor32%
- Febuoxstat- xanthine oxidase inhibitor34%
- Probencid- inhibitor reuptake of urate at PCT25%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
False about rate, ratio, and proportion-
- Incidence is a rate and prevalence is proportion17%
- IMR is rate and MMR is ratio21%
- Case fatality rate is ratio and secondary attack rate is rate44%
- Odd ratio and relative risk both are ratio18%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
In a RCT, during follow up, some subjects from control group start taking intervention of treatment group, if final analysis done by per protocol, those subjects should be..
- Ignore from control group18%
- Include in treatment group32%
- Remain in control group21%
- Do randomization again, and allot group28%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Which is not component of trauma Triad of death-
- Acidosis26%
- Hemorrhage38%
- Coagulopathy16%
- Hypothermia20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 111 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NEET PG /FMGE/INICET/CMS ( MCQ pratice, discussion, tricks and tips)” (@nextpgneetmcq), 16,258 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nextpgneetmcq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.