https://youtu.be/tZGUUdftpxo?si=y5FmqCGxhYwNeDWH

Channel
Dr. Zainab Vora Channel
@zainabvorachannel
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
117,908subscribers
+4,429 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001933394121 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zainabvorachannel |
| Description | Channel for relaying the important messages for NEET PG aspirants |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zainabvorachannel |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:19 | 117,908 | -10 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:34 | 117,918 | -26 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:26 | 117,944 | +3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 03:24 | 117,941 | -14 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:29 | 117,955 | +62 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 22:19 | 117,893 | +21 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:59 | 117,872 | -1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 17:20 | 117,873 | +34 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 20:35 | 117,839 | +33 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:58 | 117,806 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 21:40 | 117,802 | +7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:28 | 117,795 | -1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 15:29 | 117,796 | +33 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 13:26 | 117,763 | +57 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:58 | 117,706 | +88 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:17 | 117,618 | +20 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:40 | 117,598 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:27 | 117,600 | -29 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:31 | 117,629 | +10 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 13:05 | 117,619 | first reading |
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 192 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.3%
- avg views ÷ 117,908 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 29,900
- 42 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 133 (22 July 2026 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,254,600 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 352
- Videos
- 5
- Links
- 354
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 4s
- Average length
- 4s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
https://youtu.be/AeRkanjUJ_g?si=sD_KlauXioAvo8fS
https://youtu.be/3b9l2EX5r98?si=Kqpet_hx-8NJ9zXj
https://youtu.be/1OY_Kr7E1GU?si=g0lwpUtmIKMLWjBc
https://youtu.be/DOYbgGnBuO8?si=iaGuO8QM2oKQrCQA
https://youtu.be/zBkQqD19fgk?si=E8Y8auRSLI4bdNL1
https://youtu.be/2KVW552Pj9U?si=9ArhkmUOXWuHrFAS
Hey everyone! Congratulations to all the rankers in INICET! Thank you for your kind msgs and making me and CoreBTR a part of your journey! Hoping to meet a lot of you in Dopamine on 14th! For those who’re not happy with the ranks, take a week off, live a little and enjoy the festival-decide whether you want to take a drop or take up a seat after a few days break with a clear mind. We will start with a new schedule f…
https://rrpdocuments.aiimsexams.ac.in/1794028718401-947447639.pdf?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAVRUVRLXWMSLVSAP7%2F20261107%2Fap-south-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20261107T052015Z&X-Amz-Expires=604800&X-Amz-Signature=f3979a977df65ba7d04025c2a43d7fc2b83134b9b288e670d45e1c41f91f606f&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf All the best 🤞🏻🤞🏻
INICET November 2026 now available under PYQ explorer-It will be available as a recall Grand test from 8 November 9am-with video solutions! This should be given as a grand test for all students who didn’t appear for INI Nov 2026 as a baseline test to also evaluate the current level of exam! This will be the first GT of this month and the next GT of November will be a new GT!
Goodevening everyone, This is for everyone attending the event DOPAMINE. Please follow the steps mentioned below to proceed further Please visit the event website as under -https://dopaminehighonlife.com You can explore the event highlights and components using the website Website has a register link which will take you to COREBTR portal for registration (Step 1) Once you register on the portal , your credentials w…
Integrated systems Test is live-live discussion tomorrow at 6pm! Ps. This one is for the schedule that started in September! All students can join though and give this test as a baseline! For those starting afresh, I’ll give one more schedule so that all students can be on the same page this week which will start from 11 November after Diwali! See you all tomorrow ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @zainabvorachannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 4 posts on @zainabvorachannel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 2 September 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 18 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 34 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@drnikitarwm · 83,284#1
@cerebellumacademychannel · 16,926#2
@pathologybydrpreeti · 124,636#3
@notebook20th · 8,890#4
@Drgangamed · 62,950#5
@medicalsnippets · 8,980#6
@medicaltheorist · 13,667#7
@All_Coaching_Lectures_Available · 19,247#8
@pyqneetpgfmge · 31,728#9
@NEETPG_Counselling · 12,095#10
@FitDocMed · 13,045#11
@mcqsmeetsmnemonics · 11,889#12
@medicalwarriors · 7,989#13
@Drfornix1 · 1,296#14
@CerebellumAcademyPvtLtd · 37,593#15
@studywithteejay · 9,667#16
@rohankhandelwalsurgery · 21,068#17
@medicmate · 1,442#18
@pwmeded · 54,019#19
@DoctorgovtjobMedexupdate · 18,710#20
@obgynwithDrDeepti · 75,251#21
@damsdelhiofficial · 59,195#22
@MedicalNewsUpdates · 6,930#23
@NEETPGCounsellingChannel · 23,083#24
@kayspsm · 42,411#25
@CEREBELLUMNEETPGFMG · 62,998#26
@SRISAINEETPG · 19,204#27
@drsakshiaroramamschannel · 15,015#28
@RadiologywithSumer · 34,344#29
@inicetneetpg24 · 5,671#30
@cerebellumacademyCA · 20,012#31
@Cerebellum_academy_official · 20,757#32
@studyysesion · 861#33
@one_stop_medico · 68,298#34
@drnihaophthalmology · 17,549#35
@firstaidwithme · 8,884#36
@rmojobs · 7,761#37
@doctopia · 7,337#38
@crackpsmwithdrneha · 49,739#39
@studywithdrdeepak · 25,268#40
@NEETPG2023DISCUSSIONCHANNEL · 15,634#41
@drshrikantverma · 13,229#42
@Doctorusmlechannel · 75,923#43
@medtalkss00 · 11,544#44
@AINAChannelOfficial · 2,105#45
@haryanamo · 1,679#46
@microghg · 11,818#47
@PSMSID · 27,749#48
@sdjazz · 18,045#49
@medicalshark · 8,655#50
@PYQchannel · 28,394#51
@DBMCIOfficialChannel · 44,168#52
@mukhmohitPSM_channel · 19,164#53
@cerebellumacademyneetpg · 5,657#54
@MedicoXpert4 · 2,549#55
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@All_Coaching_Lectures_Available · 19,247
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 4 October 2026
@btrinicet · 21,507
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
@CerebellumAcademyPvtLtd · 37,593
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 31 August 2026
@drnikitarwm · 83,284
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
@pathologybydrpreeti · 124,636
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 26 August 2026
@Drgangamed · 62,950
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
@rohankhandelwalsurgery · 21,068
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 25 September 2026
@Drpriyeshorthobioc · 64,702
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 August 2026
@crackpsmwithdrneha · 49,739
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 August 2026
@RadiologywithSumer · 34,344
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 3 September 2026
@one_stop_medico · 68,298
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
@pwmeded · 54,019
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 26 August 2026
@DrAnkitPharmacologySeries · 19,533
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 October 2026
@CEREBELLUMNEETPGFMG · 62,998
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
@obgynwithDrDeepti · 75,251
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 26 August 2026
@bhanuprakashdr · 139,888
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
@pyqneetpgfmge · 31,728
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 6 September 2026
@studywithdrdeepak · 25,268
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 September 2026
@Doctorusmlechannel · 75,923
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 26 August 2026
@DBMCI_ONE1 · 32,208
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 9 September 2026
@NEETPGCounsellingChannel · 23,083
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 September 2026
@Marrow_Mbbs_lectures_Ed8_Notes · 52,790
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 9 September 2026
@PSMSID · 27,749
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
@integratedlearningchannel · 34,702
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Zainab Vora Channel” (@zainabvorachannel), 117,908 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zainabvorachannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.