Channel
@PYQchannel
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
29,146subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001289584674 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @PYQchannel |
| Description | Channel curated specially for PYQ's πContains PYQ's from exams NEET PG | INI-CET | FMGE | UPSC-CMS Discussion Venue:- @PYQdiscussion For any queries, Contact owner @DrRajeshK |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/PYQchannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 29,146 | -8 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:48 | 29,154 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 29,152 | -15 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:21 | 29,167 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 29,164 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 29,168 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 29,169 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 14:49 | 29,169 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 31 (5 July 2026 β 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 8,097 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 21:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 12 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
45 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 45 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
2544. Explanation Correct answer: A. Anterior dislocation of hip Anterior hip dislocation is a rare injury caused by force abduction and external rotation. It presents with the limbs in abduction, external rotation and slight flexion with the femoral head sometimes palpable in the groin. Urgent closed reduction under sedation or GA is the treatment of choice Join@PYQtimes
β€1
Posted without readable text
For allotment city π βͺοΈLogin here https://cdn3.digialm.com/EForms/configuredHtml/1815/94357/login.html βͺοΈFollow the π‘ PYQ Times π‘ channel on WhatsApp: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Va4jgsOAYlUBw0ug521h
π¨ NEET-PG 2026 UPDATE π Test City details have been updated. β οΈ Some candidates received incorrect SMS due to technical issues. β Check your NBEMS Applicant Portal for the correct test city. π² Follow PYQ Times for regular NEET-PG updates & PYQs. https://t.me/PYQtimes
2453. Explanation Correct Answer: A) Pulled elbow Explanation: The condition indicates a pulled elbow (nursemaid's elbow) caused by a sudden pull on the arm, leading to radial head subluxation. The classic arm position is slightly flexed and pronated. Pulled Elbow (also known as Nursemaid's Elbow) Age group: 1-5 years (most common) Mechanism of injury: A sudden jerk or pull on the arm when it is extended and pronβ¦
β€1
Posted without readable text
2452. Explanation Correct Answer: A) Osteoarthritis Explanation: Involvement of PIP and DIP joint with sparing of MCP and wrist joints is suggestive of Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis : Joint involved & characteristics Proximal and Distal interphalangeal joints (PIP and DIP), 1st Carpometacarpal joint, Hip and knee Asymmetrical involvement Joint spared : Wrist and Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints Rheumatoid arthβ¦
β€1
Posted without readable text
β€1
2451. Explanation Correct Answer: B) Fat embolism Explanation: The most likely diagnosis is Fat Embolism due to the combination of confusion, petechial rash, tachycardia, tachypnea, and low oxygen saturation following a femur fracture. Fat embolism : Fat embolism is a multi-organ disorder caused by fat globules entering the bloodstream, commonly occurring after high-risk orthopedic injuries particularly femur fractβ¦
What is the probable diagnosis for a patient who was admitted to the intensive care unit 48 hours after fracturing their femur, with a saturation of oxygen in the rebreathing unit at 100%, but their SpO,remained at 60%patient is also experiencing confusion, and a chest radiograph shows clear lung fields.
Posted without readable text
β€1
Cerebellum FMGE ONLINE COURSE Mission 200+ Not Just Classes - A complete Learning Ecosystem #FMGE π‘Use Discount Code:- PYQTIMES For any queries, contactπ http://wa.me/919423559901
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @PYQchannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
2546. A female patient with a history of fall few months back presents with the deformity shown in the image. Probing into history reveals it was managed with traditional treatment. This deformity is likely to be due to?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 181,934 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ‘π‘πͺπ’ πππππππ π‘β (@PYQchannel), 29,146 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/PYQchannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.