Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +294. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,241–8,623 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:40
8,579
+23
13 Sept 2026, 21:38
8,556
+31
10 Sept 2026, 09:02
8,525
+11
4 Sept 2026, 23:58
8,514
+31
1 Sept 2026, 09:34
8,483
+37
29 Aug 2026, 14:53
8,446
+32
26 Aug 2026, 23:38
8,414
+6
24 Aug 2026, 06:36
8,408
+40
20 Aug 2026, 07:02
8,368
+29
16 Aug 2026, 21:05
8,339
+35
13 Aug 2026, 02:58
8,304
-3
10 Aug 2026, 07:34
8,307
+20
6 Aug 2026, 21:02
8,287
+2
6 Aug 2026, 11:46
8,285
first reading
Engagement
258 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.02%
avg views ÷ 8,579 subscribers
Avg views / post
517
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 258 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
258 (5 August 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
29,971
Reactions total
709
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 55s
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,355 reactions across 256 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,187
35.4%
👍
1,010
30.1%
🔥
452
13.5%
🙏
217
6.47%
👏
215
6.41%
😈
61
1.82%
🤬
45
1.34%
❤🔥
28
0.835%
💯
27
0.805%
👀
25
0.745%
😱
20
0.596%
😢
11
0.328%
⚡
10
0.298%
😁
8
0.238%
🥴
8
0.238%
🤔
5
0.149%
🤝
4
0.119%
👌
3
0.089%
👎
3
0.089%
🤯
3
0.089%
10 further kinds
13
0.387%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 256 of the 258 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,355 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 258 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Quando sento qualcuno domandare, con un sorriso ingenuo, "Ma perché mai dovrebbero fare tutto questo?", provo un brivido di pietà. Sento la voce di chi crede ancora che il sistema sia stato progettato per proteggerlo. Non è così. I sistemi basati sul potere assoluto hanno un unico, aberrante scopo: preservare e replicare il potere stesso. Lo sono sempre stati, fin dalle prime dinastie mesopotamiche. Lo saranno sempre…
Immaginate le società segrete come reliquie del passato: figure incappucciate, candele consumate e sussurri in stanze di pietra. È questa l'architettura infantile che vi hanno convinto a cercare, affinché non vi accorgeste mai della verità. La realtà è infinitamente più fredda, geometrica e spietata. Gli esseri umani creano reti. Sempre. Club d’affari, consigli d’amministrazione, dinastie politiche, confraternite uni…
E poi c'è il capolavoro dell'ingegneria culturale. Inonda le strade di dopamina a basso costo tramite piccoli rettangoli di vetro nero che le persone accarezzano ossessivamente, e guarda la capacità di attenzione dell'umanità crollare sotto la soglia di quella di un insetto. Inonda i telegiornali di minacce invisibili, virus, catastrofi imminenti, e guarda la gente terrorizzata implorare in ginocchio di essere incate…
E guarda le corsie dei tuoi supermercati. Le catene di approvvigionamento non spingono per puro caso le sostanze più tossiche, economiche e addictive nel tuo piatto. Cibo spazzatura a ogni angolo di strada, progettato in laboratorio per ingannare i tuoi recettori cerebrali. Oli industriali idrogenati ovunque. Zucchero raffinato che agisce come cocaina legale in ogni alimento. Schermi retroilluminati che emettono radi…
Continui a porre quella domanda. La sussurri con un filo di voce, con gli occhi sgranati e perplessi, come se quel dubbio fosse una sorta di scudo intellettuale per proteggerti dall'abisso che ti si spalanca davanti.
«Ma perché lo farebbero?»
Lo chiedi con un sorriso nervoso, quasi a voler implorare che qualcuno ti smentisca. Perché manipolare i mercati finanziari fino a farli sanguinare? Perché orchestrare guerre …
Decenni di lavaggio del cervello chimico e indottrinamento culturale vi hanno privato dell'arma più potente che avevate: la capacità di pensare in modo autonomo. Vi hanno svuotato dall'interno, lasciando solo un guscio biologico che risponde ai comandi.
Allora ponetevi l'unica domanda che conta, quella che vi terrà svegli nel buio della stanza: perché ci sono persone, intorno a voi, che ogni mattina si svegliano e s…
🔥 L'Architettura del Macello: Il Giorno in cui l'Allevamento Smise di Nascondersi
Il risultato del sistema è il risultato della progettazione del sistema. Non ci sono errori. Non ci sono mai stati.
La mente umana possiede un meccanismo di difesa biologico: rifiuta l’orrore puro. Davanti a un abisso troppo profondo, preferisce credere all'incompetenza piuttosto che alla malizia. La persona media cammina sotto il sol…
L'Architettura del Macello:
Il Giorno in cui l'Allevamento Smise di Nascondersi
Il risultato del sistema è
il risultato della progettazione del sistema.
Ma nonostante ciò, l'attuale CDC, sotto l'attuale Presidente, ha appena acquistato 1,25 miliardi di dollari in ulteriori vaccini anti-COVID. E l'attuale FDA, sotto l'attuale Presidente, ha appena approvato il nuovo vaccino antinfluenzale a mRNA di Moderna per la stagione autunnale. Chi lo sa, lo sa. Buona fortuna a tutti i giocatori di scacchi 5D e a tutti coloro che "si fidano del piano" ancora là fuori.
Ogni singola donna e il suo partner dovrebbero insorgere. Il Dr. Thorpe testimonia che le donne incinte sono state prese di mira per il vaccino mRNA contro il COVID-19 perché erano considerate il "frutto più facile da raggiungere", perché vulnerabili e le principali responsabili delle decisioni sanitarie in famiglia.
Questo NONOSTANTE gli studi della Pfizer che hanno dimostrato che le donne incinte vaccinate che son…
💥❤️ La linea temporale dei miracoli è iniziata
L’aria ora sembra diversa. Più leggera. Più luminosa. Persino il tempo stesso sembra scorrere con maggiore grazia. Quello che percepisci è reale. Siamo entrati in una nuova linea temporale e, in questa linea temporale, i miracoli non stanno per arrivare: sono già iniziati.
Potresti provare momenti di improvvisa pace, come se il peso che ti portavi dietro si fosse sile…
❤19👍4💯1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 258 posts we hold for @curenaturalidottmartucci. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Michelangelo Martucci • Cure Naturali” (@curenaturalidottmartucci), 8,579 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/curenaturalidottmartucci.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.