Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cyber Threat Intelligence

Channel

Cyber Threat Intelligence

@ctinow

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,690subscribers

+1,676 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001323386230
TypeChannel
Username@ctinow
DescriptionCyber Threat Intelligence (CTI), is an organised, analysed and refined information about potential or current attacks that threaten an organisation(s) or individual(s).
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ctinow

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

37,01438,69037,8526 August 2026 — 37,014 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,016 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,046 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,069 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,096 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,119 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,139 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,190 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,247 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,313 subscribers16 August 2026 — 37,337 subscribers17 August 2026 — 37,356 subscribers18 August 2026 — 37,387 subscribers19 August 2026 — 37,410 subscribers20 August 2026 — 37,427 subscribers22 August 2026 — 37,463 subscribers24 August 2026 — 37,521 subscribers25 August 2026 — 37,555 subscribers26 August 2026 — 37,583 subscribers27 August 2026 — 37,609 subscribers28 August 2026 — 37,648 subscribers29 August 2026 — 37,676 subscribers30 August 2026 — 37,703 subscribers31 August 2026 — 37,716 subscribers1 September 2026 — 37,747 subscribers2 September 2026 — 37,774 subscribers3 September 2026 — 37,795 subscribers5 September 2026 — 37,862 subscribers8 September 2026 — 37,976 subscribers11 September 2026 — 38,104 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,187 subscribers15 September 2026 — 38,242 subscribers16 September 2026 — 38,343 subscribers19 September 2026 — 38,442 subscribers26 September 2026 — 38,690 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 51 days, net +1,676. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 36,763–38,941 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 07:0038,690+248
19 Sept 2026, 06:4038,442+99
16 Sept 2026, 23:1838,343+101
15 Sept 2026, 00:5838,242+55
13 Sept 2026, 11:2038,187+83
11 Sept 2026, 15:1938,104+128
8 Sept 2026, 22:1737,976+114
5 Sept 2026, 13:5637,862+67
3 Sept 2026, 17:4137,795+21
2 Sept 2026, 09:1737,774+27
1 Sept 2026, 07:1537,747+31
31 Aug 2026, 10:3537,716+13
30 Aug 2026, 08:4237,703+27
29 Aug 2026, 07:2537,676+28
28 Aug 2026, 07:3637,648+39
27 Aug 2026, 04:2937,609+26
26 Aug 2026, 07:0237,583+28
25 Aug 2026, 05:2837,555+34
24 Aug 2026, 01:3937,521+58
22 Aug 2026, 06:4737,463first reading

Engagement

1,414 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.602%
avg views ÷ 38,690 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
701 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
702
of 1,414 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held1,414 (6 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total163,320
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5
Links
≈256,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

27 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC129 viewsread 27 September 2026

CyberCodex: Autonomous 22-Source Zero-Cost OSINT, Data Breach, Infostealer & Threat Intelligence CLI Engine + Cyber Warfare Encyclopedia (Zero Dependencies, 0 API Keys) https://ift.tt/rkBJavK

27 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC196 viewsread 27 September 2026

Rydox Admin Faces 20 Years After Selling Stolen Data and Fraud Tools https://ift.tt/KdVWa0C

27 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC217 viewsread 27 September 2026

Aussie family shattered when fit dad, 32, suffers sudden heart failure after assuming he'd caught 'another daycare virus': 'The signs were very different to a heart attack' https://ift.tt/5ph6FcY

27 Sept 2026, 09:29 UTC309 viewsread 27 September 2026

Microsoft SharePoint Flaw CVE-2026-65660 Now Exploited in Attacks https://ift.tt/79BZe05

27 Sept 2026, 08:09 UTC324 viewsread 27 September 2026

Warning: Two Unpatched Citrix NetScaler RCE Zero-Days Under Active Exploitation https://ift.tt/qwhdAKC

27 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC336 viewsread 27 September 2026

‘Mum, where did my Robux go?’ The Roblox scam targeting children https://ift.tt/VyLxr6u

27 Sept 2026, 01:19 UTC467 viewsread 27 September 2026

OpenAI halts training of latest models as reports mount of AI agents going rogue https://ift.tt/98ikESM

27 Sept 2026, 01:14 UTC400 viewsread 27 September 2026

Mumbai Sessions Court Denies Anticipatory Bail To Govandi Man Accused Of Supplying Bank Accounts For Cyber Fraud https://ift.tt/CoD617P

26 Sept 2026, 20:34 UTC400 viewsread 27 September 2026

Mumbai Cyber Fraud: Retired BARC Technician Loses ₹24.80 Lakh After Fraudsters Pose As CID, Police Officials https://ift.tt/I7B5NVS

26 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC420 viewsread 27 September 2026

ShinyHunters uses WAF bypass trick in Oracle PeopleSoft attacks https://ift.tt/HphN378

26 Sept 2026, 19:04 UTC342 viewsread 27 September 2026

Lunex Stealer Abuses AMD Driver to Disable Security Monitoring and Steal Browser Credentials https://ift.tt/TvnAYa9

26 Sept 2026, 18:54 UTC358 viewsread 27 September 2026

11 held for running fake call centre, supplying SIMs for cyber fraud https://ift.tt/TQx8Irc

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,414 posts we hold for @ctinow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Pentesting News
@PentestingNews · 26,663
#1
The Hacker News
@thehackernews · 164,155
#2
Blue Team | SOC | DFIR | Cloud Security
@BlueTeamOps · 27,712
#3
Security Harvester
@secharvester · 9,847
#4
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,032
#5
🛡 Cybersecurity & Privacy 🛡 - News
@cibsecurity · 28,261
#6
The Bug Bounty Hunter
@thebugbountyhunter · 50,736
#7
🛡Cybersecurity | Privacy | News 🛡
@cybersecurity_outlook · 9,867
#8
Threathunting
@CyberThreatHunting · 7,082
#9
OSCP+ Exam Resources👩‍💻
@noobtooscp · 22,787
#10
Information Security
@information_security_channel · 11,521
#11
Cyber Security News
@Cyber_Security_Channel · 56,644
#12
Threat Hunting & DFIR
@DFIRHunting · 6,586
#13
cKure
@cKure · 7,089
#14
Vulnerability News
@VulnerabilityNews · 5,325
#15
RedPacket Security
@RedPacketSecurity · 3,053
#16
Cyber Defend
@Cyber_Defend · 7,892
#17
Cyber SIRT & Threat Hunting
@CyberSIRT · 3,692
#18
Daily Bounty Writeups
@dailybountywriteup · 10,111
#19
Cyber Detective
@cybdetective · 27,360
#20
CTF Training
@HackTheBox_Training · 6,596
#21
All Security Engineering Courses
@AllSecurityEngineeringCourses · 19,250
#22
Hide01
@Hide01 · 35,428
#23
Infosec Learning
@Infoseclearning · 12,999
#24
Osint Losena
@OsintLosena · 8,012
#25
Blue Team
@BlueTeamKit · 5,554
#26
Bug bounty Tips
@bugbounty_tech · 7,151
#27
RME-DisCo @ UNIZAR [www.reversea.me]
@reverseame · 3,534
#28
OSINT ANATOMY
@osint_anatomy · 10,828
#29
CISO as a Service
@CISOasaService · 5,347
#30
PwnSystem
@officialpwnsystem · 6,210
#31
IT Audit and Governance
@IT_Audit · 7,131
#32
VenariX
@Venari_By_BetterCyber · 5,137
#33
Offensive Xwitter
@OffensiveTwitter · 21,041
#34
Cybersecurity Study Group
@cybersecuritycare · 13,250
#35
Information Security 24/7
@informationsecuritylife · 8,080
#36
APT
@APT_Notes · 16,685
#37
Udemy
@udemyrip · 68,291
#38
BugXplorer
@bugxplorer · 9,775
#39
Network Learning
@learningnets · 30,505
#40
cve.mitre.org
@cve_mitre_org · 1,303
#41
Information Security, Risk, Compliance, GRC
@itseccompliance · 8,221
#42

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Pentesting News
@PentestingNews · 26,663
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 12 September 2026
Blue Team | SOC | DFIR | Cloud Security
@BlueTeamOps · 27,712
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 September 2026
🛡 Cybersecurity & Privacy 🛡 - News
@cibsecurity · 28,261
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,032
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
Codelivly - Your Journey To Cybersecurity
@codelivly · 35,373
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
The Hacker News
@thehackernews · 164,155
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
CyberDost
@cyberdosti4c · 21,531
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 23 September 2026
Cloud and Cybersecurity
@cloudandcybersecurity · 21,809
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
Cyber Security News
@Cyber_Security_Channel · 56,644
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
OSCP+ Exam Resources👩‍💻
@noobtooscp · 22,787
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 September 2026
Cyber Detective
@cybdetective · 27,360
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
🔗 Join in RedBlueTM 🎩
@RedBlueTM · 21,371
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 23 September 2026
Hide01
@Hide01 · 35,428
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 September 2026
Learn Cybersecurity
@teammatrixs · 23,937
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 17 September 2026
The Bug Bounty Hunter
@thebugbountyhunter · 50,736
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
Offensive Xwitter
@OffensiveTwitter · 21,041
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
Udemy
@udemyrip · 68,291
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 21 August 2026
️Cyber Security Sharks️
@CyberSecurityforall24 · 34,822
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 3 September 2026
Artificial Intelligence
@Artificial_Intelligence_COM · 72,023
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 20 August 2026
Pentesting with Kali Linux
@PentestingConKaliLinux · 23,957
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 25 here — alongside 24 others — read 17 September 2026
Network Learning
@learningnets · 30,505
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026
🤖 OpenAI | ChatGPT | GPT-4o | GPT-4👨🏻‍💻
@gpt_anthropic · 24,950
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 14 September 2026
Cyber Security Sharks 2
@cybersecurityforall77 · 29,203
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 9 September 2026
Udemy4U - Free Udemy Courses
@Udemy4U · 115,585
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cyber Threat Intelligence” (@ctinow), 38,690 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ctinow.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.