11 Aug 2026, 10:52 UTC≈3,310 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Found an interesting service called TellData.
It can help check whether the details someone gives you—name, phone number, address, etc.—actually match. Could be useful for a small shop or service business before giving an unfamiliar person keys, goods, or access to a property.
The reports aren’t exactly cheap, but one bad surprise can be much more expensive 😅
Here’s how it works.
Has anyone tried it or knows a better…
⚡5❤3🤔1
5 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈4,370 views16 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
Threads can unlock a "private" Instagram account
Threads accounts are directly tied to Instagram. You can't create one without an Instagram account, and both share the same username. That connection is often the first breadcrumb, confirming that a Threads and Instagram profile belong to the same person, even if one of them has since changed usernames.
The bigger gap is privacy settings. When Threads launched, many us…
❤15🔥1
3 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈8,510 views7 reactionsread 1 September 2026 File
Has anyone here tried ClearCheck?
I've been using it recently for background checks and was curious what other people's experience has been. I don't see it mentioned very often.
If you've used it, what did you think? Better or worse than Checkr or GoodHire?
https://clearcheck.io/
❤6🥰1
6 Jun 2026, 20:23 UTC≈11,600 views17 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
🕵️ New tool for your OSINT workflow:
Credential Breach Checker — cross-reference emails, phones, full names, and social IDs against breach/leak intelligence sources. Async polling, structured output, batch up to 25 values per run.
Built by us, running on Apify. Try it free.
→ https://apify.com/clearcheck.io/credential-breach-checker
❤9⚡3👍3🔥2
17 May 2026, 17:24 UTC≈12,000 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
There is a tool most Americans do not know exists.
You enter a person's name, phone number, and SSN. You get back their real identity,
criminal history, address records, and watchlist status. In about two minutes.
They do not know you checked. No notification on their end.
It is called ClearCheck. US-only. Built for people who hire, rent to, or go into business
with someone and want to know the truth before they comm…
🔥9👍1
15 Mar 2026, 13:58 UTC≈16,600 views12 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
Same name. Same city.
Looks harmless.
Until your system starts scoring the wrong person.
Short breakdown here.
👍7❤5
27 Feb 2026, 13:21 UTC≈17,600 views9 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
Don’t overwrite data in your KYC system.
Store every value with proof (source + time + confidence).
Why this matters 👇
❤5🔥3✍1
20 Feb 2026, 10:52 UTC≈15,900 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
Most teams don’t lack APIs.
They lack an Enrichment Brain.
This week: how to design one /enrich endpoint that returns profile + score + next action.
Full discussion on Reddit
❤10
13 Feb 2026, 15:23 UTC≈15,200 views6 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
Phone numbers get recycled.
In screening systems, that creates silent risk.
If you escalate based only on phone enrichment, you may review the wrong person.
Better design:
• treat phone as volatile
• require cross-identifier consistency
• weight by freshness
• use async lookup properly
🔥5❤1
10 Feb 2026, 11:26 UTC≈11,500 views5 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
For background check / screening SaaS builders:
Clear cases shouldn’t wait. A simple way to use enrichment without slowing conversion:
• Intake: quick triage only (don’t go heavy)
• Before the full check: choose depth (fast track vs escalate)
• Adjudication: help analysts explain why a case is unclear
Use tiers: Green / Yellow / Red instead of pass/fail — and log reasons for audit.
1. Quickstart
2. Tutorial
Question:…
❤4👍1
24 Jan 2026, 16:27 UTC≈12,300 views16 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
Most “OSINT automation” fails at the same step: turning one identifier into reliable context without flooding the report with noise.
A simple architecture that scales:
Input → Enrichment Job → Multiple lookups → Poll → Normalize → Cache → Report
Key rule: treat enrichment as signals, not truth.
Normalize outputs into a stable schema + keep an audit trail (request ids, timestamps, lookup type).
Quickstart
Tutorial…
❤12🔥4
23 Dec 2025, 17:59 UTC≈14,300 views10 reactionsread 1 September 2026 Photo
🚨 New OSINT-ish tool drop: ClearCheck Automatic Background Checks (US)
Type phone/name/email/SSN → get a PDF report in ~10 min with risk level (Low/Med/High) + recommendation.
Pricing: $17–$19/report, plus a $60 tester pack (3 reports).
Full breakdown + screenshots 👉
❤7🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @osint_anatomy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.