🐛 Bug Bounty Writeup Pondering Paths — Linux Luminarium Part 2: https://medium.com/@may.hack/pondering-paths-linux-luminarium-part-2-56236746706c How to Extract Information from Websites: Automated OSINT Techniques and Tools: https://osintteam.blog/how-to-extract-information-from-websites-automated-osint-techniques-and-tools-798b03a15247 Tata Nexarc’s OTP Leak: How an “Encrypted” API Response Handed Out Full Admin…

Channel
Daily Bounty Writeups
@dailybountywriteup
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,342subscribers
+957 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001719608948 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dailybountywriteup |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dailybountywriteup |
Topic
Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Oct 2026, 22:20 | 10,342 | +57 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 17:55 | 10,285 | +116 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 07:55 | 10,169 | +58 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 02:00 | 10,111 | +53 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 10,058 | +72 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:20 | 9,986 | +75 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 9,911 | +73 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:06 | 9,838 | +31 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 9,807 | +54 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:28 | 9,753 | +19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:42 | 9,734 | +37 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 9,697 | +74 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 03:24 | 9,623 | +43 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 9,580 | +97 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 9,483 | +53 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:11 | 9,430 | +45 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 9,385 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:22 | 9,385 | first reading |
Engagement
115 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 115 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
🐛 Bug Bounty Writeup The Bug Bounty Hunter’s Guide to Prototype Pollution: https://meetcyber.net/beginners-guide-to-understanding-client-prototype-pollution-65d9b2e7d1d8 Unauthenticated Full User Directory PII Dump — 103K+ Records Exposed: https://medium.com/@redhunter01/unauthenticated-full-user-directory-pii-dump-103k-records-exposed-def46ce4e2e5 A bug bounty is not a control you buy, it is a queue you have to s…
❤2
📝 New blog on SecurityCipher DevSecOps From Laptop to Production: A Practical Security Pipeline Guide https://securitycipher.com/2026/08/27/devsecops-laptop-to-production/ From: securitycipher.com || Piyush Kumawat
❤1
🐛 Bug Bounty Writeup — without spending a dollar.: https://medium.com/@kokyaw-gza/without-spending-a-dollar-873632f8fe21 20 Certificate Transparency Tricks for Recon: Master Advanced Asset Discovery for Ethical Hacking: https://medium.com/@verylazytech/20-certificate-transparency-tricks-for-recon-master-advanced-asset-discovery-for-ethical-hacking-0ba8bd8ecf45 Race Condition That Created an Undeletable Group Membe…
They Cut the Bounty in Half: https://osintteam.blog/they-cut-the-bounty-in-half-55f1b39eb265?source=rss------bug_bounty-5
Cloudflare WAF Bypass → DOM-Based XSS via Unsanitized iframe.src: https://medium.com/@redhunter01/cloudflare-waf-bypass-dom-based-xss-via-unsanitized-iframe-src-27a1520caac5?source=rss------bug_bounty-5
📝 New blog on SecurityCipher The CVE Flood Is a Lie: How to Hunt When AI Dumps 36% More Bugs But Exploitation Only Grows 10% https://securitycipher.com/2026/08/25/cve-flood-triage-playbook-2026/ From: securitycipher.com || Piyush Kumawat
❤1
🐛 Bug Bounty Writeup How I Manipulated One Parameter to Love Another User’s Comment -IDOR & Broken Authorization: https://medium.com/@ankitrathva/how-i-manipulated-one-parameter-to-love-another-users-comment-idor-broken-authorization-5cd5a67a13cd From: securitycipher.com || Piyush Kumawat
When a Calendar Invite Becomes Chaos: Crashing Apps Like It’s 1999: https://medium.com/@thesecguy/when-a-calendar-invite-becomes-a-weapon-crashing-apps-like-its-1999-439ca411cda3?source=rss------bug_bounty-5
When a Calendar Invite Becomes Chaos: Crashing Apps Like It’s 1999: https://medium.com/@thesecguy/when-a-calendar-invite-becomes-a-weapon-crashing-apps-like-its-1999-439ca411cda3?source=rss------bug_bounty-5
🐛 Bug Bounty Writeup When a Calendar Invite Becomes Chaos: Crashing Apps Like It’s 1999: https://medium.com/@thesecguy/when-a-calendar-invite-becomes-a-weapon-crashing-apps-like-its-1999-439ca411cda3 404 Not Found BYPASS ! Easy Bugs: https://medium.com/@swarooppatil3125/404-not-found-bypass-easy-bugs-f9a4bcb7d565 Cloudflare WAF Bypass → DOM-Based XSS via Unsanitized iframe.src: https://medium.com/@redhunter01/clou…
When a Calendar Invite Becomes Chaos: Crashing Apps Like It’s 1999: https://medium.com/@thesecguy/when-a-calendar-invite-becomes-a-weapon-crashing-apps-like-its-1999-439ca411cda3?source=rss------bug_bounty-5
Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @dailybountywriteup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thebugbountyhunter · 51,325
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
@noobtooscp · 23,119
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 September 2026
@IRCyberGuardians · 20,137
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 30 September 2026
@codelivly · 35,288
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
@udemyrip · 68,268
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 36 here — alongside 35 others — read 21 August 2026
@PentestingNews · 27,126
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 12 September 2026
@AllSecurityEngineeringCourses · 19,244
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 3 October 2026
@CyberSecurityforall24 · 34,956
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 3 September 2026
@CyberSecurityJobs · 18,792
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 5 October 2026
@Hide01 · 35,493
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 2 September 2026
@BlueTeamOps · 27,905
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 September 2026
@ctinow · 39,088
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 31 August 2026
@NewIndianERA · 50,470
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 25 August 2026
@cs_internships · 35,228
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 2 September 2026
@cibsecurity · 28,501
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@thehackernews · 163,448
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
@cybersecurityforall77 · 29,356
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 9 September 2026
@Cyber_Security_Channel · 56,790
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
@learningnets · 30,735
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Daily Bounty Writeups” (@dailybountywriteup), 10,342 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dailybountywriteup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.