File, posted without a caption

Channel
Катафалк депо
@TonDPS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
340subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002152194133 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @TonDPS |
| Description | @folqc - главный шиз @catafalque_robot - для сообщений @tonaoe - дополнения к постам @gifts_og - парсер og подарков @gifts_monochrome - читать умеешь @tonstun - переходник для IOS жанры: OSINT,TON,Telegram,quant trading, щитпост с непонятными отсылками |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/TonDPS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 340 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:00 | 340 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 26 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 32.6%
- avg views ÷ 340 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 111
- 2 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.60%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 2
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 2 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 August 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 222 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 85
- Videos
- 11
- Links
- 81
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
38 reactions across 12 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💊 | 38 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 14
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 3
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
- Most on one post
- 12
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @TonDPS. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2025 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
💊2
раздача халявы на спавне, стучите в лс @folqc с юзеркой chess.com бесплатный даймонд [5/5] всем спасибо, некст постом за щеку зашиллю вам щиткоин
💊3
Возвращаясь к теме общественного мнения о телеграмме, жидовский Time magazine высрал следующее: ✈️ «Telegram — это либо глобальный маяк свободы слова, либо пристанище для незаконной деятельности». В связи с чем захотелось снова напомнить 67iq общественности, для чего анонимность нужна на самом деле, процитирую любимку ацетона: 1️⃣ Почему анонимность? Потому что я считаю, что только анонимный человек свободен в св…
💊1
Vast minority of people знают о @tonaoe, если ваши глаza всё ещё п0лzut, то это чат-комментариев, в который я планировал постить вместо этого канала, оставляя тут лишь важное. Зная, кто на меня подписан, всё это время возможность там писать была закрыта. Несколько раз я проводил эксперименты, разрешая непродолжительное время моим мерзким крипто-подписчикам говорить. Каждый из этих экспериментов считаю неудачным и нен…
Мне похуй я заебался бесплатно постить) 1000$ в месяц стоит моё ведение канала (вся сумма будет потрачена на нар😹😻😽) У вас есть время до 1 мая, иначе гг, весь май без постов
Yesterday she sold my gifts 👌 Today I had all her shit thrown out of my rented villa 😂 Now accepting applications for a new girlfriend — but if you sell what I gift you, don’t even bother 🙅♂️ Diamond hands only, ladies 🤷
💊3
Многие спрашивают, как выложить подарки свои монохромы в @monogifts, а красивые номера в @gifts_og? Всё просто — пиши бесплатно в лс @folqc с ссылкой на свой подарок в @Tonnel_Network_bot. Так я смогу получить часть комиссии с его продажи в своих каналах, а ты гарантируешь себе несколько сотен просмотров своего объявления от заинтересованных покупателей монохромных подарков и подарков с красивыми номерами. Среди них…
💊2
многие спрашивают меня катафалк у меня кабрюраторник потек в машине что делать. ? ребят возьмите просто 3кг дегтярного мыла съешьте его и так посидите час-два
💊6
Я вышел из запоя, снова в строю😊
💊4
Да ладно, на самом деле я пошутил. Не хотел вам уебкам что-то постить🤣
💊6
одно из самых смешных явлений в тоне за последний месяц это желание солевого шизика купить рекламный слот в сетке на фоне распространения новостей о теневых педофилах в телеграмме. чтож, он знает своё место подробнее в комментариях
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @TonDPS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
forgor the number i wanted to add…
- it was like six or seven ⁶🤷⁷45%
- no we don’t need that16%
- я на бургерском не разговариваю: 67 - ог?39%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 3 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@gifts_monochrome · 8,1795 postsGifts with cool OG Numbers [Выложи подарок/Post your gift]
@gifts_og · 12,3584 postsTonnel Relayer Bot
@Tonnel_Network_bot · 150,0072 postsCryptoDays 2.0 #MTONGA
@cryptodays · 31,1711 postKito Community
@KitoCommunity · 3901 postMaryanaRo
@Maryanaro · 139,8391 postby shny
@shnydev · 2,2581 postкатафалк депо переходник
@tonstun · 101 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Катафалк депо” (@TonDPS), 340 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TonDPS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.