Channel
@crypto_unknownn
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
234subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001448954769 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_unknownn |
| Description | 💸 канал о криптовалюте • Сxeма - 150$ нoвичкy: https://telegra.ph/airdrop-04-09-4 • Статья - Как стать Трейдером: https://telegra.ph/trading-04-09-14 Ютуб: youtube.com/c/moneyunknown Админ: @moneyunknownsms Чат: @crypto_unknown |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_unknownn |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @crypto_unknownn/1194 · this entry7 Apr 2026, 20:51 UTC | @money_unknown/11147 Apr 2026, 20:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_unknownn/1195 · this entry15 Apr 2026, 13:00 UTC | @money_unknown/111515 Apr 2026, 13:01 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_unknownn/1199 · this entry6 May 2026, 20:02 UTC | @money_unknown/11196 May 2026, 20:03 UTC | 1.00 | 72 seconds |
| @crypto_unknownn/1203 · this entry26 May 2026, 21:17 UTC | @money_unknown/112326 May 2026, 21:17 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_unknownn/1204 · this entry30 May 2026, 21:06 UTC | @money_unknown/112430 May 2026, 21:07 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @crypto_unknownn/1206 · this entry2 Jun 2026, 19:37 UTC | @money_unknown/11262 Jun 2026, 19:38 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @money_unknown | 18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (18–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @crypto_unknownn — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 234 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 234 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (1 April 2026 – 30 July 2026) |
| Views total | 13 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Исторически медвежьи рынки Bitcoin длились в среднем 383 дня — (если считать нынешний цикл с обвала в октябре 2025 года), сейчас идёт уже 297-й день. Если история повторится, до возможного завершения медвежьего рынка осталось около 86 дней — это 23 октября 2026 года. Но как обычно киты будут развивать свой сценарий. Поэтому либо дно уже пройдено, либо мы его увидим чуть позже, например в декабре.
💸 Корпоративные держатели биткойнов продолжают увеличивать свои закупки третий квартал подряд. В течение последнего квартала они приобрели 110 000 BTC, что в 1,8 раза превышает объем покупок за два предыдущих квартала вместе взятые.
💲 В июне объем транзакций в стейблкоинах достиг рекордного максимума на уровне $1.79 трлн — показатель вырос на 63% относительно мая и на 125% в годовом выражении! Криптодоллар становиться частью финансового мира. @money_unknown
💸 Денежная масса США достигла рекордных $22,8 трлн! Пока биткоин на медвежьем рынке пробивает новое дно падая на 58 000$, Фондовый рынок ставит новые рекорды в капитализации. С начала 2026 года денежная масса США увеличилась на более чем $400 млрд. Часть этих средств уже направляется на фондовый рынок, однако BTC остаётся примерно на 50% ниже своего октябрьского пика. 📊 Для сравнения два графика: btc и m2$ supply.
🚪 BTC падает в зону экстремального дисконта! Последний пролив биткоина забросил цену ниже самой нижней синей полосы Rainbow Chart. По уровню страха и темпам сброса активов рынок сейчас находится в той же точке, что и на самом дне медвежки 2022 года, когда соскамилась биржа FTX и проект LUNA UST. 📉 Тем не менее это не означает, что падение закончилось. В прошлый раз BTC несколько месяцев топтался ниже этой границы, …
🗿 Биткоин обвалился до 59 100$... Новое дно медвежьего цикла, тем временем 😂 Великий крипто-президент последнюю неделю выглядит примерно так:
🆘 Биткоин рухнул на 66 000$ и упадет ещё ниже! 🆘 Недавно я предполагал, что биткоин упадет до 75 000$ (в итоге так и случилось), но после были ожидания на рост до 85 000$, ведь большинство индикаторов уже перешло в "лонг-тренд". 📉 Сейчас же мы имеем реальность в которой биткоин буквально рухнул с 83 000$ на 66 000$. Остается всего 6000$ падения до февральского дна медвежки: 59 900$. Картина складывается таким образ…
🤑 Получаем 100$ в ZEST от крипто-биржи🤑 Промка от проекта Zest Protocol. В этой раздаче новорегам дают на кошель 100$ совместно с биржей 💙 Mexc (топ 4 мира). Листинг токена ZEST провели 19 мая и на Мексе анонсировали дроп: https://www.mexc.com/ru-RU/token-airdrop/zest-protocol/3464 Актуально до 2 июня 13:00 (мск) Подтягивайте друзей и родных! Награда для новичков: 50$ + 50$ KYC. Вознаграждение в конце раздачи можно…
😂 Самый спокойный медвежий цикл на крипторынке Каждые 4 года в крипте наступает медвежий рынок и в этом цикле он стал самым милосердным. Убытки долгосрочных держателей BTC в апреле достигали лишь -15%, когда на прошлых медвежьих циклах этот показатель доходил до -75% на самом дне. • Это значит, что большинство тех, кто держит биткоин давно, всё ещё в прибыли или в небольшом минусе. • При негативном сценарии рынок м…
🐳 Долгосрочные держатели не спешат продавать на текущем ралли. Это важный сигнал: если бы киты начали массово выходить из позиций, рынок столкнулся бы с серьезным давлением. Реализация прибыли пока остается умеренной, что указывает на уверенность крупных инвесторов в дальнейшем росте. Хотя локально BTC может остыть до $75k, но глобально тренд уже сменился на бычий.
🐂 Рекордно длительный период отрицательных ставок финансирования (66 дней) указывает на медвежьи настроения. Исторически такие затяжные фазы становились фундаментом для формирования рыночного дна BTC. Но хорошая новость в том, что после разворота ставок финансирования рынок достаточно стремительно улетает вверх.
💸 (прибыль с лонга BTC +72%) фиксируем зеленый график! В недавнем посте я открывал лонг позицию по 75 000$ и по прогнозу курс биткоина пришел на сильный уровень 82 000$. Сейчас индекс страха и жадности потихоньку взлетает с 39 до 50/100. Думаю btc уже развернулся с шортов в лонг-тренд и будет тянуться к $90k. 🎹 Рекомендую учиться торговать по моей статье "как стать трейдером" http://telegra.ph/trading-04-09-14
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @crypto_unknownn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 84,058 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Unknown” (@crypto_unknownn), 234 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_unknownn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.