Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Money Unknown - крипто трейд инвестиции

Channel

Money Unknown - крипто трейд инвестиции

@money_unknown

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

952subscribers

-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001467877509
TypeChannel
Username@money_unknown
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/money_unknown

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@crypto_unknownn/11947 Apr 2026, 20:51 UTC@money_unknown/1114 · this entry7 Apr 2026, 20:52 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_unknownn/119515 Apr 2026, 13:00 UTC@money_unknown/1115 · this entry15 Apr 2026, 13:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_unknownn/11996 May 2026, 20:02 UTC@money_unknown/1119 · this entry6 May 2026, 20:03 UTC1.0072 seconds
@crypto_unknownn/120326 May 2026, 21:17 UTC@money_unknown/1123 · this entry26 May 2026, 21:17 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_unknownn/120430 May 2026, 21:06 UTC@money_unknown/1124 · this entry30 May 2026, 21:07 UTC1.00under a minute
@crypto_unknownn/12062 Jun 2026, 19:37 UTC@money_unknown/1126 · this entry2 Jun 2026, 19:38 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@crypto_unknownn18 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@crypto_unknownn (18–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 18 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 April 2026 to 30 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @crypto_unknownn. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

952983967.56 August 2026 — 983 subscribers7 August 2026 — 982 subscribers14 August 2026 — 973 subscribers21 August 2026 — 966 subscribers27 August 2026 — 961 subscribers4 September 2026 — 958 subscribers12 September 2026 — 957 subscribers26 September 2026 — 952 subscribers6 August 202626 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 50 days, net -31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 947–988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 00:59952-5
12 Sept 2026, 08:16957-1
4 Sept 2026, 08:21958-3
27 Aug 2026, 15:47961-5
21 Aug 2026, 02:23966-7
14 Aug 2026, 21:15973-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:43982-1
6 Aug 2026, 23:01983first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

85 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2529.4%
🐳2327.1%
❤1214.1%
🔥1214.1%
🤣89.41%
😭55.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 85 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC239 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🫪 Исторически медвежьи рынки Bitcoin длились в среднем 383 дня — (если считать нынешний цикл с обвала в октябре 2025 года), сейчас идёт уже 297-й день. Если история повторится, до возможного завершения медвежьего рынка осталось около 86 дней — это 23 октября 2026 года. Но как обычно киты будут развивать свой сценарий. Поэтому либо дно уже пройдено, либо мы его увидим чуть позже, например в декабре.

👍3❤1

13 Jul 2026, 19:09 UTC251 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💸 Корпоративные держатели биткойнов продолжают увеличивать свои закупки третий квартал подряд. В течение последнего квартала они приобрели 110 000 BTC, что в 1,8 раза превышает объем покупок за два предыдущих квартала вместе взятые.

🐳5👍1

6 Jul 2026, 20:43 UTC517 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💲 В июне объем транзакций в стейблкоинах достиг рекордного максимума на уровне $1.79 трлн — показатель вырос на 63% относительно мая и на 125% в годовом выражении! Криптодоллар становиться частью финансового мира. @money_unknown

👍3🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 20:02 UTC575 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💸 Денежная масса США достигла рекордных $22,8 трлн! Пока биткоин на медвежьем рынке пробивает новое дно падая на 58 000$, Фондовый рынок ставит новые рекорды в капитализации. С начала 2026 года денежная масса США увеличилась на более чем $400 млрд. Часть этих средств уже направляется на фондовый рынок, однако BTC остаётся примерно на 50% ниже своего октябрьского пика. 📊 Для сравнения два графика: btc и m2$ supply.

👍3🐳1

17 Jun 2026, 19:44 UTC539 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🚪 BTC падает в зону экстремального дисконта! Последний пролив биткоина забросил цену ниже самой нижней синей полосы Rainbow Chart. По уровню страха и темпам сброса активов рынок сейчас находится в той же точке, что и на самом дне медвежки 2022 года, когда соскамилась биржа FTX и проект LUNA UST. 📉 Тем не менее это не означает, что падение закончилось. В прошлый раз BTC несколько месяцев топтался ниже этой границы, …

❤3🐳2🤣1

5 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC386 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🗿 Биткоин обвалился до 59 100$... Новое дно медвежьего цикла, тем временем 😂 Великий крипто-президент последнюю неделю выглядит примерно так:

🤣3😭2

2 Jun 2026, 19:38 UTC400 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🆘 Биткоин рухнул на 66 000$ и упадет ещё ниже! 🆘 Недавно я предполагал, что биткоин упадет до 75 000$ (в итоге так и случилось), но после были ожидания на рост до 85 000$, ведь большинство индикаторов уже перешло в "лонг-тренд". 📉 Сейчас же мы имеем реальность в которой биткоин буквально рухнул с 83 000$ на 66 000$. Остается всего 6000$ падения до февральского дна медвежки: 59 900$. Картина складывается таким образ…

😭3🐳2

30 May 2026, 21:07 UTC396 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤑 Получаем 100$ в ZEST от крипто-биржи🤑 Промка от проекта Zest Protocol. В этой раздаче новорегам дают на кошель 100$ совместно с биржей 💙 Mexc (топ 4 мира). Листинг токена ZEST провели 19 мая и на Мексе анонсировали дроп: https://www.mexc.com/ru-RU/token-airdrop/zest-protocol/3464 Актуально до 2 июня 13:00 (мск) Подтягивайте друзей и родных! Награда для новичков: 50$ + 50$ KYC. Вознаграждение в конце раздачи можно…

👍4🔥1

26 May 2026, 21:17 UTC385 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😂 Самый спокойный медвежий цикл на крипторынке Каждые 4 года в крипте наступает медвежий рынок и в этом цикле он стал самым милосердным. Убытки долгосрочных держателей BTC в апреле достигали лишь -15%, когда на прошлых медвежьих циклах этот показатель доходил до -75% на самом дне. • Это значит, что большинство тех, кто держит биткоин давно, всё ещё в прибыли или в небольшом минусе. • При негативном сценарии рынок м…

❤3🔥1

15 May 2026, 19:01 UTC478 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐳 Долгосрочные держатели не спешат продавать на текущем ралли. Это важный сигнал: если бы киты начали массово выходить из позиций, рынок столкнулся бы с серьезным давлением. Реализация прибыли пока остается умеренной, что указывает на уверенность крупных инвесторов в дальнейшем росте. Хотя локально BTC может остыть до $75k, но глобально тренд уже сменился на бычий.

🐳3👍1

12 May 2026, 15:32 UTC403 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🐂 Рекордно длительный период отрицательных ставок финансирования (66 дней) указывает на медвежьи настроения. Исторически такие затяжные фазы становились фундаментом для формирования рыночного дна BTC. Но хорошая новость в том, что после разворота ставок финансирования рынок достаточно стремительно улетает вверх.

❤2🐳2

6 May 2026, 20:03 UTC244 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

💸 (прибыль с лонга BTC +72%) фиксируем зеленый график! В недавнем посте я открывал лонг позицию по 75 000$ и по прогнозу курс биткоина пришел на сильный уровень 82 000$. Сейчас индекс страха и жадности потихоньку взлетает с 39 до 50/100. Думаю btc уже развернулся с шортов в лонг-тренд и будет тянуться к $90k. 🎹 Рекомендую учиться торговать по моей статье "как стать трейдером" http://telegra.ph/trading-04-09-14

🔥4👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @money_unknown. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Clever Monkey [Заработок CS2; Инвестиции Steam]
@offclevermonkey · 28,576
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Money Unknown - крипто трейд инвестиции” (@money_unknown), 952 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/money_unknown.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.