CryptoRuby ✅💀 Guys im looking for channel owners which share crypto mining apps for free 💸 The reason why im looking for those is because im gonna promote CryptoRuby demo for comeback. DM me if you have one ➡️ Click to dm!
❤5👍3👏1🔥1

Channel
@crptweak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
450subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002145347782 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crptweak |
| Description | Everybody welcome to our official Telegram channel we are a community which loves earning easy money and we are making wallet miners and more follow for more! |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crptweak |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 450 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
262 reactions across 14 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 55 | 21.0% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 18.7% | |
| 🕊 | 44 | 16.8% | |
| ❤ | 22 | 8.40% | |
| 🎉 | 22 | 8.40% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 8.02% | |
| 🤬 | 14 | 5.34% | |
| 🍌 | 6 | 2.29% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 2.29% | |
| 🤣 | 6 | 2.29% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.15% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 👻 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 🗿 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.763% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.763% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 262 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2024 to 21 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
CryptoRuby ✅💀 Guys im looking for channel owners which share crypto mining apps for free 💸 The reason why im looking for those is because im gonna promote CryptoRuby demo for comeback. DM me if you have one ➡️ Click to dm!
❤5👍3👏1🔥1
CryptoRuby ✅💀 Guys get ready we are going to do a big comeback! ❤️🔥 And we are going to give the newest CryptoRuby with premium features 7 days for free! 👑 You are going to be able to access BTC, ETH, BNB plans for free for 7 days! 👑
🥰16🔥3🤩2❤1👏1
But you know what? 😁 Just watch that video...
🔥5🤣3🗿2😐2🥰1
That Crypto Ruby is not working anymore the version i published for free. 😭
😢3
Yoo... Long time no see huh? :D
❤4
Guys looks i did a big mistake by forgetting to add local server functions i will have to repost the application cause it is not gonna work right now.
👍8🤔2❤1
Don't forget to share it with friends so everyone can benefit from it 🕊️
👍3🤣3
Don't forget to share this with your friends so they can react too 😯
👍15🍌3👻2
Guys i am bored of that shit if that post reach 100 reactions gonna give CryptoRuby pc software for free! 😯🎉 Send that reaction 🕊️
🕊44🔥23🎉22👍19🍌3
We are back guys 🤙🔥 Improved everything (ui, speed, license system, responsiveness) 😁 Now CryptoRuby is fire 👨🚒 To buy,
🤬14🔥7👍4
What Do You Think About Our New Name And Logo?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
We are CryptoRuby From Now ON :O Congratz Everybody 📣
❤4👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @crptweak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What Do You Think About Our New Name And Logo?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2024 to 21 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoRuby™” (@crptweak), 450 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crptweak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.