Do I need to post fresh feedbacks now? 😁 Hit the 🔥 reaction if you want them! At least I’ll try to find the time for that…
🔥151❤21👍17❤🔥3🏆3👏3🤯1😍1

Channel
@miningwallets
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37,032subscribers
-500 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001532536975 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @cf_mining @miningwallets |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 29 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/miningwallets |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 37,032 | -13 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:38 | 37,045 | -28 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 37,073 | -17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 37,090 | -11 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:55 | 37,101 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:46 | 37,111 | -21 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:54 | 37,132 | -23 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 37,155 | -2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 37,157 | -13 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 21:27 | 37,170 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:29 | 37,174 | -48 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 37,222 | -21 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 37,243 | -8 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 13:54 | 37,251 | -26 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 37,277 | -18 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 37,295 | -42 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:03 | 37,337 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 37,337 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 37,356 | -16 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 37,372 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 29 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,303 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 389 | 29.9% | |
| ❤ | 373 | 28.6% | |
| 👍 | 321 | 24.6% | |
| 🤯 | 55 | 4.22% | |
| ❤🔥 | 52 | 3.99% | |
| 🤩 | 27 | 2.07% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 1.46% | |
| 😍 | 17 | 1.30% | |
| 🏆 | 14 | 1.07% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 0.998% | |
| 😱 | 12 | 0.921% | |
| ⚡ | 11 | 0.844% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,303reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 29 December 2024 to 3 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Do I need to post fresh feedbacks now? 😁 Hit the 🔥 reaction if you want them! At least I’ll try to find the time for that…
🔥151❤21👍17❤🔥3🏆3👏3🤯1😍1
⌛️I’ve spent 4 hours on THIS Yesterday I realized, that I was not posting feedbacks for almost a year, and decided to check what’s there, what members are sending to our clients chat and in my PM And I was shocked of that amount… 📁 Now I have a collection of ~500 hits, and I was saving only 500$+ hits 😂 AND ITS ONLY THE LAST TWO WEEKS 😅😅 Crazy guys, this shit is really crazy… We are building history togethe…
❤33👍23🔥15❤🔥4🤯3🤩2⚡1
Hello world! 🌎 Everyone who was worried that we are not working anymore, you can be calm! 🔄 We was just working with our current clients, creating new updates and new features for our community! Because we have more than 1400 active miners, and it was very hard to control everything and everyone. Was expending the team, so soon we will have a big managers group, who will help you with everything. Still teaching…
❤32👍24🔥17⚡2❤🔥2🤯2🥰2🤩1
WHY IS OUR SOFTWARE 100% LEGAL? 🤔 1️⃣ Wikipedia says: «A private key is the main item that gives you the ability to own and control your wallet and funds. Whoever owns the private key is the wallet owner.» And this is exactly what’s our software doing - combining private keys. 2️⃣ All crypto is decentralized, which means that it has no technical support, all actions made in the blockchain - not cancelable. And if …
❤🔥21❤19🥰16🔥12🤩12😍11👍8👏2
Video message, posted without a caption
🤯5❤🔥4⚡3❤3😱3👏1
🎁 Today we want to announce something special to you! ✅ MiningWallets DEMO software! 💎 Try it out: @miningwallets_bot The difference between DEMO and Full version 👇 FULL VERSION: ✔️ Up to 200,000,000 address checks per day ✔️ Full session logs and saved scan results ✔️ Unlimited withdrawal amount with 0% commission ✔️ 24/7 user support ✔️ Regular software updates ✔️ Staking detection included DEMO VERSION: ⚠️ Tr…
❤47👍19🔥18🤯3❤🔥2🤩2🏆1😍1
👀 Look at this! Asked our MiningWallets v2.0 beta-testers (it was our current clients) to share theirs test results! 🔥 And look what they got! The record was insane: 💰 0.3 BTC ≈ 31.000$ And it was only 2.0 beta with a lot of lags and bugs, the 2.1 version is even faster and stable. Think for yourself… @cm_adm
❤42👍23🔥13🤯6😍3❤🔥2👏2😱2
✨ And as you noticed, yes, we're now Mining Wallets™! 🆕 New era, new brand! @miningwallets miningwallets.com But still yours @cm_adm 😎
👍39🔥32❤22❤🔥4🏆3🤯3🤩2
🆕 FINALLY! Mining Wallets v2.1 is on public release now! Over the past month, the software has been in the closed beta test of version 2.0, fixed a bunch of bugs and added new features. We are pleased to announce the official release of the modified version of MiningWallets v2.1! ℹ️ What's new: ➡️ Now our software can be linked to the telegram bot, it is easy to control and receive notifications about found wallet…
👍41❤36🔥31❤🔥6⚡1🤩1🤯1😱1
🔈 WE ARE BACK BABY! Everyone who was worried that we are not working anymore, you can be calm! All the time we was working as usual and our clients keep finding wallets 💸 🔄 We was working for months on the biggest update of the last year! 🔥 And we are happy to introduce you a MINING WALLETS v2.0! 🔥 🔜 In a couple days I’ll drop you a list of updates we made and a special offer for the first 10 guys who will join…
🔥52👍41❤34🤯6🤩3❤🔥1🏆1
SCAM ALERT ⚠️ 🚨Last couple weeks I’m receiving much more messages from people who got scammed by fake projects! Read this article to not got scammed 👇 ➡️ Nowadays there is a lot of fake websites, such as miningcf.co (NOT .com, be careful! FAKE!), cfmine.com and others! ➡️ A lot of fake groups, admins and bots in telegram, such as @miningcf_bot (FAKE!), @cm_admm (FAKE!) also be careful! 👆This list is not full, bu…
👍26🤯13❤11🏆4😱4⚡2👏2
#feedback Some money for a New Year gifts 🎁 ✔️ Clients hits: 💰 0.01235 BTC≈ 1184$ + 🔶 0.831 BNB ≈ 537$ + 🪙 146 TON ≈ 888$ + 🔶 1.8215 BNB ≈ 1169$ + 🪙 2.6 SOL ≈ 634$ + 💰 0.004481 BTC ≈ 426$ 🔶 1.071 BNB ≈ 687$ All clients reviews you can check here: CLICK ONLY LEGIT website: miningwallets.com Buy software 👉 @cm_adm
👍39❤32🔥16🤯6👏2😱2⚡1❤🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @miningwallets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@miningwallets named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mining Wallets™” (@miningwallets), 37,032 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/miningwallets.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.