Channel
@crypto_iceENG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
35,409subscribers
-1,848 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001763929527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_iceENG |
| Description | Crypto-currency pro ⛏️ Feedback: @ice_feedback Admin: @Crypto_ICE_ADMIN |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_iceENG |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:37 | 35,409 | -48 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 35,457 | -35 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 35,492 | -23 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 23:37 | 35,515 | -21 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 35,536 | -41 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:27 | 35,577 | -25 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:36 | 35,602 | -20 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 35,622 | -34 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 35,656 | -24 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 35,680 | -40 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 35,720 | -15 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 35,735 | -25 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 10:07 | 35,760 | -29 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:59 | 35,789 | -45 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 12:46 | 35,834 | -15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 16:00 | 35,849 | -35 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 12:40 | 35,884 | -10 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 09:27 | 35,894 | +4 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 35,890 | -72 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 05:18 | 35,962 | first reading |
40 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 161 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (15 June 2026 – 31 October 2026) |
| Views total | 33,791 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Nov 2026, 17:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 31 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
A small ad. Will be removed soon Use this if you trade memecoins The best platform available right now + bonus $50 Monday I'll share some project news (what's coming, what we're improving, what we have to offer you).
🚀 Join Pump.fun and claim your $50 welcome bonus! - Download pumpfun.app - Use code: nckcall Link > pump.fun/u/nckcall #ad
Video message, posted without a caption
5 licenses LEFT Press the check▼ 🟣Software info: CLICK 🟣About scammers: CLICK 🟣Video guide: CLICK ➡️ BUY / QUESTIONS
DISCOUNT XRP/BNB/SOL ONLY 12 licenses! 🪙 = $400 = $79 🔸 = $500 = $119 🪙 = $800 = $159 We are confident and offer a guarantee: if you don’t find a single wallet within a week - refund! ➡️ BUY / QUESTIONS ❌ DISCOUNT IS OVER ❌
Posted without readable text
We see your activity and your desire to get started. We will help you. We have made important updates to certain blockchains. Be online tomorrow. 👉 read this 👈
Video message, posted without a caption
BRIEF INFORMATION ❕ We sell software for finding lost cryptocurrency wallets, the software works automatically, you just need to turn it on on your PC, Mac, Laptop, Android, Iphone Lots of new people. Check answers. Click on the question you are interested in 👇🏻 🔜 WHAT'S THE SOFT !? 🔜 ALL PRICE LIST 🔜 How much can I earn with this software? 🔜 What devices does the software work on? 🔜 IS IT LEGAL!? 🔜 Why would you …
How can you increase your chances? We have identified three main methods to speed up the search process: 1) Using a larger number of devices; 2) Installing the program on remote servers; 3) Using boosters Press the check▼ 🟣Software info: CLICK 🟣Price list: CLICK 🟣About scammers: CLICK 🟣Video guide: CLICK ➡️ BUY / QUESTIONS
WINTER ARC STARTED
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @crypto_iceENG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@crypto_iceENG edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto ICE™” (@crypto_iceENG), 35,409 subscribers as measured 1 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_iceENG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.