9 measurements spanning 10 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,734–6,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 07:54
6,737
-1
16 Aug 2026, 05:57
6,738
-4
12 Aug 2026, 23:17
6,742
no change
12 Aug 2026, 21:58
6,742
-6
10 Aug 2026, 03:31
6,748
+1
9 Aug 2026, 18:14
6,747
-6
7 Aug 2026, 02:52
6,753
-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:58
6,755
+1
6 Aug 2026, 17:47
6,754
first reading
Engagement
5 posts held, back to 30 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 41s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
90 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5280622793912767829
16
17.8%
custom 5278331991501068540
12
13.3%
custom 5280935239898648321
12
13.3%
custom 5278387688636962271
11
12.2%
custom 5280749284994603520
9
10.0%
custom 5280823673828167692
9
10.0%
custom 5280892981715424139
7
7.78%
custom 5280825138412018212
5
5.56%
custom 5280943812653371235
5
5.56%
custom 5280633758964272188
4
4.44%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2025 to 27 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ROI 150–300% без крео и кабинетов: опыт практиков
➡️ ЧИТАТЬ ПОЛНЫЙ МАТЕРИАЛ ПРО ASO ЗДЕСЬ
Код — на ИИ, дизайн и аналитика — на человека, и в результате мы имеем один из самых прибыльных каналов.
Мы собрали актуальный опыт в один материал. Сопоставили мнение ASO-юнита ZM, как компании с большими ресурсами, а также хеда отдельной ASO-команды и со-фаундера сервиса WorkApp, Лукоса.
При каких условиях ASO становится п…
Здарова, у нас короче партнерка, го затестишь?
Вот так у большинства в нашей сфере начинаются деловые переписки. Вопросов масса: Кто ты? Что за офферы? Почему именно мы?
Из-за таких менеджеров вы теряете перспективных партнеров. А это значит, нам пора продолжить обсуждать правила коммуникации.
ЧАСТЬ III. ПЕРВЫЙ КОНТАКТ
Первое сообщение в переговорах решает больше, чем кажется. И нужно уметь его составлять.
Читайт…
SiGMA Central Europe 2025: инсайды от ZM team
Общие впечатления — позитивные, очень масштабная конференция. При огромной площади организация перемещения по павильонам была достаточно удобной, но ориентироваться было гораздо сложнее, чем на Мальте и в Барселоне. Сложность перемещения и есть главный минус. Локация, к сожалению, находилась далеко от всего: и от центра, и многих гостиниц. Транспортная доступность была (…
🔥 From Creepy to Legendary: ZM Halloween Edition
Как понять, кто стоит за ZM? Кто эти люди и как они подходят к делу?
Даем демо-версию, чтобы все сразу стало ясно. Конкурс Хэллоуинских костюмов — это уже ежегодная традиция для нашей команды. То, что начиналось как фановый актив, с каждым годом все больше отражало весь дух ZM. Костюмы от криповых и мемных артов перешли в разряд реального искусства. И в этом весь ZM.…
Не получается найти нормальных партнеров?
Бывает. Никому не нужны твои услуги, офферы или трафик?
Понимаю. А ты знал, что на самом деле — ты виноват в этом сам. И это значит, нам пора продолжить обсуждать правила коммуникации.
Ну, или ПРОСТО НАЙМИ БИЗДЕВА
ЧАСТЬ II. СТИЛЬ ОБЩЕНИЯ
Первое касание, как наладить контакт с партнером, когда можно кидать мемы, а когда лучше держать официальный тон. Все это определяет, буд…
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @zmrecruiting_1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 828,695 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@zmrecruiting_1 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@anaspend named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
@zm_sales_denis named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ZM team” (@zmrecruiting_1), 6,737 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zmrecruiting_1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
