Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
6,430 average views per post against 6,949 subscribers — an engagement rate of 92.5%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
23 of 23 published in the window (4 exact, 19 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
147,795
Mature posts only
100.4% over 20 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 99 days, net -152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,884–7,261 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Nov 2026, 23:21
6,927
-15
9 Nov 2026, 02:00
6,942
-6
6 Nov 2026, 00:26
6,948
-1
3 Nov 2026, 10:41
6,949
-8
31 Oct 2026, 17:51
6,957
-14
28 Oct 2026, 10:47
6,971
-19
25 Oct 2026, 04:59
6,990
-15
22 Oct 2026, 12:18
7,005
-11
18 Oct 2026, 20:49
7,016
-10
16 Oct 2026, 03:47
7,026
-11
6 Oct 2026, 16:56
7,037
+25
29 Sept 2026, 15:38
7,012
-4
15 Sept 2026, 21:21
7,016
-16
12 Sept 2026, 04:21
7,032
+9
8 Sept 2026, 05:55
7,023
-9
3 Sept 2026, 06:48
7,032
+7
31 Aug 2026, 05:03
7,025
-58
28 Aug 2026, 15:43
7,083
+8
25 Aug 2026, 10:32
7,075
-13
22 Aug 2026, 15:13
7,088
first reading
Engagement
82 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
78.7%
avg views ÷ 6,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,450
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
41
of 82 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
82 (23 July 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
223,443
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 19:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
593
Videos
57
Links
315
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
583 reactions across 38 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
154
26.4%
custom 5274104931932971075
127
21.8%
🔥
100
17.2%
💯
69
11.8%
🌚
63
10.8%
🥰
32
5.49%
✍
29
4.97%
💔
9
1.54%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 13 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 41 posts held from the last 30 days (19.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Есть рекламные слоты на середину месяца
Две штуки таких. Пишите и присылайте ваши деньги по нашему электронному адресу @judasvanzandt. А то продадим кому-то еще! Оно вам надо?
Apple работает через офшорные структуры — просто называет это «глобальной налоговой оптимизацией»
Занятная статейка тут на VC вышла, из которой следует, что в 2026 году Apple провели через Сингапур до $50 млрд прибыли и сэкономила $2,7 млрд на налогах.
Еще $2,6 млрд. сэкономили при помощи Ирландии, какая там сумма - хз вообще, наверное, около тех же 50 млрд.
К чему лишние цифры братишка 🧐️️️️️️
Фишка собственно в…
Дженсен Хуанг покинул пост CEO NVIDIA. Все из-за того, что изменил жене с китайской шпионкой
А в арбитраже трафика ниче не случилось, но просто надо и такое запостить тоже. Ну у тебя же по любому нет похожей истории?
Там еще прикол в том, что со шпионкой он познакомился через ее же собственного мужа. А муж и не против был 👀
А я вам не порноактриса какая-нибудь! Я - между прочим амбассадор!
У BC.Game новый СЕО, некий Али Муханнед. Это молодой хасслер, который работает в конторе с 2017 года - ну, ему тогда было 19 лет.
За восемь лет молодой дослужился до любимого нами статуса С-lvl, и теперь сходу начал баловаться по делу и не по делу - читай как тратить деньги BC.Game 🫣️️️️️️
Но завидовать нечему. Никаких публично измеримых результато…
+1% к цене = +11% к прибыли, считают консультанты McKinsey Майкл Марн и Роберт Розиелло
Ну а нам то какая разница, что и как они там считали? Цена рекламного поста в SecretRoom все та же, приходи за рекламой.
В личку: @judasvanzandt
SiGMA World 2027 в Риме перенесен на май
Хотя планировалась в ноябре, как вот было щас.
Переносят конфу для того, чтобы выдержать четырехмесячные интервалы между тремя главными европейскими приколами: это Рим, Барселона и Лиссабон, соответственно ICE и SBC
Накопилась усталость или рынок охладился? Что такое?
Сами SiGMA пишут, что пора снизить усталость от событий. То есть все сводится к тому, что конференции реал…
🏀️️️️️️ Book of Dead скоро пропадет с оффшорных казиков! Впереди потеря сильного провайдера в каждом лобби
Провайдера Play’n GO щас продают, поэтому он, как водится, уходит с офшора. Наши гембловые уважаемые «аналитики» пишут в выводах, что «ситуация затронет легальные казино» и все такое - ну это ерунда и глупости, новость то ваще не об этом.
Давайте считать деньги
В 2025 году провайдер заработал невеликие €85 мл…
🦍До релиза новой ГТА осталось 10 дней — на фоне ажиотажа вокруг игры есть отличный слот
Тайтл называется Get the Bag, визуально - это прям знакомый сеттинг GTA. Если по структуре слота пройтись, то:
👩🔧 Внутри есть самая популярная щас механика - Hold & Win. Выпало шесть и более символов - запускается бонуска с тремя респинами;
🕵️♂️ Максвин х5000, игровое поле 5 на 3 с расширением до 5 на 5 на бонуске;
😁 На демк…
Голосовое сообщение
Нет, это не мама звонит, чтобы узнать, как дела. Это я предлагаю тебе купить рекламу в СикретРуме.
Пиши человеку с пистолетом @judasvanzandt
И не забудь маме тоже позвонить 📞
«В Бразилии краш-игры любят» - спасибо бро, не знал, это высший пилотаж аналитики
Аффилиатский проект SlotCatalog решил вдруг стать «полезным», «экосистемным» и так далее. По этому поводу они даже заявили о смене бизнес модели - окак 🙂
🌂 Новая бизнес-модель метит в игровых провайдеров. По неким причинам СлотКаталог решили, что теперь будут участвовать в разработке игр под разные рынки, предлагать игровые механики и…
Евгений Юрьевич дополняет:
В общем не все так плохо, как пишут, видать.
Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @secreetroommedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ЖП @cpalenta · 38,195 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026
01.tech @be01team · 19,044 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 October 2026
Owner 1win @owner1w · 24,018 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 15 September 2026
R2B @reg2bet · 26,393 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
Арбитраж. Все вакансии в одном месте. LENKEP @Arbitrazh_vakansii_rabota · 30,243 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 10 September 2026
Traffic Cardinal | Арбитраж трафика @trafficcardinal · 20,452 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 3 October 2026
Partnerkin | Арбитраж трафика @thepartnerkin · 32,038 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 6 September 2026
iGamingNews @igaming_news · 21,552 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 September 2026
Brazino777 México 🎰🍀 @brazino777mx · 22,429 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 20 September 2026
CPA HUNTER | Вакансии арбитража трафика @hr_affiliate · 35,745 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 10 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SecretRoom - бэкстейдж iGaming-рынка” (@secreetroommedia), 6,927 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secreetroommedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.