Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Corkbuzz

@corkbuzz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

450subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001360053591
TypeChannel
Username@corkbuzz
DescriptionКанал о том, как получать от вина удовольствие. От создательницы самого честного канала о ресторанах @restosnob – @juliazvereva.
Created15 September 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/corkbuzz

Growth

4506 Aug 2026, 09:47 — 450 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 450 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:476 Aug 2026, 19:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 449–451 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 19:16450no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:47450first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 29 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.1%
avg views ÷ 450 subscribers
Avg views / post
68.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held19 (29 November 20243 August 2026)
Views total68
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
181
Videos
4
Links
152

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
969.2%
🍾215.4%
👍215.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 November 2024 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 08:48 UTC68 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @foodandwineandaroundPhoto

Китайская (видимо) марка Yuhan Wang первая сообразила, как на самом деле должны выглядеть сережкив виде виноградной грозди.

7 Jul 2026, 09:02 UTC261 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если вы думаете, что нормальное шампанское начинается где-то за пределами 7000 рублей, ловите маленький лайфхак за менее чем четыре. Charles Collin Brut Classique (спасибо Насте, что открыла его для меня) – тот случай, когда бокал на вечеринке внезапно заставляет поинтересоваться у хозяина дома, что же это мы пьём. В чём секрет? База – пино нуар (и это чувствуется): больше тела, чем у типичного кисло-цитрусового ша

1

21 Feb 2026, 12:19 UTC916 viewsread 6 August 2026

Настя, чьему мнению в вине я очень доверяю, делится итогами слепой дегустации Шампани стоимостью до 5000р (кажется, это сейчас актуально как никогда). Я в новогодние праздники пробовала недорогую Шампань из Перекрёстка и это было прямо очень так себе, поэтому шпаргалка полезная.

9 Dec 2025, 14:07 UTC≈1,080 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @restosnobPhoto

Сегодня вечером в Sage ужин с винами Belmas, симпатичной семейной крымской винодельни, – в рамках серии ужинов с виноделами «Форма вина», которую шеф-сомелье ресторанов Перельмана Лена Лебедева проводит с лета. 5 вин Belmas, в том числе так покоривший меня рислинг, представят винодел Екатерина Бельмас (кстати, в её честь названа линейка Katya) и основатель хозяйства Рустам Акиниязов, вина подадут в сопровождении блю

6 Nov 2025, 16:21 UTC≈1,030 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Лучшее российское безалкогольное игристое, которое даст фору и не российским, по-прежнему ростовское Арпачино. По бокалам наливают, например, в Urban Winery.

2

30 Jul 2025, 08:31 UTC≈1,440 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

“The unspeakable in pursuit of the uneatable”, Oscar Wilde said of the English aristocracy foxhunting. Had he encountered early 21st century wine writing, he would have witnessed the unreadable in praise of the undrinkable. Люблю британский юмор, ох) Из книжки Who’s Afraid of Romanée Conti? Дэна Килинга

1

29 Jul 2025, 08:02 UTC≈1,360 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Кстати о Светлане Добрыниной – она сделала своё розе, из каберне франа, с винодельней LeGato. Надеюсь, получится попробовать.

28 Jul 2025, 13:25 UTC944 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Но настоящим тестом местных розе стало испытание французским ртом – или как правильно перевести на русский слово palate :) Оказалась недавно в Selfie на ужине со своим другом-французом, который давно не был в Москве, и он попросил принести ему то же вино, что и у меня – а я пила розе Олега Репина, которое сделала его дочь Ксения, оно в Selfie нашлось на коравине (спасибо шеф-сомелье Светлане Добрыниной). Каково же бы

28 Jul 2025, 09:15 UTC873 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

О бренде Mountain Eagle я узнала прошлым летом, когда готовила рейтинг российских розе для «Первого гида» – вино из редкого в наших широтах сорта алеатико оказалось в топе Влады Лесниченко (погружение которой в локальные вина, как говорили в моём детстве, сложно переоценить – Влада одна из главных экспертов). Это розе в топ-10 гида тогда не попало: методология нацелена на «верняк», который понравится более-менее широ

9 Jan 2025, 12:25 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как вы, друзья? Практикуете «сухой» январь?

2 Jan 2025, 11:12 UTC≈1,870 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Удивилась прекрасным бокалам для встречи Нового года у теннисистки Арины Соболенко

🍾21👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @corkbuzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Corkbuzz” (@corkbuzz), 450 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corkbuzz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.