Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Claude Code Україна

@claudecodeua

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

724subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003770099027
TypeChannel
Username@claudecodeua
Descriptionнайбільше коммюніті України по Claude Сode. батя @rozhevski: півотить numo в ai native компанію публічно і збирає людей з ші психозом разом якщо в дуркі то з гарними людьмі
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/claudecodeua

Growth

7246 Aug 2026, 09:07 — 724 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:14 — 724 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 09:076 Aug 2026, 16:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 723–725 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:14724no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:07724first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 30 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
77
Videos
6
Links
99

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

118 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3731.4%
😁3529.7%
👍1210.2%
🔥1210.2%
😱65.08%
🤣54.24%
😢32.54%
🍓21.69%
🤯21.69%
👎10.847%
😍10.847%
🤷10.847%
🥰10.847%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 April 2026 to 4 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Jun 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,090 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

зробив аб тест базового веб пошуку клоду (`webSearch`) з сервісом агентського пошуку `exa.ai`. результат (спойлер): exa значно перемагає. зрозуміло чому підняли 250 лямів недавно деталі результату під дизайном. дизайн аб тесту: - 20 запитів на 4 рівнях складності, (від «коли україна здобула незалежність» до технічних доків по API.) - потім запустив команду агентів для перевірки результатів: -- 10 агентів верифіку

7🔥5🍓2

4 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTC824 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Навіщо витрачати х10 токенів з новою фічею Ultracode (dymanic workflows) в Клод коді англ і укр ноутбуки лм 👆 Claude Code Україна

3

29 May 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,040 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

якщо вам не вистачає собачого кайфу, то увімкніть ремоут контрол в клод коді по замовчуванню x1000000 дофаміну на найближчий тиждень вам гарантую, поки не звикнете тепер усі сессії з компа (термінал чи десктоп клод) дублюється на телефон вибило вікна під час обстрілу - треба у жек - сесію продовжуєш з телефона - менше агритись на держпослуги більше кайфу тільки від героїну. вставляй в клод: додай рядок "remote

9😁2😍1

16 May 2026, 10:10 UTC≈1,190 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

дякую @zoidbergclaw що підсвітив що Гугл опублікував статтю як просуватись в AI ботах @zoidbergclaw десь на півроку від мене пішов вперед по досвіду агентському (насправді на рік мінімум). тому мені дуже цікаво читати його канал. якщо ви не підписані ще і вам цікава тема і меми - рекомендую я зробив собі ноутбуклм подкаст про цю новину і поки мив гори посуду (зламалась посудомийка) змінив кардинально свою стратегію

9

16 May 2026, 09:56 UTC801 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zoidbergclaw

Гугл опублікував статтю як просуватись в AI ботах. Зараз особливо для нових сервісів це в рази важливіше ніж SEO. Тому просто обовязково до читання Бо давайте чесно. Коли ви востаннє шукали якийсь новий сервіс через Google, а не питали ChatGPT, Claude чи Gemini: “дай 5 найкращих тулів для…”? Для нових продуктів це вже може бути важливіше за класичне SEO. Бо якщо AI тебе не знає, не розуміє, не може нормально пояс

🔥7

16 May 2026, 09:50 UTC603 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

навчив свій проект в клод коді спати і відновлюватись уві сні ⬇️︎ Claude Code Україна

😁2👍1😱1

16 May 2026, 09:50 UTC685 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🌙 Dream Mode 2026-05-16 (авто, 02:00) Самовідновлення бази знань .context/. Запуск 2026-05-09 пропущено, цей прибрав ~2 тижні дрейфу. ✅ Виправлено автоматично: • 3 нові README: design, dumps, eod • index.md: +3 домени (Design, Dumps, EOD), оновлені header і stats (60 директорій, 55 README) • 23 застарілі README освіжено (>30 днів) • 54 недокументовані файли внесено в 14 доменних README ⚠️ Потребує уваги (людина):

3

13 May 2026, 10:34 UTC710 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

додаткові матеріали: 1. його стаття From Hierarchy to Intelligence Published March 31, 2026 2. YC після цього зняли How To Build A Company With AI From The Ground Up. Той самий концепт, але не так глибоко, і ще додали той токінмаксінг, який зайшов трохи не туди 3. Jack Dorsey at Startup School 2013

1🥰1

13 May 2026, 10:29 UTC666 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

перед тим як джек дорсі звільнив 4000 людей з Блок (40% компанії) відкрив нараду питанням: "якби ми будували компанію ЗАРАЗ вона б виглядала так само?" і всі відповіли ні. місяць тому він дав інтерв'ю сіквої. розповідає про дуже абстрактні штуки дуже зрозуміло з метафорами, що навіть нетехнічній лююдині зрозуміло і хочеться поглибитись. розказує чому ієрархія застаріла, і наскільки нада перебудовуватись вже зараз.

👍42

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @claudecodeua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 272,619 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Claude Code Україна” (@claudecodeua), 724 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/claudecodeua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.